H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Andrei Chesnokov vs Mats Wilander H2H: 3-3

Andrei Chesnokov and Mats Wilander are tied 3–3 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, they are tied 3–3 on clay. Most recently, Andrei Chesnokov won the 1991 Monte Carlo Masters third round 7-6(3) 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Andrei Chesnokov
RUS Age 60 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
3 – 3
6 main draw meetings
Mats Wilander
SWE Age 61 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Apr 25, 1991* Monte Carlo Masters Masters 1000 R32 Clay Andrei Chesnokov #12 7-6(3) 6-2 Mats Wilander #64 Match data
Jun 9, 1989* Roland Garros Grand Slam QF Clay Andrei Chesnokov #27 6-4 6-0 7-5 Mats Wilander #4 Match data
May 13, 1987* Rome Masters 1000 R64 Clay Mats Wilander #4 6-2 6-3 Andrei Chesnokov #32 Match data
Apr 25, 1987* Monte Carlo ATP 250 QF Clay Mats Wilander #5 6-1 6-3 Andrei Chesnokov #33 Match data
Jun 1, 1986* Roland Garros Grand Slam R32 Clay Andrei Chesnokov #81 6-2 6-3 6-2 Mats Wilander #2 Match data
May 17, 1986* Rome Masters 1000 R16 Clay Mats Wilander #2 6-4 6-3 Andrei Chesnokov #119 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Andrei Chesnokov #709 #9 1,399 1,972 316 235 57.4% 0 2 0 0 5 7
Mats Wilander #1,354 #1 1,075 2,262 526 203 72.2% 7 6 0 0 20 33

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Andrei Chesnokov Mats Wilander
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1980 1–4 20.0% #283 1,496 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1981 13–10 56.5% #73 1,662 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1982 56–16 77.8% #8 2,020 1 4
18 — — — — — — — 1983 71–11 86.6% #4 2,246 2 13
19 1985 3–3 50.0% #137 1,546 0 0 1984 49–12 80.3% #4 2,177 3 16
20 1986 13–9 59.1% #36 1,733 0 0 1985 65–17 79.3% #3 2,108 4 19
21 1987 24–16 60.0% #52 1,802 0 1 1986 46–13 78.0% #3 2,056 4 21
22 1988 44–16 73.3% #14 1,884 0 2 1987 65–17 79.3% #3 2,082 4 26
23 1989 30–16 65.2% #22 1,863 0 4 1988 51–9 85.0% #1 2,152 7 32
24 1990 43–20 68.3% #12 1,861 0 6 1989 31–15 67.4% #12 1,922 7 32
25 1991 28–21 57.1% #31 1,781 0 7 1990 21–13 61.8% #41 1,894 7 33
26 1992 28–27 50.9% #30 1,726 0 7 1991 9–10 47.4% #159 1,767 7 33
27 1993 37–28 56.9% #27 1,749 0 7 — — — — — — —
28 1994 37–29 56.1% #32 1,773 0 7 1993 3–7 30.0% #330 1,695 7 33
29 1995 14–22 38.9% #89 1,628 0 7 1994 17–20 45.9% #129 1,652 7 33
30 1996 11–20 35.5% #85 1,585 0 7 1995 21–18 53.8% #46 1,766 7 33
31 1997 2–4 33.3% #209 1,571 0 7 1996 7–11 38.9% #196 1,679 7 33
32 1998 2–3 40.0% #494 1,565 0 7 — — — — — — —
33 1999 0–1 0.0% #872 1,551 0 7 — — — — — — —