H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Andrei Chesnokov vs Peter Doohan H2H: 0-1
Peter Doohan holds a 1–0 lead over Andrei Chesnokov in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Peter Doohan leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Peter Doohan won the 1985 Australian Open first round 6-0 6-1 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 60
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
AUS
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 27, 1985* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Peter Doohan | 6-0 6-1 6-2 | Andrei Chesnokov | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andrei Chesnokov | #709 | #9 | 1,399 | 1,972 | 316 | 235 | 57.4% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 7 |
| Peter Doohan | #1,102 | #43 | 140 | 1,737 | 50 | 82 | 37.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Andrei Chesnokov | Peter Doohan | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #480 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1985 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #137 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1986 | 13–9 | 59.1% | #36 | 1,733 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #549 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1987 | 24–16 | 60.0% | #52 | 1,802 | 0 | 1 | 1982 | 3–3 | 50.0% | — | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1988 | 44–16 | 73.3% | #14 | 1,884 | 0 | 2 | 1983 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #363 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1989 | 30–16 | 65.2% | #22 | 1,863 | 0 | 4 | 1984 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #85 | 1,614 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1990 | 43–20 | 68.3% | #12 | 1,861 | 0 | 6 | 1985 | 18–19 | 48.6% | #101 | 1,683 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1991 | 28–21 | 57.1% | #31 | 1,781 | 0 | 7 | 1986 | 0–7 | 0.0% | #301 | 1,555 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1992 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #30 | 1,726 | 0 | 7 | 1987 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #72 | 1,618 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1993 | 37–28 | 56.9% | #27 | 1,749 | 0 | 7 | 1988 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #187 | 1,485 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1994 | 37–29 | 56.1% | #32 | 1,773 | 0 | 7 | 1989 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #172 | 1,451 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 1995 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #89 | 1,628 | 0 | 7 | 1990 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #331 | 1,435 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 1996 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #85 | 1,585 | 0 | 7 | 1991 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1131 | 1,427 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 1997 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #209 | 1,571 | 0 | 7 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1097 | 1,421 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | 1998 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #494 | 1,565 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1999 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #872 | 1,551 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |