H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Andrei Chesnokov vs Martin Jaite H2H: 1-2
Martin Jaite holds a 2–1 lead over Andrei Chesnokov in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Martin Jaite leads 2–1 on clay. Most recently, Martin Jaite won the 1988 Monte Carlo fourth round 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 60
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
ARG
Age 61
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 22, 1988* | Monte Carlo | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Martin Jaite | 6-3 6-2 | Andrei Chesnokov | Match data |
| Aug 1, 1987* | Hilversum | ATP 250 | QF | Clay | Martin Jaite | 6-2 6-4 | Andrei Chesnokov | Match data |
| Apr 18, 1987* | Nice | ATP 250 | QF | Clay | Andrei Chesnokov | 7-6 6-2 | Martin Jaite | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andrei Chesnokov | #709 | #9 | 1,399 | 1,972 | 316 | 235 | 57.4% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 7 |
| Martin Jaite | #1,214 | #10 | 1,226 | 1,965 | 272 | 157 | 63.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 12 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Andrei Chesnokov | Martin Jaite | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,504 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #285 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1985 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #137 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 11–8 | 57.9% | #56 | 1,678 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1986 | 13–9 | 59.1% | #36 | 1,733 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 37–17 | 68.5% | #20 | 1,813 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1987 | 24–16 | 60.0% | #52 | 1,802 | 0 | 1 | 1986 | 34–15 | 69.4% | #17 | 1,828 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 1988 | 44–16 | 73.3% | #14 | 1,884 | 0 | 2 | 1987 | 43–17 | 71.7% | #14 | 1,890 | 0 | 5 |
| 23 | 1989 | 30–16 | 65.2% | #22 | 1,863 | 0 | 4 | 1988 | 22–19 | 53.7% | #54 | 1,731 | 0 | 5 |
| 24 | 1990 | 43–20 | 68.3% | #12 | 1,861 | 0 | 6 | 1989 | 46–14 | 76.7% | #11 | 1,947 | 0 | 9 |
| 25 | 1991 | 28–21 | 57.1% | #31 | 1,781 | 0 | 7 | 1990 | 31–19 | 62.0% | #36 | 1,767 | 0 | 11 |
| 26 | 1992 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #30 | 1,726 | 0 | 7 | 1991 | 24–21 | 53.3% | #46 | 1,706 | 0 | 12 |
| 27 | 1993 | 37–28 | 56.9% | #27 | 1,749 | 0 | 7 | 1992 | 18–19 | 48.6% | #120 | 1,678 | 0 | 12 |
| 28 | 1994 | 37–29 | 56.1% | #32 | 1,773 | 0 | 7 | 1993 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #245 | 1,601 | 0 | 12 |
| 29 | 1995 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #89 | 1,628 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1996 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #85 | 1,585 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1997 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #209 | 1,571 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1998 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #494 | 1,565 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1999 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #872 | 1,551 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |