H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Andrei Chesnokov vs Nicolas Kiefer H2H: 1-1
Andrei Chesnokov and Nicolas Kiefer are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on carpet. Most recently, Nicolas Kiefer won the 1995 Ostrava third round 6-3 3-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 60
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
GER
Age 49
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 12, 1995* | Ostrava | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Nicolas Kiefer | 6-3 3-6 6-3 | Andrei Chesnokov | Match data |
| Mar 18, 1995* | St. Petersburg | ATP 250 | QF | Carpet | Andrei Chesnokov | 6-4 6-2 | Nicolas Kiefer | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andrei Chesnokov | #709 | #9 | 1,399 | 1,972 | 316 | 235 | 57.4% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 7 |
| Nicolas Kiefer | #720 | #4 | 2,447 | 1,984 | 343 | 252 | 57.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Andrei Chesnokov | Nicolas Kiefer | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1198 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #206 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #128 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1985 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #137 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 26–16 | 61.9% | #32 | 1,798 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1986 | 13–9 | 59.1% | #36 | 1,733 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 31–25 | 55.4% | #35 | 1,790 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1987 | 24–16 | 60.0% | #52 | 1,802 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 53–21 | 71.6% | #6 | 1,921 | 0 | 4 |
| 22 | 1988 | 44–16 | 73.3% | #14 | 1,884 | 0 | 2 | 2000 | 30–15 | 66.7% | #20 | 1,921 | 0 | 6 |
| 23 | 1989 | 30–16 | 65.2% | #22 | 1,863 | 0 | 4 | 2001 | 26–25 | 51.0% | #42 | 1,766 | 0 | 6 |
| 24 | 1990 | 43–20 | 68.3% | #12 | 1,861 | 0 | 6 | 2002 | 19–24 | 44.2% | #72 | 1,718 | 0 | 6 |
| 25 | 1991 | 28–21 | 57.1% | #31 | 1,781 | 0 | 7 | 2003 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #58 | 1,727 | 0 | 6 |
| 26 | 1992 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #30 | 1,726 | 0 | 7 | 2004 | 32–19 | 62.7% | #21 | 1,897 | 0 | 6 |
| 27 | 1993 | 37–28 | 56.9% | #27 | 1,749 | 0 | 7 | 2005 | 31–22 | 58.5% | #22 | 1,854 | 0 | 6 |
| 28 | 1994 | 37–29 | 56.1% | #32 | 1,773 | 0 | 7 | 2006 | 14–8 | 63.6% | #48 | 1,843 | 0 | 6 |
| 29 | 1995 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #89 | 1,628 | 0 | 7 | 2007 | 19–12 | 61.3% | #49 | 1,893 | 0 | 6 |
| 30 | 1996 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #85 | 1,585 | 0 | 7 | 2008 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #38 | 1,876 | 0 | 6 |
| 31 | 1997 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #209 | 1,571 | 0 | 7 | 2009 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #116 | 1,757 | 0 | 6 |
| 32 | 1998 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #494 | 1,565 | 0 | 7 | 2010 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #722 | 1,717 | 0 | 6 |
| 33 | 1999 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #872 | 1,551 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |