H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Andrei Chesnokov vs Peter Lundgren H2H: 2-3

Peter Lundgren holds a 3–2 lead over Andrei Chesnokov in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Peter Lundgren leads 3–2 on hard courts. Most recently, Andrei Chesnokov won the 1994 Memphis round of 32 6-3 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Andrei Chesnokov
RUS Age 60 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
2 – 3
5 main draw meetings
Peter Lundgren
SWE Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Andrei Chesnokov #25 6-3 6-4 Peter Lundgren #305 Match data Feb 10, 1994* R32 Memphis ATP Championship Series → modern equivalent ATP 500 Hard
Peter Lundgren #55 7-6(6) 4-6 6-3 Andrei Chesnokov #22 Match data Aug 7, 1991* R64 Cincinnati Open Masters 1000 Hard
Peter Lundgren #44 6-4 7-5 Andrei Chesnokov #18 Match data Oct 6, 1989* R32 Swiss Indoors ATP 250 Hard
Andrei Chesnokov #44 6-2 7-5 2-6 6-0 Peter Lundgren #47 Match data Sep 5, 1987* R64 US Open Grand Slam Hard
Peter Lundgren #58 6-3 7-6 Andrei Chesnokov #41 Match data Aug 28, 1987* R16 Rye Brook ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Andrei Chesnokov #709 #9 1,399 1,971 317 237 57.2% 0 2 0 0 5 7
Peter Lundgren #472 #25 619 1,867 119 136 46.7% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Andrei Chesnokov Peter Lundgren
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 1983 1–1 50.0% — 1,515 0 0
19 1985 3–3 50.0% #137 1,547 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1986 13–9 59.1% #36 1,733 0 0 1985 8–4 66.7% #31 1,671 0 1
21 1987 24–16 60.0% #52 1,795 0 1 1986 15–22 40.5% #98 1,640 0 1
22 1988 44–17 72.1% #14 1,870 0 2 1987 28–17 62.2% #26 1,837 0 3
23 1989 30–16 65.2% #22 1,864 0 4 1988 20–21 48.8% #66 1,738 0 3
24 1990 43–20 68.3% #12 1,878 0 6 1989 12–14 46.2% #71 1,703 0 3
25 1991 28–21 57.1% #31 1,784 0 7 1990 15–18 45.5% #65 1,713 0 3
26 1992 29–28 50.9% #30 1,730 0 7 1991 13–25 34.2% #138 1,609 0 3
27 1993 37–28 56.9% #27 1,750 0 7 1992 5–8 38.5% #213 1,579 0 3
28 1994 37–29 56.1% #32 1,772 0 7 1993 0–1 0.0% #254 1,569 0 3
29 1995 14–22 38.9% #89 1,629 0 7 1994 1–4 20.0% #386 1,534 0 3
30 1996 11–20 35.5% #85 1,585 0 7 1995 1–1 50.0% #384 1,535 0 3
31 1997 2–4 33.3% #209 1,572 0 7 — — — — — — —
32 1998 2–3 40.0% #494 1,566 0 7 — — — — — — —
33 1999 0–1 0.0% #872 1,552 0 7 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Andrei Chesnokov Peter Lundgren
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1985 — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1986 5 3 8 62.5% 6 2 8 75.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 1985 8 3 11 72.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
21 1987 6 5 11 54.5% 16 6 22 72.7% — — — — 2 5 7 28.6% 1986 9 10 19 47.4% 0 5 5 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 5 5 10 50.0%
22 1988 24 7 31 77.4% 10 4 14 71.4% 4 2 6 66.7% 6 4 10 60.0% 1987 22 10 32 68.8% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 6 3 9 66.7%
23 1989 11 9 20 55.0% 17 4 21 81.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1988 16 14 30 53.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
24 1990 21 11 32 65.6% 21 6 27 77.8% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% 1989 3 8 11 27.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 7 2 9 77.8% 2 3 5 40.0%
25 1991 11 7 18 61.1% 10 7 17 58.8% — — — — 7 7 14 50.0% 1990 10 7 17 58.8% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 6 9 33.3%
26 1992 17 13 30 56.7% 7 7 14 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 1991 7 13 20 35.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 5 6 16.7%
27 1993 13 10 23 56.5% 20 10 30 66.7% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 1992 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
28 1994 11 11 22 50.0% 19 13 32 59.4% — — — — 7 5 12 58.3% 1993 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1995 3 8 11 27.3% 7 9 16 43.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 1994 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
30 1996 3 9 12 25.0% 7 7 14 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1995 — — — — — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
31 1997 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1998 — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1999 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 127 96 223 57.0% 145 80 225 64.4% 6 14 20 30.0% 39 47 86 45.3% — 81 73 154 52.6% 1 18 19 5.3% 17 17 34 50.0% 20 28 48 41.7%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 277/316 of Andrei Chesnokov's and 50/59 of Peter Lundgren's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Andrei Chesnokov Peter Lundgren
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
25 1991 42/49 2.1 2.1 62.3% 63.5% 52.4% 45.5% 53.1% 59.0% 43.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
26 1992 50/57 3.0 3.3 54.7% 65.5% 47.0% 53.2% 42.8% 57.4% 40.2% 1991 29/38 4.6 5.1 52.7% 68.7% 47.7% 58.6% 41.7% 58.6% 35.2%
27 1993 61/65 2.9 2.6 55.6% 66.2% 50.4% 49.9% 44.3% 59.1% 42.2% 1992 13/13 5.2 4.5 49.9% 71.2% 50.6% 46.2% 36.3% 60.8% 34.3%
28 1994 57/66 2.9 2.7 58.8% 66.1% 47.6% 54.0% 47.5% 58.7% 42.1% 1993 1/1 8.0 4.0 50.0% 74.4% 53.5% 57.1% 18.2% 64.0% 37.3%
29 1995 29/36 3.3 2.8 61.0% 65.8% 49.1% 53.9% 36.0% 59.1% 38.6% 1994 5/5 4.2 4.2 52.0% 63.0% 48.2% 44.9% 30.1% 56.2% 38.3%
30 1996 27/31 2.7 2.9 56.8% 62.0% 45.7% 49.9% 44.7% 54.6% 40.3% 1995 2/2 5.0 2.0 56.8% 74.6% 66.3% 80.0% 50.0% 71.2% 34.3%
31 1997 6/6 3.8 2.7 56.3% 63.0% 44.3% 62.0% 63.2% 54.8% 37.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 1998 4/5 1.3 3.8 59.0% 59.5% 40.9% 54.3% 49.3% 52.0% 41.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 1999 1/1 2.0 3.0 57.4% 51.9% 50.0% 42.9% 0.0% 51.1% 27.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 277/554 2.8 2.7 57.9% 64.9% 48.6% 51.4% 45.5% 58.1% 41.3% — 50/255 4.8 4.7 52.0% 69.1% 49.3% 54.8% 39.0% 59.5% 35.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Andrei Chesnokov Peter Lundgren
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 1515 107.6 — — — — — — — 50.0% +0.75 — 0–1 — -0.11
19 1985 1547 121.7 — — — — — +51 — 55.0% +0.20 0–2 0–1 — +0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1986 1733 139.9 — — — — -84 +19 -231 57.1% +0.44 2–2 (50%) 4–2 (67%) — -0.26 1985 1671 134.7 — — — — +36 — — 58.1% +0.48 4–0 (100%) 3–1 (75%) — -0.03
21 1987 1796 145.6 — — — — -88 +23 — 57.6% +0.46 5–4 (56%) 6–3 (67%) — -0.88 1986 1640 129.6 — — — — +37 -156 -99 41.6% -0.36 5–4 (56%) 3–6 (33%) — +0.30
22 1988 1870 145.9 — — — — +7 +8 -313 64.4% +0.94 12–2 (86%) 9–8 (53%) — +0.32 1987 1837 150.0 — — — — +48 -397 — 58.0% +0.66 7–4 (64%) 6–4 (60%) — +0.26
23 1989 1864 147.5 — — — — -47 +110 — 61.3% +0.79 7–5 (58%) 6–5 (55%) — -1.29 1988 1738 134.2 — — — — +24 — -181 48.5% +0.13 2–4 (33%) 3–6 (33%) — -0.19
24 1990 1878 150.0 — — — — -51 +149 — 63.6% +0.75 12–6 (67%) 17–7 (71%) — +2.31 1989 1703 123.9 — — — — -64 — +20 47.1% -0.34 1–3 (25%) 5–3 (63%) — -0.44
25 1991 1785 146.6 -0.90 +3.53 1.055 51.0% -21 +168 — 54.8% +0.32 10–8 (56%) 3–5 (38%) — +0.62 1990 1713 139.5 — — — — +23 — -6 46.8% -0.09 5–4 (56%) 4–9 (31%) — -0.25
26 1992 1731 142.0 -2.64 +1.87 0.945 49.0% +21 +122 -215 52.0% -0.08 9–13 (41%) 16–11 (59%) — -1.43 1991 1610 134.1 -1.57 -2.37 0.850 47.2% +11 -201 +101 38.8% -0.51 4–6 (40%) 9–7 (56%) — -0.36
27 1993 1751 150.6 -1.34 +3.83 1.032 50.7% -18 +164 -256 53.5% +0.25 12–8 (60%) 14–6 (70%) — -1.46 1992 1580 113.5 -1.29 -1.70 0.876 47.8% +29 — — 37.5% -0.44 3–1 (75%) 1–5 (17%) — +0.85
28 1994 1773 144.3 -2.46 +3.28 1.020 50.4% -21 +36 — 54.1% +0.22 15–11 (58%) 15–6 (71%) — -0.96 1993 1570 104.4 +0.11 -1.94 1.034 49.0% — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 — — -0.01
29 1995 1629 124.4 -2.64 +0.64 0.945 48.7% +12 +110 — 44.0% -0.33 4–6 (40%) 6–9 (40%) — +0.46 1994 1534 101.7 -1.08 -1.39 0.875 47.1% +40 — — 25.0% -1.08 1–1 0–1 — +0.11
30 1996 1586 127.1 -5.11 +1.56 0.888 47.6% -1 +99 — 41.0% -0.58 4–7 (36%) 3–6 (33%) — -0.37 1995 1536 100.9 +2.06 -2.27 1.192 52.6% — — — 50.0% +0.25 — 0–1 — +0.29
31 1997 1573 106.6 -2.39 -0.42 0.838 46.6% -10 — — 42.9% -0.57 1–1 0–1 — +0.22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1998 1566 109.5 -2.05 -0.66 0.859 46.8% — +108 — 36.4% -1.45 — 1–0 — +0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1999 1553 97.0 -0.85 +0.87 0.553 38.9% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.08 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1971 149.2 -2.27 +2.59 0.984 49.7% -20 +96 -265 55.4% +0.31 93–75 (55%) 100–70 (59%) 106.2 -0.47 — 1868 140.9 -1.27 -2.09 0.872 47.6% +23 -231 -8 46.8% -0.06 32–28 (53%) 34–44 (44%) 99.2 +0.16

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.