H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Andrei Chesnokov vs Magnus Larsson H2H: 2-2
Andrei Chesnokov and Magnus Larsson are tied 2–2 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on carpet, while Andrei Chesnokov leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Magnus Larsson won the 1994 Toulouse semifinal 6-1 1-6 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 60
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
2
–
2
4 main draw meetings
SWE
Age 56
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 8, 1994* | Toulouse | ATP 250 | SF | Hard | Magnus Larsson | 6-1 1-6 6-1 | Andrei Chesnokov | Match data |
| Nov 12, 1992* | Antwerp | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Magnus Larsson | 6-3 6-4 | Andrei Chesnokov | Match data |
| Apr 18, 1991* | Nice | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Andrei Chesnokov | 6-2 6-2 | Magnus Larsson | Match data |
| Feb 21, 1991* | Stuttgart Indoor | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Andrei Chesnokov | 6-4 6-4 | Magnus Larsson | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andrei Chesnokov | #709 | #9 | 1,399 | 1,972 | 316 | 235 | 57.4% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 7 |
| Magnus Larsson | #1,422 | #10 | 2,222 | 2,040 | 293 | 217 | 57.5% | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 6 | 7 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Andrei Chesnokov | Magnus Larsson | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #381 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1985 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #137 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #145 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1986 | 13–9 | 59.1% | #36 | 1,733 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 15–9 | 62.5% | #56 | 1,680 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1987 | 24–16 | 60.0% | #52 | 1,802 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #61 | 1,718 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1988 | 44–16 | 73.3% | #14 | 1,884 | 0 | 2 | 1992 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #34 | 1,802 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 1989 | 30–16 | 65.2% | #22 | 1,863 | 0 | 4 | 1993 | 29–25 | 53.7% | #39 | 1,820 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 1990 | 43–20 | 68.3% | #12 | 1,861 | 0 | 6 | 1994 | 36–21 | 63.2% | #19 | 2,004 | 0 | 6 |
| 25 | 1991 | 28–21 | 57.1% | #31 | 1,781 | 0 | 7 | 1995 | 32–13 | 71.1% | #17 | 1,932 | 0 | 6 |
| 26 | 1992 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #30 | 1,726 | 0 | 7 | 1996 | 26–23 | 53.1% | #46 | 1,765 | 0 | 6 |
| 27 | 1993 | 37–28 | 56.9% | #27 | 1,749 | 0 | 7 | 1997 | 38–21 | 64.4% | #25 | 1,891 | 0 | 6 |
| 28 | 1994 | 37–29 | 56.1% | #32 | 1,773 | 0 | 7 | 1998 | 19–16 | 54.3% | #43 | 1,828 | 0 | 6 |
| 29 | 1995 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #89 | 1,628 | 0 | 7 | 1999 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #95 | 1,729 | 0 | 6 |
| 30 | 1996 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #85 | 1,585 | 0 | 7 | 2000 | 13–6 | 68.4% | #75 | 1,770 | 0 | 7 |
| 31 | 1997 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #209 | 1,571 | 0 | 7 | 2001 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #136 | 1,728 | 0 | 7 |
| 32 | 1998 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #494 | 1,565 | 0 | 7 | 2002 | 8–8 | 50.0% | #152 | 1,673 | 0 | 7 |
| 33 | 1999 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #872 | 1,551 | 0 | 7 | 2003 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #507 | 1,689 | 0 | 7 |