Andrei Chesnokov
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jim Courier | 5 | 4 | 9 | Oct 22, 1994 | H2H |
| Michael Stich | 3 | 6 | 9 | May 7, 1994 | H2H |
| Henri Leconte | 0 | 8 | 8 | Apr 19, 1991 | H2H |
| Karel Novacek | 4 | 3 | 7 | Apr 13, 1995 | H2H |
| Jaime Yzaga | 5 | 2 | 7 | Apr 14, 1994 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-03 00:00 UTC
Michael Stich holds a 6–3 lead over Andrei Chesnokov in their ATP head-to-head. Across 9 main-draw meetings, Michael Stich leads 4–0 on clay, while Andrei Chesnokov leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Michael Stich won the 1994 Hamburg Open round of 16 6-0 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Michael Stich | 6-0 6-4 | Andrei Chesnokov | Match data | May 7, 1994* | R16 | Hamburg Open | Masters 1000 | Clay |
| Michael Stich | 6-1 2-6 6-0 | Andrei Chesnokov | Match data | Apr 30, 1994* | SF | Munich Open | ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 | Clay |
| Michael Stich | 6-2 7-5 | Andrei Chesnokov | Match data | Jul 24, 1993* | QF | Stuttgart Open | ATP Championship Series → modern equivalent ATP 500 | Clay |
| Michael Stich | 6-3 6-7(1) 7-6(7) 6-4 | Andrei Chesnokov | Match data | May 10, 1993* | F | Hamburg Open | Masters 1000 | Clay |
| Andrei Chesnokov | 1-6 7-6(4) 6-3 | Michael Stich | Match data | Mar 8, 1992* | SF | Indian Wells Open | Masters 1000 | Hard |
| Michael Stich | 7-6 6-4 | Andrei Chesnokov | Match data | Nov 1, 1990* | R32 | Paris Masters | Masters 1000 | Carpet |
| Andrei Chesnokov | 2-6 7-6 6-4 | Michael Stich | Match data | Oct 4, 1990* | R32 | Toulouse | ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 | Hard |
| Michael Stich | 6-3 6-1 | Andrei Chesnokov | Match data | Mar 2, 1990* | R16 | Memphis | ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 | Hard |
| Andrei Chesnokov | 7-5 6-2 | Michael Stich | Match data | Nov 11, 1989* | R16 | Wembley | ATP 250 | Carpet |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andrei Chesnokov | #709 | #9 | 1,399 | 1,971 | 317 | 237 | 57.2% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 7 |
| Michael Stich | #116 | #2 | 3,445 | 2,120 | 351 | 163 | 68.3% | 1 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 10 | 18 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Andrei Chesnokov | Michael Stich | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 1985 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #137 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1986 | 13–9 | 59.1% | #36 | 1,733 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #100 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1987 | 24–16 | 60.0% | #52 | 1,795 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #42 | 1,784 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1988 | 44–17 | 72.1% | #14 | 1,870 | 0 | 2 | 1991 | 68–23 | 74.7% | #4 | 1,991 | 1 | 5 |
| 23 | 1989 | 30–16 | 65.2% | #22 | 1,864 | 0 | 4 | 1992 | 43–20 | 68.3% | #15 | 2,005 | 1 | 7 |
| 24 | 1990 | 43–20 | 68.3% | #12 | 1,878 | 0 | 6 | 1993 | 67–19 | 77.9% | #2 | 2,083 | 1 | 13 |
| 25 | 1991 | 28–21 | 57.1% | #31 | 1,784 | 0 | 7 | 1994 | 54–21 | 72.0% | #9 | 1,932 | 1 | 16 |
| 26 | 1992 | 29–28 | 50.9% | #30 | 1,730 | 0 | 7 | 1995 | 39–18 | 68.4% | #12 | 1,896 | 1 | 17 |
| 27 | 1993 | 37–28 | 56.9% | #27 | 1,750 | 0 | 7 | 1996 | 25–15 | 62.5% | #16 | 1,833 | 1 | 18 |
| 28 | 1994 | 37–29 | 56.1% | #32 | 1,772 | 0 | 7 | 1997 | 15–12 | 55.6% | #64 | 1,844 | 1 | 18 |
| 29 | 1995 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #89 | 1,629 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1996 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #85 | 1,585 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1997 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #209 | 1,572 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1998 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #494 | 1,566 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1999 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #872 | 1,552 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Andrei Chesnokov | Michael Stich | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 19 | 1985 | — | — | — | — | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1986 | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | 6 | 2 | 8 | 75.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 1989 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% |
| 21 | 1987 | 6 | 5 | 11 | 54.5% | 16 | 6 | 22 | 72.7% | — | — | — | — | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 1990 | 20 | 10 | 30 | 66.7% | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% |
| 22 | 1988 | 24 | 7 | 31 | 77.4% | 10 | 4 | 14 | 71.4% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | 6 | 4 | 10 | 60.0% | 1991 | 31 | 10 | 41 | 75.6% | 16 | 5 | 21 | 76.2% | 10 | 1 | 11 | 90.9% | 11 | 7 | 18 | 61.1% |
| 23 | 1989 | 11 | 9 | 20 | 55.0% | 17 | 4 | 21 | 81.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 1992 | 13 | 8 | 21 | 61.9% | 12 | 7 | 19 | 63.2% | 9 | 1 | 10 | 90.0% | 9 | 4 | 13 | 69.2% |
| 24 | 1990 | 21 | 11 | 32 | 65.6% | 21 | 6 | 27 | 77.8% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 1993 | 17 | 7 | 24 | 70.8% | 17 | 5 | 22 | 77.3% | 9 | 1 | 10 | 90.0% | 24 | 6 | 30 | 80.0% |
| 25 | 1991 | 11 | 7 | 18 | 61.1% | 10 | 7 | 17 | 58.8% | — | — | — | — | 7 | 7 | 14 | 50.0% | 1994 | 15 | 7 | 22 | 68.2% | 16 | 5 | 21 | 76.2% | 6 | 2 | 8 | 75.0% | 17 | 7 | 24 | 70.8% |
| 26 | 1992 | 17 | 13 | 30 | 56.7% | 7 | 7 | 14 | 50.0% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 1995 | 19 | 8 | 27 | 70.4% | 8 | 5 | 13 | 61.5% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | 8 | 3 | 11 | 72.7% |
| 27 | 1993 | 13 | 10 | 23 | 56.5% | 20 | 10 | 30 | 66.7% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | 1996 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 7 | 2 | 9 | 77.8% | 5 | 2 | 7 | 71.4% | 11 | 7 | 18 | 61.1% |
| 28 | 1994 | 11 | 11 | 22 | 50.0% | 19 | 13 | 32 | 59.4% | — | — | — | — | 7 | 5 | 12 | 58.3% | 1997 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 7 | 2 | 9 | 77.8% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% |
| 29 | 1995 | 3 | 8 | 11 | 27.3% | 7 | 9 | 16 | 43.8% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1996 | 3 | 9 | 12 | 25.0% | 7 | 7 | 14 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1997 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1998 | — | — | — | — | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1999 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 127 | 96 | 223 | 57.0% | 145 | 80 | 225 | 64.4% | 6 | 14 | 20 | 30.0% | 39 | 47 | 86 | 45.3% | — | 118 | 60 | 178 | 66.3% | 84 | 42 | 126 | 66.7% | 58 | 16 | 74 | 78.4% | 91 | 45 | 136 | 66.9% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 277/316 of Andrei Chesnokov's and 365/439 of Michael Stich's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Andrei Chesnokov | Michael Stich | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 22 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 78/91 | 6.5 | 3.2 | 57.9% | 76.6% | 57.1% | 66.4% | 46.1% | 68.2% | 39.0% |
| 23 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 52/63 | 7.3 | 3.4 | 58.9% | 76.8% | 57.1% | 64.9% | 46.6% | 68.3% | 37.6% |
| 24 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 63/86 | 9.0 | 5.1 | 54.1% | 79.2% | 52.8% | 63.0% | 46.0% | 67.1% | 38.4% |
| 25 | 1991 | 42/49 | 2.1 | 2.1 | 62.3% | 63.5% | 52.4% | 45.5% | 53.1% | 59.0% | 43.2% | 1994 | 67/75 | 8.3 | 3.8 | 56.5% | 80.3% | 52.6% | 64.5% | 43.9% | 68.1% | 39.1% |
| 26 | 1992 | 50/57 | 3.0 | 3.3 | 54.7% | 65.5% | 47.0% | 53.2% | 42.8% | 57.4% | 40.2% | 1995 | 48/57 | 8.1 | 3.4 | 56.3% | 78.2% | 52.5% | 68.3% | 43.8% | 67.1% | 39.8% |
| 27 | 1993 | 61/65 | 2.9 | 2.6 | 55.6% | 66.2% | 50.4% | 49.9% | 44.3% | 59.1% | 42.2% | 1996 | 31/40 | 11.6 | 5.1 | 54.9% | 80.1% | 49.7% | 65.1% | 42.5% | 66.2% | 39.0% |
| 28 | 1994 | 57/66 | 2.9 | 2.7 | 58.8% | 66.1% | 47.6% | 54.0% | 47.5% | 58.7% | 42.1% | 1997 | 26/27 | 9.0 | 5.9 | 53.5% | 75.8% | 50.4% | 65.7% | 40.1% | 64.0% | 37.3% |
| 29 | 1995 | 29/36 | 3.3 | 2.8 | 61.0% | 65.8% | 49.1% | 53.9% | 36.0% | 59.1% | 38.6% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1996 | 27/31 | 2.7 | 2.9 | 56.8% | 62.0% | 45.7% | 49.9% | 44.7% | 54.6% | 40.3% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1997 | 6/6 | 3.8 | 2.7 | 56.3% | 63.0% | 44.3% | 62.0% | 63.2% | 54.8% | 37.9% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1998 | 4/5 | 1.3 | 3.8 | 59.0% | 59.5% | 40.9% | 54.3% | 49.3% | 52.0% | 41.3% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1999 | 1/1 | 2.0 | 3.0 | 57.4% | 51.9% | 50.0% | 42.9% | 0.0% | 51.1% | 27.1% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 277/554 | 2.8 | 2.7 | 57.9% | 64.9% | 48.6% | 51.4% | 45.5% | 58.1% | 41.3% | — | 365/514 | 8.2 | 4.1 | 56.3% | 78.2% | 53.8% | 65.3% | 44.7% | 67.4% | 38.7% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Andrei Chesnokov | Michael Stich | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 19 | 1985 | 1547 | 121.7 | — | — | — | — | — | +51 | — | 55.0% | +0.20 | 0–2 | 0–1 | — | +0.06 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1986 | 1733 | 139.9 | — | — | — | — | -84 | +19 | -231 | 57.1% | +0.44 | 2–2 (50%) | 4–2 (67%) | — | -0.26 | 1989 | 1586 | 127.2 | — | — | — | — | -41 | -34 | +24 | 51.7% | +0.15 | 3–5 (38%) | 2–2 (50%) | — | +0.27 |
| 21 | 1987 | 1796 | 145.6 | — | — | — | — | -88 | +23 | — | 57.6% | +0.46 | 5–4 (56%) | 6–3 (67%) | — | -0.88 | 1990 | 1785 | 147.1 | — | — | — | — | -4 | -221 | -110 | 57.4% | +0.43 | 5–11 (31%) | 17–10 (63%) | — | -2.47 |
| 22 | 1988 | 1870 | 145.9 | — | — | — | — | +7 | +8 | -313 | 64.4% | +0.94 | 12–2 (86%) | 9–8 (53%) | — | +0.32 | 1991 | 1991 | 162.6 | +7.11 | +1.14 | 1.226 | 53.3% | -46 | -130 | -46 | 69.4% | +1.15 | 12–7 (63%) | 28–17 (62%) | — | -3.59 |
| 23 | 1989 | 1864 | 147.5 | — | — | — | — | -47 | +110 | — | 61.3% | +0.79 | 7–5 (58%) | 6–5 (55%) | — | -1.29 | 1992 | 2006 | 155.8 | +6.32 | +0.24 | 1.184 | 52.7% | -29 | -142 | +14 | 65.1% | +0.82 | 6–7 (46%) | 19–13 (59%) | — | -1.90 |
| 24 | 1990 | 1878 | 150.0 | — | — | — | — | -51 | +149 | — | 63.6% | +0.75 | 12–6 (67%) | 17–7 (71%) | — | +2.31 | 1993 | 2084 | 165.9 | +5.83 | +1.02 | 1.168 | 52.6% | +6 | -105 | +36 | 68.4% | +0.97 | 23–10 (70%) | 37–17 (69%) | — | -2.80 |
| 25 | 1991 | 1785 | 146.6 | -0.90 | +3.53 | 1.055 | 51.0% | -21 | +168 | — | 54.8% | +0.32 | 10–8 (56%) | 3–5 (38%) | — | +0.62 | 1994 | 1933 | 155.0 | +5.80 | +0.79 | 1.225 | 53.3% | +27 | +70 | +175 | 66.5% | +1.00 | 16–6 (73%) | 18–18 (50%) | — | +0.70 |
| 26 | 1992 | 1731 | 142.0 | -2.64 | +1.87 | 0.945 | 49.0% | +21 | +122 | -215 | 52.0% | -0.08 | 9–13 (41%) | 16–11 (59%) | — | -1.43 | 1995 | 1897 | 154.8 | +4.74 | +2.25 | 1.210 | 53.3% | +35 | +61 | +83 | 65.5% | +0.98 | 10–6 (63%) | 13–14 (48%) | — | -0.41 |
| 27 | 1993 | 1751 | 150.6 | -1.34 | +3.83 | 1.032 | 50.7% | -18 | +164 | -256 | 53.5% | +0.25 | 12–8 (60%) | 14–6 (70%) | — | -1.46 | 1996 | 1834 | 149.9 | +3.10 | +2.21 | 1.154 | 52.8% | +5 | +182 | +187 | 62.6% | +0.77 | 2–6 (25%) | 15–7 (68%) | — | -1.26 |
| 28 | 1994 | 1773 | 144.3 | -2.46 | +3.28 | 1.020 | 50.4% | -21 | +36 | — | 54.1% | +0.22 | 15–11 (58%) | 15–6 (71%) | — | -0.96 | 1997 | 1844 | 128.8 | +1.60 | +0.14 | 1.038 | 50.8% | -74 | +115 | +189 | 56.0% | +0.08 | 5–4 (56%) | 8–7 (53%) | — | -0.51 |
| 29 | 1995 | 1629 | 124.4 | -2.64 | +0.64 | 0.945 | 48.7% | +12 | +110 | — | 44.0% | -0.33 | 4–6 (40%) | 6–9 (40%) | — | +0.46 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1996 | 1586 | 127.1 | -5.11 | +1.56 | 0.888 | 47.6% | -1 | +99 | — | 41.0% | -0.58 | 4–7 (36%) | 3–6 (33%) | — | -0.37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1997 | 1573 | 106.6 | -2.39 | -0.42 | 0.838 | 46.6% | -10 | — | — | 42.9% | -0.57 | 1–1 | 0–1 | — | +0.22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1998 | 1566 | 109.5 | -2.05 | -0.66 | 0.859 | 46.8% | — | +108 | — | 36.4% | -1.45 | — | 1–0 | — | +0.01 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1999 | 1553 | 97.0 | -0.85 | +0.87 | 0.553 | 38.9% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -4.00 | — | — | — | +0.08 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 1971 | 149.2 | -2.27 | +2.59 | 0.984 | 49.7% | -20 | +96 | -265 | 55.4% | +0.31 | 93–75 (55%) | 100–70 (59%) | 106.2 | -0.47 | — | 2120 | 160.0 | +5.49 | +1.09 | 1.187 | 52.9% | -7 | -44 | +61 | 64.7% | +0.84 | 82–62 (57%) | 157–105 (60%) | 105.6 | -2.34 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jim Courier | 5 | 4 | 9 | Oct 22, 1994 | H2H |
| Michael Stich | 3 | 6 | 9 | May 7, 1994 | H2H |
| Henri Leconte | 0 | 8 | 8 | Apr 19, 1991 | H2H |
| Karel Novacek | 4 | 3 | 7 | Apr 13, 1995 | H2H |
| Jaime Yzaga | 5 | 2 | 7 | Apr 14, 1994 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stefan Edberg | 8 | 6 | 14 | Oct 30, 1996 | H2H |
| Richard Krajicek | 7 | 6 | 13 | Apr 24, 1997 | H2H |
| Boris Becker | 4 | 9 | 13 | Oct 11, 1996 | H2H |
| Jim Courier | 6 | 5 | 11 | Jun 25, 1997 | H2H |
| Alexander Volkov | 8 | 1 | 9 | Feb 29, 1996 | H2H |