H2H data updated: 2026-09-06 00:00 UTC

Andrei Chesnokov vs Mauricio Hadad H2H: 0-1

Mauricio Hadad holds a 1–0 lead over Andrei Chesnokov in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Mauricio Hadad leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Mauricio Hadad won the 1996 Australian Open round of 128 4-6 6-4 6-2 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Andrei Chesnokov
RUS Age 60 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Mauricio Hadad
COL Age 54 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Mauricio Hadad #97 4-6 6-4 6-2 6-2 Andrei Chesnokov #86 Match data Jan 17, 1996* R128 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Andrei Chesnokov #709 #9 1,399 1,971 317 237 57.2% 0 2 0 0 5 7
Mauricio Hadad #1,378 #78 565 1,734 43 49 46.7% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Andrei Chesnokov Mauricio Hadad
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 1985 3–3 50.0% #137 1,547 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1986 13–9 59.1% #36 1,733 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 1987 24–16 60.0% #52 1,795 0 1 1993 3–6 33.3% #108 1,505 0 0
22 1988 44–17 72.1% #14 1,870 0 2 1994 8–14 36.4% #126 1,519 0 0
23 1989 30–16 65.2% #22 1,864 0 4 1995 17–11 60.7% #103 1,694 0 1
24 1990 43–20 68.3% #12 1,878 0 6 1996 11–14 44.0% #124 1,637 0 1
25 1991 28–21 57.1% #31 1,784 0 7 — — — — — — —
26 1992 29–28 50.9% #30 1,730 0 7 1998 2–2 50.0% #272 1,632 0 1
27 1993 37–28 56.9% #27 1,750 0 7 — — — — — — —
28 1994 37–29 56.1% #32 1,772 0 7 2000 0–1 0.0% #288 1,611 0 1
29 1995 14–22 38.9% #89 1,629 0 7 2001 2–1 66.7% #500 1,617 0 1
30 1996 11–20 35.5% #85 1,585 0 7 — — — — — — —
31 1997 2–4 33.3% #209 1,572 0 7 — — — — — — —
32 1998 2–3 40.0% #494 1,566 0 7 — — — — — — —
33 1999 0–1 0.0% #872 1,552 0 7 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Andrei Chesnokov Mauricio Hadad
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
19 1985 — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1986 5 3 8 62.5% 6 2 8 75.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1987 6 5 11 54.5% 16 6 22 72.7% — — — — 2 5 7 28.6% 1993 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
22 1988 24 7 31 77.4% 10 4 14 71.4% 4 2 6 66.7% 6 4 10 60.0% 1994 2 7 9 22.2% 6 5 11 54.5% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
23 1989 11 9 20 55.0% 17 4 21 81.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1995 7 6 13 53.8% 10 5 15 66.7% — — — — — — — —
24 1990 21 11 32 65.6% 21 6 27 77.8% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% 1996 6 8 14 42.9% 5 6 11 45.5% — — — — — — — —
25 1991 11 7 18 61.1% 10 7 17 58.8% — — — — 7 7 14 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1992 17 13 30 56.7% 7 7 14 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 1998 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — —
27 1993 13 10 23 56.5% 20 10 30 66.7% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1994 11 11 22 50.0% 19 13 32 59.4% — — — — 7 5 12 58.3% 2000 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
29 1995 3 8 11 27.3% 7 9 16 43.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 2001 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — —
30 1996 3 9 12 25.0% 7 7 14 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1997 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1998 — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1999 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 127 96 223 57.0% 145 80 225 64.4% 6 14 20 30.0% 39 47 86 45.3% — 18 25 43 41.9% 25 20 45 55.6% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — —

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 277/316 of Andrei Chesnokov's and 79/92 of Mauricio Hadad's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Andrei Chesnokov Mauricio Hadad
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
21 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1993 7/9 1.3 4.7 58.7% 58.2% 40.9% 46.8% 35.9% 51.5% 35.1%
22 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1994 20/22 1.1 2.3 61.4% 60.3% 48.9% 50.8% 29.5% 55.6% 37.6%
23 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1995 25/28 1.8 1.7 64.6% 62.4% 50.3% 44.6% 46.9% 58.2% 38.8%
24 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1996 21/25 1.4 2.5 63.5% 63.6% 45.1% 49.2% 51.8% 57.6% 38.6%
25 1991 42/49 2.1 2.1 62.3% 63.5% 52.4% 45.5% 53.1% 59.0% 43.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
26 1992 50/57 3.0 3.3 54.7% 65.5% 47.0% 53.2% 42.8% 57.4% 40.2% 1998 3/4 1.7 2.3 55.6% 69.6% 55.1% 67.1% 69.8% 63.1% 53.8%
27 1993 61/65 2.9 2.6 55.6% 66.2% 50.4% 49.9% 44.3% 59.1% 42.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
28 1994 57/66 2.9 2.7 58.8% 66.1% 47.6% 54.0% 47.5% 58.7% 42.1% 2000 1/1 2.0 1.0 52.6% 42.5% 50.0% 50.0% 66.7% 46.1% 45.6%
29 1995 29/36 3.3 2.8 61.0% 65.8% 49.1% 53.9% 36.0% 59.1% 38.6% 2001 2/3 1.5 4.0 59.9% 72.4% 53.5% 70.0% 50.5% 64.2% 50.2%
30 1996 27/31 2.7 2.9 56.8% 62.0% 45.7% 49.9% 44.7% 54.6% 40.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 1997 6/6 3.8 2.7 56.3% 63.0% 44.3% 62.0% 63.2% 54.8% 37.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 1998 4/5 1.3 3.8 59.0% 59.5% 40.9% 54.3% 49.3% 52.0% 41.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 1999 1/1 2.0 3.0 57.4% 51.9% 50.0% 42.9% 0.0% 51.1% 27.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 277/554 2.8 2.7 57.9% 64.9% 48.6% 51.4% 45.5% 58.1% 41.3% — 79/92 1.5 2.4 62.4% 62.1% 48.0% 49.2% 44.0% 57.0% 39.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Andrei Chesnokov Mauricio Hadad
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
19 1985 1547 121.7 — — — — — +51 — 55.0% +0.20 0–2 0–1 — +0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1986 1733 139.9 — — — — -84 +19 -231 57.1% +0.44 2–2 (50%) 4–2 (67%) 103.6 -0.26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1987 1796 145.6 — — — — -88 +23 — 57.6% +0.46 5–4 (56%) 6–3 (67%) 102.4 -0.88 1993 1505 114.0 -4.24 -1.10 0.724 43.7% +67 — — 33.3% -1.00 2–1 (67%) — — +0.36
22 1988 1870 145.9 — — — — +7 +8 -313 64.4% +0.94 12–2 (86%) 9–8 (53%) 108.9 +0.32 1994 1519 114.5 -3.25 -1.43 0.847 46.6% -5 +58 — 41.1% -0.64 3–5 (38%) 6–6 (50%) 98.6 +1.37
23 1989 1864 147.5 — — — — -47 +110 — 61.3% +0.79 7–5 (58%) 6–5 (55%) 99.6 -1.29 1995 1694 136.5 -1.90 +0.58 0.928 48.4% -58 +5 — 55.1% -0.22 7–2 (78%) 9–1 (90%) 113.5 -0.31
24 1990 1878 150.0 — — — — -51 +149 — 63.6% +0.75 12–6 (67%) 17–7 (71%) 106.7 +2.31 1996 1637 124.3 -2.67 -0.32 0.910 48.5% +17 0 — 41.9% -0.61 4–4 (50%) 4–5 (44%) 99.3 +0.39
25 1991 1785 146.6 -0.90 +3.53 1.055 51.0% -21 +168 — 54.8% +0.32 10–8 (56%) 3–5 (38%) 97.6 +0.62 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1992 1731 142.0 -2.64 +1.87 0.945 49.0% +21 +122 -215 52.0% -0.08 9–13 (41%) 16–11 (59%) 95.7 -1.43 1998 1633 106.6 +0.89 +2.65 1.458 58.4% — +29 — 42.9% +0.43 0–1 1–1 — +0.20
27 1993 1751 150.6 -1.34 +3.83 1.032 50.7% -18 +164 -256 53.5% +0.25 12–8 (60%) 14–6 (70%) 110.2 -1.46 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1994 1773 144.3 -2.46 +3.28 1.020 50.4% -21 +36 — 54.1% +0.22 15–11 (58%) 15–6 (71%) 108.6 -0.96 2000 1612 98.1 -2.27 -0.58 0.845 45.8% — — — 33.3% -2.00 0–1 — — +0.12
29 1995 1629 124.4 -2.64 +0.64 0.945 48.7% +12 +110 — 44.0% -0.33 4–6 (40%) 6–9 (40%) 93.7 +0.46 2001 1617 105.8 -0.89 -0.36 1.400 57.1% — +24 — 62.5% +1.00 1–1 — — +0.44
30 1996 1586 127.1 -5.11 +1.56 0.888 47.6% -1 +99 — 41.0% -0.58 4–7 (36%) 3–6 (33%) 94.7 -0.37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1997 1573 106.6 -2.39 -0.42 0.838 46.6% -10 — — 42.9% -0.57 1–1 0–1 — +0.22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1998 1566 109.5 -2.05 -0.66 0.859 46.8% — +108 — 36.4% -1.45 — 1–0 — +0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1999 1553 97.0 -0.85 +0.87 0.553 38.9% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.08 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1971 149.2 -2.27 +2.59 0.984 49.7% -20 +96 -265 55.4% +0.31 93–75 (55%) 100–70 (59%) 106.2 -0.47 — 1734 128.1 -2.53 -0.28 0.908 48.1% -4 +20 — 45.6% -0.46 17–15 (53%) 20–13 (61%) 107.6 +2.79

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.