H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Andrei Chesnokov vs Martin Jaite H2H: 1-2

Martin Jaite holds a 2–1 lead over Andrei Chesnokov in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Martin Jaite leads 2–1 on clay. Most recently, Martin Jaite won the 1988 Monte-Carlo Masters round of 16 6-3 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Andrei Chesnokov
RUS Age 60 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1 – 2
3 main draw meetings
Martin Jaite
ARG Age 61 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Martin Jaite #15 6-3 6-2 Andrei Chesnokov #18 Match data Apr 22, 1988* R16 Monte-Carlo Masters ATP 250 Clay
Martin Jaite #15 6-2 6-4 Andrei Chesnokov #43 Match data Aug 1, 1987* QF Dutch Open ATP 250 Clay
Andrei Chesnokov #40 7-6 6-2 Martin Jaite #18 Match data Apr 18, 1987* QF Nice ATP 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Andrei Chesnokov #709 #9 1,399 1,971 317 237 57.2% 0 2 0 0 5 7
Martin Jaite #1,214 #10 1,226 1,965 275 158 63.5% 0 0 0 0 12 12

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Andrei Chesnokov Martin Jaite
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 1982 1–1 50.0% — 1,504 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1983 4–3 57.1% #285 1,546 0 0
19 1985 3–3 50.0% #137 1,547 0 0 1984 11–8 57.9% #56 1,678 0 0
20 1986 13–9 59.1% #36 1,733 0 0 1985 37–17 68.5% #20 1,814 0 1
21 1987 24–16 60.0% #52 1,795 0 1 1986 34–15 69.4% #17 1,828 0 3
22 1988 44–17 72.1% #14 1,870 0 2 1987 43–17 71.7% #14 1,890 0 5
23 1989 30–16 65.2% #22 1,864 0 4 1988 25–20 55.6% #54 1,741 0 5
24 1990 43–20 68.3% #12 1,878 0 6 1989 46–14 76.7% #11 1,948 0 9
25 1991 28–21 57.1% #31 1,784 0 7 1990 31–19 62.0% #36 1,768 0 11
26 1992 29–28 50.9% #30 1,730 0 7 1991 24–21 53.3% #46 1,706 0 12
27 1993 37–28 56.9% #27 1,750 0 7 1992 18–19 48.6% #120 1,681 0 12
28 1994 37–29 56.1% #32 1,772 0 7 1993 1–4 20.0% #245 1,603 0 12
29 1995 14–22 38.9% #89 1,629 0 7 — — — — — — —
30 1996 11–20 35.5% #85 1,585 0 7 — — — — — — —
31 1997 2–4 33.3% #209 1,572 0 7 — — — — — — —
32 1998 2–3 40.0% #494 1,566 0 7 — — — — — — —
33 1999 0–1 0.0% #872 1,552 0 7 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Andrei Chesnokov Martin Jaite
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — —
19 1985 — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1984 — — — — 11 8 19 57.9% — — — — — — — —
20 1986 5 3 8 62.5% 6 2 8 75.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 1985 5 4 9 55.6% 32 12 44 72.7% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1987 6 5 11 54.5% 16 6 22 72.7% — — — — 2 5 7 28.6% 1986 0 2 2 0.0% 33 12 45 73.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
22 1988 24 7 31 77.4% 10 4 14 71.4% 4 2 6 66.7% 6 4 10 60.0% 1987 3 4 7 42.9% 40 12 52 76.9% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
23 1989 11 9 20 55.0% 17 4 21 81.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1988 11 6 17 64.7% 14 12 26 53.8% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0%
24 1990 21 11 32 65.6% 21 6 27 77.8% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% 1989 7 3 10 70.0% 29 9 38 76.3% — — — — 10 2 12 83.3%
25 1991 11 7 18 61.1% 10 7 17 58.8% — — — — 7 7 14 50.0% 1990 11 6 17 64.7% 17 10 27 63.0% — — — — 3 3 6 50.0%
26 1992 17 13 30 56.7% 7 7 14 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 1991 5 7 12 41.7% 17 11 28 60.7% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0%
27 1993 13 10 23 56.5% 20 10 30 66.7% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 1992 9 7 16 56.3% 9 12 21 42.9% — — — — — — — —
28 1994 11 11 22 50.0% 19 13 32 59.4% — — — — 7 5 12 58.3% 1993 — — — — 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — —
29 1995 3 8 11 27.3% 7 9 16 43.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1996 3 9 12 25.0% 7 7 14 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1997 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1998 — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1999 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 127 96 223 57.0% 145 80 225 64.4% 6 14 20 30.0% 39 47 86 45.3% — 51 39 90 56.7% 208 106 314 66.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 15 12 27 55.6%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 277/316 of Andrei Chesnokov's and 78/87 of Martin Jaite's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Andrei Chesnokov Martin Jaite
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
25 1991 42/49 2.1 2.1 62.3% 63.5% 52.4% 45.5% 53.1% 59.0% 43.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
26 1992 50/57 3.0 3.3 54.7% 65.5% 47.0% 53.2% 42.8% 57.4% 40.2% 1991 40/45 4.4 2.3 52.5% 70.7% 49.7% 53.9% 43.5% 61.0% 38.5%
27 1993 61/65 2.9 2.6 55.6% 66.2% 50.4% 49.9% 44.3% 59.1% 42.2% 1992 33/37 4.8 2.4 51.4% 68.9% 50.8% 51.3% 42.2% 59.8% 40.4%
28 1994 57/66 2.9 2.7 58.8% 66.1% 47.6% 54.0% 47.5% 58.7% 42.1% 1993 5/5 3.0 2.6 48.1% 65.3% 43.6% 36.3% 41.5% 54.3% 35.8%
29 1995 29/36 3.3 2.8 61.0% 65.8% 49.1% 53.9% 36.0% 59.1% 38.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 1996 27/31 2.7 2.9 56.8% 62.0% 45.7% 49.9% 44.7% 54.6% 40.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 1997 6/6 3.8 2.7 56.3% 63.0% 44.3% 62.0% 63.2% 54.8% 37.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 1998 4/5 1.3 3.8 59.0% 59.5% 40.9% 54.3% 49.3% 52.0% 41.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 1999 1/1 2.0 3.0 57.4% 51.9% 50.0% 42.9% 0.0% 51.1% 27.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 277/554 2.8 2.7 57.9% 64.9% 48.6% 51.4% 45.5% 58.1% 41.3% — 78/433 4.5 2.4 51.8% 69.6% 49.8% 51.7% 42.8% 60.1% 39.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Andrei Chesnokov Martin Jaite
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 1505 102.7 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.34 1–1 — — +0.34
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 1546 116.6 — — — — — +29 — 58.8% +0.18 1–2 (33%) 1–0 — +0.69
19 1985 1547 121.7 — — — — — +51 — 55.0% +0.20 0–2 0–1 — +0.06 1984 1679 138.0 — — — — — +39 — 54.3% +0.20 2–2 (50%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.05
20 1986 1733 139.9 — — — — -84 +19 -231 57.1% +0.44 2–2 (50%) 4–2 (67%) — -0.26 1985 1814 148.5 — — — — -225 +124 — 65.7% +0.94 8–7 (53%) 10–1 (91%) — +1.02
21 1987 1796 145.6 — — — — -88 +23 — 57.6% +0.46 5–4 (56%) 6–3 (67%) — -0.88 1986 1829 149.1 — — — — — +104 — 62.5% +0.94 9–2 (82%) 5–3 (63%) — -1.18
22 1988 1870 145.9 — — — — +7 +8 -313 64.4% +0.94 12–2 (86%) 9–8 (53%) — +0.32 1987 1891 153.1 — — — — -345 +124 — 66.7% +1.10 9–8 (53%) 12–8 (60%) — -0.79
23 1989 1864 147.5 — — — — -47 +110 — 61.3% +0.79 7–5 (58%) 6–5 (55%) — -1.29 1988 1741 143.8 — — — — -84 +115 — 56.7% +0.57 6–6 (50%) 4–6 (40%) — +0.19
24 1990 1878 150.0 — — — — -51 +149 — 63.6% +0.75 12–6 (67%) 17–7 (71%) — +2.31 1989 1948 147.5 — — — — -114 -9 — 69.3% +1.12 14–6 (70%) 11–7 (61%) — +0.50
25 1991 1785 146.6 -0.90 +3.53 1.055 51.0% -21 +168 — 54.8% +0.32 10–8 (56%) 3–5 (38%) — +0.62 1990 1768 136.5 — — — — -21 +142 — 58.3% +0.39 11–7 (61%) 11–6 (65%) — +1.68
26 1992 1731 142.0 -2.64 +1.87 0.945 49.0% +21 +122 -215 52.0% -0.08 9–13 (41%) 16–11 (59%) — -1.43 1991 1707 146.0 +0.84 -0.20 0.987 49.8% -22 +147 — 47.7% 0.00 11–3 (79%) 6–11 (35%) — -3.34
27 1993 1751 150.6 -1.34 +3.83 1.032 50.7% -18 +164 -256 53.5% +0.25 12–8 (60%) 14–6 (70%) — -1.46 1992 1682 122.5 -0.08 +0.48 1.004 50.2% -2 +24 — 46.1% -0.28 7–6 (54%) 7–5 (58%) — 0.00
28 1994 1773 144.3 -2.46 +3.28 1.020 50.4% -21 +36 — 54.1% +0.22 15–11 (58%) 15–6 (71%) — -0.96 1993 1604 96.1 -2.34 -3.48 0.784 45.7% — +20 — 18.2% -1.73 1–0 1–2 (33%) — +0.57
29 1995 1629 124.4 -2.64 +0.64 0.945 48.7% +12 +110 — 44.0% -0.33 4–6 (40%) 6–9 (40%) — +0.46 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1996 1586 127.1 -5.11 +1.56 0.888 47.6% -1 +99 — 41.0% -0.58 4–7 (36%) 3–6 (33%) — -0.37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1997 1573 106.6 -2.39 -0.42 0.838 46.6% -10 — — 42.9% -0.57 1–1 0–1 — +0.22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1998 1566 109.5 -2.05 -0.66 0.859 46.8% — +108 — 36.4% -1.45 — 1–0 — +0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1999 1553 97.0 -0.85 +0.87 0.553 38.9% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.08 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1971 149.2 -2.27 +2.59 0.984 49.7% -20 +96 -265 55.4% +0.31 93–75 (55%) 100–70 (59%) 106.2 -0.47 — 1966 149.4 +0.25 -0.12 0.979 49.7% -87 +92 — 59.5% +0.61 80–50 (62%) 69–51 (58%) 107.8 -0.09

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.