H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Andrei Chesnokov vs Paul Haarhuis H2H: 2-3

Paul Haarhuis holds a 3–2 lead over Andrei Chesnokov in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Paul Haarhuis leads 3–0 on hard courts, while Andrei Chesnokov leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Andrei Chesnokov won the 1994 Rome Masters second round 7-5 6-0.

RUS Age 60 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
2 3
5 main draw meetings
NED Age 60 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 11, 1994* Rome Masters Masters 1000 R64 Clay Andrei Chesnokov #33 7-5 6-0 Paul Haarhuis #23 Match data
Aug 7, 1993* Prague ATP 250 QF Clay Andrei Chesnokov #31 6-2 6-2 Paul Haarhuis #52 Match data
Aug 19, 1992* New Haven ATP 250 R64 Hard Paul Haarhuis #32 6-2 6-3 Andrei Chesnokov #43 Match data
Aug 30, 1991* US Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Paul Haarhuis #45 6-1 4-6 6-2 7-6(2) Andrei Chesnokov #27 Match data
Aug 15, 1991* New Haven ATP 250 R32 Hard Paul Haarhuis #54 7-6(5) 3-6 7-5 Andrei Chesnokov #23 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Andrei Chesnokov #709 #9 1,399 1,972 316 235 57.4% 0 2 0 0 5 7
Paul Haarhuis #623 #18 1,341 1,885 250 245 50.5% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Andrei Chesnokov Paul Haarhuis
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 1985 3–3 50.0% #137 1,546 0 0
20 1986 13–9 59.1% #36 1,733 0 0
21 1987 24–16 60.0% #52 1,802 0 1
22 1988 44–16 73.3% #14 1,884 0 2 1988 0–1 0.0% #462 1,488 0 0
23 1989 30–16 65.2% #22 1,863 0 4 1989 9–7 56.2% #57 1,635 0 0
24 1990 43–20 68.3% #12 1,861 0 6 1990 20–25 44.4% #54 1,668 0 0
25 1991 28–21 57.1% #31 1,781 0 7 1991 25–25 50.0% #37 1,728 0 0
26 1992 28–27 50.9% #30 1,726 0 7 1992 32–28 53.3% #39 1,681 0 0
27 1993 37–28 56.9% #27 1,749 0 7 1993 30–26 53.6% #42 1,762 0 0
28 1994 37–29 56.1% #32 1,773 0 7 1994 26–22 54.2% #37 1,714 0 0
29 1995 14–22 38.9% #89 1,628 0 7 1995 33–24 57.9% #19 1,714 0 1
30 1996 11–20 35.5% #85 1,585 0 7 1996 30–27 52.6% #25 1,746 0 1
31 1997 2–4 33.3% #209 1,571 0 7 1997 19–25 43.2% #70 1,676 0 1
32 1998 2–3 40.0% #494 1,565 0 7 1998 20–20 50.0% #74 1,663 0 1
33 1999 0–1 0.0% #872 1,551 0 7 1999 6–15 28.6% #178 1,620 0 1