H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Andrei Chesnokov vs Luiz Mattar H2H: 2-2

Andrei Chesnokov and Luiz Mattar are tied 2–2 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Luiz Mattar leads 2–1 on hard courts, while Andrei Chesnokov leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Luiz Mattar won the 1994 Tel Aviv round of 32 6-4 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Andrei Chesnokov
RUS Age 60 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
2 – 2
4 main draw meetings
Luiz Mattar
BRA Age 63 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Luiz Mattar #91 6-4 6-2 Andrei Chesnokov #46 Match data Oct 13, 1994* R32 Tel Aviv ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard
Luiz Mattar #47 6-4 6-4 Andrei Chesnokov #25 Match data Aug 27, 1993* R16 Long Island ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard
Andrei Chesnokov #57 6-0 6-4 Luiz Mattar #58 Match data Apr 21, 1993* R64 Monte-Carlo Masters Masters 1000 Clay
Andrei Chesnokov #44 6-4 6-3 Luiz Mattar #76 Match data Aug 28, 1992* R16 Schenectady ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Andrei Chesnokov #709 #9 1,399 1,971 317 237 57.2% 0 2 0 0 5 7
Luiz Mattar #888 #29 796 1,766 176 163 51.9% 0 0 0 0 7 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Andrei Chesnokov Luiz Mattar
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 1985 3–3 50.0% #137 1,547 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1986 13–9 59.1% #36 1,733 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 1987 24–16 60.0% #52 1,795 0 1 — — — — — — —
22 1988 44–17 72.1% #14 1,870 0 2 1986 6–7 46.2% #95 1,567 0 0
23 1989 30–16 65.2% #22 1,864 0 4 1987 24–17 58.5% #38 1,696 0 1
24 1990 43–20 68.3% #12 1,878 0 6 1988 19–17 52.8% #44 1,678 0 2
25 1991 28–21 57.1% #31 1,784 0 7 1989 23–15 60.5% #62 1,681 0 4
26 1992 29–28 50.9% #30 1,730 0 7 1990 25–18 58.1% #43 1,696 0 5
27 1993 37–28 56.9% #27 1,750 0 7 1991 17–24 41.5% #113 1,632 0 5
28 1994 37–29 56.1% #32 1,772 0 7 1992 21–17 55.3% #51 1,713 0 6
29 1995 14–22 38.9% #89 1,629 0 7 1993 19–22 46.3% #70 1,691 0 6
30 1996 11–20 35.5% #85 1,585 0 7 1994 20–18 52.6% #73 1,697 0 7
31 1997 2–4 33.3% #209 1,572 0 7 1995 2–8 20.0% #404 1,594 0 7
32 1998 2–3 40.0% #494 1,566 0 7 — — — — — — —
33 1999 0–1 0.0% #872 1,552 0 7 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Andrei Chesnokov Luiz Mattar
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
19 1985 — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1986 5 3 8 62.5% 6 2 8 75.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1987 6 5 11 54.5% 16 6 22 72.7% — — — — 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1988 24 7 31 77.4% 10 4 14 71.4% 4 2 6 66.7% 6 4 10 60.0% 1986 1 2 3 33.3% 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — — — — —
23 1989 11 9 20 55.0% 17 4 21 81.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1987 16 5 21 76.2% 8 10 18 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 1990 21 11 32 65.6% 21 6 27 77.8% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% 1988 8 8 16 50.0% 11 8 19 57.9% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
25 1991 11 7 18 61.1% 10 7 17 58.8% — — — — 7 7 14 50.0% 1989 7 5 12 58.3% 9 9 18 50.0% — — — — 7 1 8 87.5%
26 1992 17 13 30 56.7% 7 7 14 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 1990 8 5 13 61.5% 7 10 17 41.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 10 2 12 83.3%
27 1993 13 10 23 56.5% 20 10 30 66.7% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 1991 12 13 25 48.0% 3 7 10 30.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
28 1994 11 11 22 50.0% 19 13 32 59.4% — — — — 7 5 12 58.3% 1992 7 5 12 58.3% 14 11 25 56.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
29 1995 3 8 11 27.3% 7 9 16 43.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 1993 15 13 28 53.6% 4 8 12 33.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
30 1996 3 9 12 25.0% 7 7 14 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1994 9 8 17 52.9% 10 8 18 55.6% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3%
31 1997 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1995 0 5 5 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2 3 5 40.0%
32 1998 — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1999 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 127 96 223 57.0% 145 80 225 64.4% 6 14 20 30.0% 39 47 86 45.3% — 83 69 152 54.6% 71 76 147 48.3% 1 6 7 14.3% 21 12 33 63.6%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 277/316 of Andrei Chesnokov's and 143/168 of Luiz Mattar's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Andrei Chesnokov Luiz Mattar
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
25 1991 42/49 2.1 2.1 62.3% 63.5% 52.4% 45.5% 53.1% 59.0% 43.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
26 1992 50/57 3.0 3.3 54.7% 65.5% 47.0% 53.2% 42.8% 57.4% 40.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 1993 61/65 2.9 2.6 55.6% 66.2% 50.4% 49.9% 44.3% 59.1% 42.2% 1991 36/41 5.0 2.1 58.4% 66.6% 49.4% 53.2% 43.5% 59.5% 37.0%
28 1994 57/66 2.9 2.7 58.8% 66.1% 47.6% 54.0% 47.5% 58.7% 42.1% 1992 34/38 6.4 2.0 56.2% 71.6% 53.0% 64.9% 45.9% 63.5% 37.5%
29 1995 29/36 3.3 2.8 61.0% 65.8% 49.1% 53.9% 36.0% 59.1% 38.6% 1993 35/41 5.8 2.5 55.1% 69.5% 50.3% 59.1% 40.1% 60.7% 35.3%
30 1996 27/31 2.7 2.9 56.8% 62.0% 45.7% 49.9% 44.7% 54.6% 40.3% 1994 28/38 4.5 1.8 59.1% 67.2% 50.6% 55.4% 35.7% 60.5% 36.2%
31 1997 6/6 3.8 2.7 56.3% 63.0% 44.3% 62.0% 63.2% 54.8% 37.9% 1995 10/10 2.9 1.3 61.4% 61.9% 57.0% 69.4% 53.6% 60.1% 28.4%
32 1998 4/5 1.3 3.8 59.0% 59.5% 40.9% 54.3% 49.3% 52.0% 41.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 1999 1/1 2.0 3.0 57.4% 51.9% 50.0% 42.9% 0.0% 51.1% 27.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 277/554 2.8 2.7 57.9% 64.9% 48.6% 51.4% 45.5% 58.1% 41.3% — 143/339 5.3 2.1 57.4% 68.3% 51.2% 59.0% 42.4% 61.0% 36.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Andrei Chesnokov Luiz Mattar
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
19 1985 1547 121.7 — — — — — +51 — 55.0% +0.20 0–2 0–1 — +0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1986 1733 139.9 — — — — -84 +19 -231 57.1% +0.44 2–2 (50%) 4–2 (67%) — -0.26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1987 1796 145.6 — — — — -88 +23 — 57.6% +0.46 5–4 (56%) 6–3 (67%) — -0.88 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1988 1870 145.9 — — — — +7 +8 -313 64.4% +0.94 12–2 (86%) 9–8 (53%) — +0.32 1986 1567 121.0 — — — — -54 +30 — 50.0% 0.00 2–4 (33%) 4–5 (44%) — -0.15
23 1989 1864 147.5 — — — — -47 +110 — 61.3% +0.79 7–5 (58%) 6–5 (55%) — -1.29 1987 1697 124.2 — — — — -13 -71 — 52.8% -0.01 12–5 (71%) 9–8 (53%) — +3.23
24 1990 1878 150.0 — — — — -51 +149 — 63.6% +0.75 12–6 (67%) 17–7 (71%) — +2.31 1988 1679 135.5 — — — — -65 +52 — 52.9% +0.34 4–2 (67%) 4–4 (50%) — -0.58
25 1991 1785 146.6 -0.90 +3.53 1.055 51.0% -21 +168 — 54.8% +0.32 10–8 (56%) 3–5 (38%) — +0.62 1989 1682 126.0 — — — — +17 -25 — 57.4% +0.47 6–7 (46%) 6–12 (33%) — +3.17
26 1992 1731 142.0 -2.64 +1.87 0.945 49.0% +21 +122 -215 52.0% -0.08 9–13 (41%) 16–11 (59%) — -1.43 1990 1697 127.6 — — — — +63 -53 — 54.5% +0.21 10–6 (63%) 6–6 (50%) — +2.59
27 1993 1751 150.6 -1.34 +3.83 1.032 50.7% -18 +164 -256 53.5% +0.25 12–8 (60%) 14–6 (70%) — -1.46 1991 1633 123.3 -1.11 -1.85 0.913 48.4% +52 -31 -104 43.6% -0.59 3–7 (30%) 6–7 (46%) — +0.26
28 1994 1773 144.3 -2.46 +3.28 1.020 50.4% -21 +36 — 54.1% +0.22 15–11 (58%) 15–6 (71%) — -0.96 1992 1714 131.8 +1.84 -1.25 1.026 50.5% -3 -41 — 51.5% -0.02 10–6 (63%) 9–7 (56%) — -0.94
29 1995 1629 124.4 -2.64 +0.64 0.945 48.7% +12 +110 — 44.0% -0.33 4–6 (40%) 6–9 (40%) — +0.46 1993 1691 135.1 -0.37 -1.77 0.899 48.5% +48 -70 — 47.1% -0.39 7–8 (47%) 10–6 (63%) — -0.03
30 1996 1586 127.1 -5.11 +1.56 0.888 47.6% -1 +99 — 41.0% -0.58 4–7 (36%) 3–6 (33%) — -0.37 1994 1698 127.3 -0.05 -2.01 0.916 48.3% +15 -47 — 49.4% -0.17 8–1 (89%) 6–3 (67%) — -0.26
31 1997 1573 106.6 -2.39 -0.42 0.838 46.6% -10 — — 42.9% -0.57 1–1 0–1 — +0.22 1995 1594 111.7 -2.46 -4.96 0.713 45.6% +20 — — 22.7% -1.64 0–1 2–2 (50%) — +0.33
32 1998 1566 109.5 -2.05 -0.66 0.859 46.8% — +108 — 36.4% -1.45 — 1–0 — +0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1999 1553 97.0 -0.85 +0.87 0.553 38.9% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.08 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1971 149.2 -2.27 +2.59 0.984 49.7% -20 +96 -265 55.4% +0.31 93–75 (55%) 100–70 (59%) 106.2 -0.47 — 1766 133.5 -0.11 -1.94 0.921 48.7% +20 -30 -104 50.4% -0.07 62–47 (57%) 62–60 (51%) 104.7 +2.25

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.