H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Andrei Chesnokov vs Slava Dosedel H2H: 0-1
Slava Dosedel holds a 1–0 lead over Andrei Chesnokov in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Slava Dosedel leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Slava Dosedel won the 1994 Mexico City third round 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 60
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
CZE
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 24, 1994* | Mexico City | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Slava Dosedel | 6-2 6-3 | Andrei Chesnokov | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andrei Chesnokov | #709 | #9 | 1,399 | 1,972 | 316 | 235 | 57.4% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 7 |
| Slava Dosedel | #1,027 | #26 | 1,122 | 1,825 | 190 | 184 | 50.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Andrei Chesnokov | Slava Dosedel | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1985 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #137 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #265 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 |
| 1986 | 13–9 | 59.1% | #36 | 1,733 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #146 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 |
| 1987 | 24–16 | 60.0% | #52 | 1,802 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #201 | 1,444 | 0 | 0 |
| 1988 | 44–16 | 73.3% | #14 | 1,884 | 0 | 2 | 1992 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #159 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 1989 | 30–16 | 65.2% | #22 | 1,863 | 0 | 4 | 1993 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #68 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 |
| 1990 | 43–20 | 68.3% | #12 | 1,861 | 0 | 6 | 1994 | 36–23 | 61.0% | #29 | 1,731 | 0 | 0 |
| 1991 | 28–21 | 57.1% | #31 | 1,781 | 0 | 7 | 1995 | 27–25 | 51.9% | #60 | 1,695 | 0 | 1 |
| 1992 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #30 | 1,726 | 0 | 7 | 1996 | 21–13 | 61.8% | #66 | 1,769 | 0 | 2 |
| 1993 | 37–28 | 56.9% | #27 | 1,749 | 0 | 7 | 1997 | 24–18 | 57.1% | #43 | 1,762 | 0 | 3 |
| 1994 | 37–29 | 56.1% | #32 | 1,773 | 0 | 7 | 1998 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #64 | 1,690 | 0 | 3 |
| 1995 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #89 | 1,628 | 0 | 7 | 1999 | 15–12 | 55.6% | #63 | 1,741 | 0 | 3 |
| 1996 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #85 | 1,585 | 0 | 7 | 2000 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #64 | 1,722 | 0 | 3 |
| 1997 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #209 | 1,571 | 0 | 7 | 2001 | 5–16 | 23.8% | #152 | 1,575 | 0 | 3 |
| 1998 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #494 | 1,565 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1999 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #872 | 1,551 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |