H2H data updated: 2026-07-20 02:15 UTC
Andrei Chesnokov vs Mark Philippoussis H2H: 0-1
Mark Philippoussis holds a 1–0 lead over Andrei Chesnokov in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Mark Philippoussis leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Mark Philippoussis won the 1995 Scottsdale fourth round 6-4 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 60
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 49
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 3, 1995* | Scottsdale | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Mark Philippoussis | 6-4 6-3 | Andrei Chesnokov | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andrei Chesnokov | #709 | #9 | 1,399 | 1,972 | 316 | 235 | 57.4% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 7 |
| Mark Philippoussis | #1,115 | #8 | 2,296 | 2,022 | 287 | 190 | 60.2% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 11 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Andrei Chesnokov | Mark Philippoussis | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #274 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 25–17 | 59.5% | #38 | 1,764 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1985 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #137 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 31–22 | 58.5% | #30 | 1,838 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1986 | 13–9 | 59.1% | #36 | 1,733 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 43–18 | 70.5% | #18 | 1,852 | 0 | 4 |
| 21 | 1987 | 24–16 | 60.0% | #52 | 1,802 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 31–19 | 62.0% | #15 | 1,906 | 0 | 5 |
| 22 | 1988 | 44–16 | 73.3% | #14 | 1,884 | 0 | 2 | 1999 | 30–15 | 66.7% | #19 | 1,892 | 0 | 7 |
| 23 | 1989 | 30–16 | 65.2% | #22 | 1,863 | 0 | 4 | 2000 | 40–21 | 65.6% | #11 | 1,894 | 0 | 8 |
| 24 | 1990 | 43–20 | 68.3% | #12 | 1,861 | 0 | 6 | 2001 | 10–8 | 55.6% | #104 | 1,803 | 0 | 9 |
| 25 | 1991 | 28–21 | 57.1% | #31 | 1,781 | 0 | 7 | 2002 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #80 | 1,772 | 0 | 9 |
| 26 | 1992 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #30 | 1,726 | 0 | 7 | 2003 | 34–18 | 65.4% | #9 | 1,881 | 0 | 10 |
| 27 | 1993 | 37–28 | 56.9% | #27 | 1,749 | 0 | 7 | 2004 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #109 | 1,669 | 0 | 10 |
| 28 | 1994 | 37–29 | 56.1% | #32 | 1,773 | 0 | 7 | 2005 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #171 | 1,659 | 0 | 10 |
| 29 | 1995 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #89 | 1,628 | 0 | 7 | 2006 | 11–9 | 55.0% | #114 | 1,732 | 0 | 11 |
| 30 | 1996 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #85 | 1,585 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1997 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #209 | 1,571 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1998 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #494 | 1,565 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1999 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #872 | 1,551 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |