Andrei Chesnokov
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jim Courier | 5 | 4 | 9 | Oct 22, 1994 | H2H |
| Michael Stich | 3 | 6 | 9 | May 7, 1994 | H2H |
| Henri Leconte | 0 | 8 | 8 | Apr 19, 1991 | H2H |
| Karel Novacek | 4 | 3 | 7 | Apr 13, 1995 | H2H |
| Jaime Yzaga | 5 | 2 | 7 | Apr 14, 1994 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-07 00:00 UTC
Mikael Tillstrom holds a 2–0 lead over Andrei Chesnokov in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Mikael Tillstrom leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Mikael Tillstrom won the 1996 Stuttgart Open round of 32 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mikael Tillstrom | 6-3 6-3 | Andrei Chesnokov | Match data | Jul 18, 1996* | R32 | Stuttgart Open | Championship Series → modern equivalent ATP 500 | Clay |
| Mikael Tillstrom | 6-0 6-2 | Andrei Chesnokov | Match data | Jul 24, 1992* | R16 | Dutch Open | ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 | Clay |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andrei Chesnokov | #709 | #9 | 1,399 | 1,971 | 317 | 237 | 57.2% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 7 |
| Mikael Tillstrom | #506 | #39 | 966 | 1,833 | 109 | 109 | 50.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Andrei Chesnokov | Mikael Tillstrom | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 1985 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #137 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1986 | 13–9 | 59.1% | #36 | 1,733 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 7–4 | 63.6% | #141 | 1,610 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1987 | 24–16 | 60.0% | #52 | 1,795 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #438 | 1,564 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1988 | 44–17 | 72.1% | #14 | 1,870 | 0 | 2 | 1994 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #149 | 1,659 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1989 | 30–16 | 65.2% | #22 | 1,864 | 0 | 4 | 1995 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #116 | 1,700 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1990 | 43–20 | 68.3% | #12 | 1,878 | 0 | 6 | 1996 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #47 | 1,757 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1991 | 28–21 | 57.1% | #31 | 1,784 | 0 | 7 | 1997 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #68 | 1,644 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1992 | 29–28 | 50.9% | #30 | 1,730 | 0 | 7 | 1998 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #85 | 1,644 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1993 | 37–28 | 56.9% | #27 | 1,750 | 0 | 7 | 1999 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #79 | 1,685 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1994 | 37–29 | 56.1% | #32 | 1,772 | 0 | 7 | 2000 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #80 | 1,669 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 1995 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #89 | 1,629 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1996 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #85 | 1,585 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1997 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #209 | 1,572 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1998 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #494 | 1,566 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1999 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #872 | 1,552 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Andrei Chesnokov | Mikael Tillstrom | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 19 | 1985 | — | — | — | — | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1986 | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | 6 | 2 | 8 | 75.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 1992 | — | — | — | — | 7 | 4 | 11 | 63.6% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1987 | 6 | 5 | 11 | 54.5% | 16 | 6 | 22 | 72.7% | — | — | — | — | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 1993 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1988 | 24 | 7 | 31 | 77.4% | 10 | 4 | 14 | 71.4% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | 6 | 4 | 10 | 60.0% | 1994 | — | — | — | — | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1989 | 11 | 9 | 20 | 55.0% | 17 | 4 | 21 | 81.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 1995 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1990 | 21 | 11 | 32 | 65.6% | 21 | 6 | 27 | 77.8% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 1996 | 13 | 9 | 22 | 59.1% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% |
| 25 | 1991 | 11 | 7 | 18 | 61.1% | 10 | 7 | 17 | 58.8% | — | — | — | — | 7 | 7 | 14 | 50.0% | 1997 | 15 | 15 | 30 | 50.0% | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% |
| 26 | 1992 | 17 | 13 | 30 | 56.7% | 7 | 7 | 14 | 50.0% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 1998 | 12 | 8 | 20 | 60.0% | 5 | 6 | 11 | 45.5% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 2 | 6 | 8 | 25.0% |
| 27 | 1993 | 13 | 10 | 23 | 56.5% | 20 | 10 | 30 | 66.7% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | 1999 | 10 | 9 | 19 | 52.6% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% |
| 28 | 1994 | 11 | 11 | 22 | 50.0% | 19 | 13 | 32 | 59.4% | — | — | — | — | 7 | 5 | 12 | 58.3% | 2000 | 13 | 11 | 24 | 54.2% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1995 | 3 | 8 | 11 | 27.3% | 7 | 9 | 16 | 43.8% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1996 | 3 | 9 | 12 | 25.0% | 7 | 7 | 14 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1997 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1998 | — | — | — | — | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1999 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 127 | 96 | 223 | 57.0% | 145 | 80 | 225 | 64.4% | 6 | 14 | 20 | 30.0% | 39 | 47 | 86 | 45.3% | — | 65 | 53 | 118 | 55.1% | 27 | 33 | 60 | 45.0% | 3 | 8 | 11 | 27.3% | 14 | 15 | 29 | 48.3% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 277/316 of Andrei Chesnokov's and 191/218 of Mikael Tillstrom's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Andrei Chesnokov | Mikael Tillstrom | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 20 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 11/11 | 3.5 | 2.1 | 53.7% | 68.0% | 49.2% | 45.2% | 53.6% | 59.3% | 42.5% |
| 21 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 3/3 | 1.3 | 1.3 | 57.3% | 53.6% | 37.5% | 49.4% | 42.8% | 47.1% | 33.3% |
| 22 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 6/6 | 4.8 | 3.3 | 59.9% | 71.9% | 49.8% | 52.2% | 35.7% | 63.3% | 42.7% |
| 23 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 6/7 | 3.3 | 2.7 | 55.5% | 72.0% | 50.2% | 62.8% | 36.6% | 62.2% | 38.5% |
| 24 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 35/43 | 4.3 | 2.6 | 61.4% | 68.6% | 50.5% | 58.3% | 43.0% | 61.7% | 37.2% |
| 25 | 1991 | 42/49 | 2.1 | 2.1 | 62.3% | 63.5% | 52.4% | 45.5% | 53.1% | 59.0% | 43.2% | 1997 | 36/40 | 4.2 | 4.0 | 56.3% | 67.8% | 48.1% | 57.3% | 43.5% | 59.0% | 37.0% |
| 26 | 1992 | 50/57 | 3.0 | 3.3 | 54.7% | 65.5% | 47.0% | 53.2% | 42.8% | 57.4% | 40.2% | 1998 | 36/41 | 4.0 | 4.1 | 56.1% | 70.5% | 49.8% | 55.9% | 45.3% | 61.4% | 39.8% |
| 27 | 1993 | 61/65 | 2.9 | 2.6 | 55.6% | 66.2% | 50.4% | 49.9% | 44.3% | 59.1% | 42.2% | 1999 | 29/33 | 3.2 | 3.4 | 60.4% | 64.3% | 47.6% | 54.4% | 38.7% | 57.1% | 37.2% |
| 28 | 1994 | 57/66 | 2.9 | 2.7 | 58.8% | 66.1% | 47.6% | 54.0% | 47.5% | 58.7% | 42.1% | 2000 | 29/34 | 5.4 | 3.1 | 61.8% | 71.0% | 50.7% | 54.3% | 43.1% | 63.3% | 37.8% |
| 29 | 1995 | 29/36 | 3.3 | 2.8 | 61.0% | 65.8% | 49.1% | 53.9% | 36.0% | 59.1% | 38.6% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1996 | 27/31 | 2.7 | 2.9 | 56.8% | 62.0% | 45.7% | 49.9% | 44.7% | 54.6% | 40.3% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1997 | 6/6 | 3.8 | 2.7 | 56.3% | 63.0% | 44.3% | 62.0% | 63.2% | 54.8% | 37.9% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1998 | 4/5 | 1.3 | 3.8 | 59.0% | 59.5% | 40.9% | 54.3% | 49.3% | 52.0% | 41.3% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1999 | 1/1 | 2.0 | 3.0 | 57.4% | 51.9% | 50.0% | 42.9% | 0.0% | 51.1% | 27.1% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 277/554 | 2.8 | 2.7 | 57.9% | 64.9% | 48.6% | 51.4% | 45.5% | 58.1% | 41.3% | — | 191/218 | 4.1 | 3.3 | 58.6% | 68.4% | 49.2% | 55.5% | 43.1% | 60.4% | 38.2% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Andrei Chesnokov | Mikael Tillstrom | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 19 | 1985 | 1547 | 121.7 | — | — | — | — | — | +51 | — | 55.0% | +0.20 | 0–2 | 0–1 | — | +0.06 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1986 | 1733 | 139.9 | — | — | — | — | -84 | +19 | -231 | 57.1% | +0.44 | 2–2 (50%) | 4–2 (67%) | 103.6 | -0.26 | 1992 | 1610 | 130.5 | -0.02 | +0.86 | 1.043 | 51.1% | — | +50 | — | 60.0% | +0.60 | 2–1 (67%) | 1–1 | — | +0.32 |
| 21 | 1987 | 1796 | 145.6 | — | — | — | — | -88 | +23 | — | 57.6% | +0.46 | 5–4 (56%) | 6–3 (67%) | 102.4 | -0.88 | 1993 | 1565 | 98.7 | -2.61 | -4.01 | 0.629 | 40.6% | — | +48 | — | 14.3% | -3.43 | 0–1 | 1–0 | — | +0.08 |
| 22 | 1988 | 1870 | 145.9 | — | — | — | — | +7 | +8 | -313 | 64.4% | +0.94 | 12–2 (86%) | 9–8 (53%) | 108.9 | +0.32 | 1994 | 1659 | 123.3 | +0.12 | +3.90 | 1.163 | 52.0% | — | +33 | — | 65.0% | +0.95 | 1–1 | 2–0 | — | -0.08 |
| 23 | 1989 | 1864 | 147.5 | — | — | — | — | -47 | +110 | — | 61.3% | +0.79 | 7–5 (58%) | 6–5 (55%) | 99.6 | -1.29 | 1995 | 1700 | 128.4 | +0.34 | +0.88 | 1.020 | 50.0% | -116 | +8 | — | 57.9% | +0.10 | 1–1 | 4–1 (80%) | — | -0.51 |
| 24 | 1990 | 1878 | 150.0 | — | — | — | — | -51 | +149 | — | 63.6% | +0.75 | 12–6 (67%) | 17–7 (71%) | 106.7 | +2.31 | 1996 | 1758 | 143.5 | +0.31 | -0.34 | 0.972 | 49.6% | -20 | -38 | -90 | 50.4% | -0.11 | 14–6 (70%) | 13–10 (57%) | 110.0 | -1.65 |
| 25 | 1991 | 1785 | 146.6 | -0.90 | +3.53 | 1.055 | 51.0% | -21 | +168 | — | 54.8% | +0.32 | 10–8 (56%) | 3–5 (38%) | 97.6 | +0.62 | 1997 | 1645 | 136.5 | -2.09 | -0.47 | 0.901 | 48.2% | +49 | +14 | — | 46.1% | -0.39 | 7–10 (41%) | 12–6 (67%) | 101.9 | -0.19 |
| 26 | 1992 | 1731 | 142.0 | -2.64 | +1.87 | 0.945 | 49.0% | +21 | +122 | -215 | 52.0% | -0.08 | 9–13 (41%) | 16–11 (59%) | 95.7 | -1.43 | 1998 | 1645 | 134.6 | -0.69 | +1.32 | 1.030 | 50.7% | +38 | -20 | — | 49.5% | +0.18 | 7–7 (50%) | 6–6 (50%) | 99.3 | +1.60 |
| 27 | 1993 | 1751 | 150.6 | -1.34 | +3.83 | 1.032 | 50.7% | -18 | +164 | -256 | 53.5% | +0.25 | 12–8 (60%) | 14–6 (70%) | 110.2 | -1.46 | 1999 | 1686 | 128.2 | -2.99 | +0.64 | 0.869 | 47.5% | +38 | -88 | — | 44.3% | -0.57 | 9–5 (64%) | 6–4 (60%) | 105.4 | -0.10 |
| 28 | 1994 | 1773 | 144.3 | -2.46 | +3.28 | 1.020 | 50.4% | -21 | +36 | — | 54.1% | +0.22 | 15–11 (58%) | 15–6 (71%) | 108.6 | -0.96 | 2000 | 1669 | 136.1 | +0.93 | +0.39 | 1.030 | 50.2% | +50 | -32 | — | 49.4% | -0.07 | 7–6 (54%) | 5–6 (45%) | 99.9 | -0.68 |
| 29 | 1995 | 1629 | 124.4 | -2.64 | +0.64 | 0.945 | 48.7% | +12 | +110 | — | 44.0% | -0.33 | 4–6 (40%) | 6–9 (40%) | 93.7 | +0.46 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1996 | 1586 | 127.1 | -5.11 | +1.56 | 0.888 | 47.6% | -1 | +99 | — | 41.0% | -0.58 | 4–7 (36%) | 3–6 (33%) | 94.7 | -0.37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1997 | 1573 | 106.6 | -2.39 | -0.42 | 0.838 | 46.6% | -10 | — | — | 42.9% | -0.57 | 1–1 | 0–1 | — | +0.22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1998 | 1566 | 109.5 | -2.05 | -0.66 | 0.859 | 46.8% | — | +108 | — | 36.4% | -1.45 | — | 1–0 | — | +0.01 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1999 | 1553 | 97.0 | -0.85 | +0.87 | 0.553 | 38.9% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -4.00 | — | — | — | +0.08 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 1971 | 149.2 | -2.27 | +2.59 | 0.984 | 49.7% | -20 | +96 | -265 | 55.4% | +0.31 | 93–75 (55%) | 100–70 (59%) | 106.2 | -0.47 | — | 1833 | 142.0 | -0.81 | +0.39 | 0.964 | 49.3% | +27 | -4 | -90 | 49.1% | -0.13 | 48–38 (56%) | 50–34 (60%) | 111.2 | -0.56 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jim Courier | 5 | 4 | 9 | Oct 22, 1994 | H2H |
| Michael Stich | 3 | 6 | 9 | May 7, 1994 | H2H |
| Henri Leconte | 0 | 8 | 8 | Apr 19, 1991 | H2H |
| Karel Novacek | 4 | 3 | 7 | Apr 13, 1995 | H2H |
| Jaime Yzaga | 5 | 2 | 7 | Apr 14, 1994 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pete Sampras | 0 | 6 | 6 | Jan 21, 2000 | H2H |
| Yevgeny Kafelnikov | 1 | 4 | 5 | Aug 17, 2000 | H2H |
| Goran Ivanisevic | 3 | 2 | 5 | Jan 6, 2000 | H2H |
| Michael Chang | 1 | 3 | 4 | Jun 15, 2000 | H2H |
| Andrei Cherkasov | 3 | 1 | 4 | Jan 7, 2000 | H2H |