H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Andrei Chesnokov vs Michiel Schapers H2H: 1-0
Andrei Chesnokov holds a 1–0 lead over Michiel Schapers in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Andrei Chesnokov leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Andrei Chesnokov won the 1992 Schenectady third round 6-4 7-6(5).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 60
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
NED
Age 66
Right-Handed
201 cm / 6'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 27, 1992* | Schenectady | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Andrei Chesnokov | 6-4 7-6(5) | Michiel Schapers | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andrei Chesnokov | #709 | #9 | 1,399 | 1,972 | 316 | 235 | 57.4% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 7 |
| Michiel Schapers | #1,230 | #25 | 606 | 1,841 | 151 | 176 | 46.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Andrei Chesnokov | Michiel Schapers | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 1985 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #137 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1986 | 13–9 | 59.1% | #36 | 1,733 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1987 | 24–16 | 60.0% | #52 | 1,802 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1988 | 44–16 | 73.3% | #14 | 1,884 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1989 | 30–16 | 65.2% | #22 | 1,863 | 0 | 4 | 1983 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #95 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1990 | 43–20 | 68.3% | #12 | 1,861 | 0 | 6 | 1984 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #78 | 1,651 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1991 | 28–21 | 57.1% | #31 | 1,781 | 0 | 7 | 1985 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #105 | 1,646 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1992 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #30 | 1,726 | 0 | 7 | 1986 | 20–23 | 46.5% | #84 | 1,632 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1993 | 37–28 | 56.9% | #27 | 1,749 | 0 | 7 | 1987 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #49 | 1,718 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1994 | 37–29 | 56.1% | #32 | 1,773 | 0 | 7 | 1988 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #50 | 1,720 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1995 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #89 | 1,628 | 0 | 7 | 1989 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #79 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 1996 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #85 | 1,585 | 0 | 7 | 1990 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #169 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 1997 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #209 | 1,571 | 0 | 7 | 1991 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #85 | 1,611 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 1998 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #494 | 1,565 | 0 | 7 | 1992 | 17–26 | 39.5% | #103 | 1,590 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | 1999 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #872 | 1,551 | 0 | 7 | 1993 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #270 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 |