H2H data updated: 2026-07-17 14:15 UTC
Andrei Chesnokov vs Jonas Svensson H2H: 4-0
Andrei Chesnokov holds a 4–0 lead over Jonas Svensson in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Andrei Chesnokov leads 4–0 on clay. Most recently, Andrei Chesnokov won the 1989 Roland Garros second round 3-6 6-1 6-4 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 60
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
4
–
0
4 main draw meetings
SWE
Age 59
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 2, 1989* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R64 | Clay | Andrei Chesnokov | 3-6 6-1 6-4 6-0 | Jonas Svensson | Match data |
| Apr 23, 1987* | Monte Carlo | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Andrei Chesnokov | 6-2 6-0 | Jonas Svensson | Match data |
| May 28, 1986* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Andrei Chesnokov | 6-3 2-6 6-4 6-2 | Jonas Svensson | Match data |
| May 15, 1986* | Rome | Masters 1000 | R32 | Clay | Andrei Chesnokov | 7-5 6-1 | Jonas Svensson | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andrei Chesnokov | #709 | #9 | 1,399 | 1,972 | 316 | 235 | 57.4% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 7 |
| Jonas Svensson | #1,304 | #10 | 1,420 | 1,972 | 252 | 200 | 55.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Andrei Chesnokov | Jonas Svensson | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #831 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #228 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #103 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1985 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #137 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 34–19 | 64.2% | #21 | 1,843 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1986 | 13–9 | 59.1% | #36 | 1,733 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 24–18 | 57.1% | #30 | 1,835 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 1987 | 24–16 | 60.0% | #52 | 1,802 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 40–21 | 65.6% | #22 | 1,843 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 1988 | 44–16 | 73.3% | #14 | 1,884 | 0 | 2 | 1989 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #41 | 1,736 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 1989 | 30–16 | 65.2% | #22 | 1,863 | 0 | 4 | 1990 | 41–19 | 68.3% | #11 | 1,894 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | 1990 | 43–20 | 68.3% | #12 | 1,861 | 0 | 6 | 1991 | 24–21 | 53.3% | #29 | 1,787 | 0 | 5 |
| 25 | 1991 | 28–21 | 57.1% | #31 | 1,781 | 0 | 7 | 1992 | 16–23 | 41.0% | #81 | 1,718 | 0 | 5 |
| 26 | 1992 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #30 | 1,726 | 0 | 7 | 1993 | 34–28 | 54.8% | #33 | 1,767 | 0 | 5 |
| 27 | 1993 | 37–28 | 56.9% | #27 | 1,749 | 0 | 7 | 1994 | 9–17 | 34.6% | #183 | 1,635 | 0 | 5 |
| 28 | 1994 | 37–29 | 56.1% | #32 | 1,773 | 0 | 7 | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #340 | 1,620 | 0 | 5 |
| 29 | 1995 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #89 | 1,628 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1996 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #85 | 1,585 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1997 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #209 | 1,571 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1998 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #494 | 1,565 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1999 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #872 | 1,551 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |