Andrei Chesnokov
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jim Courier | 5 | 4 | 9 | Oct 22, 1994 | H2H |
| Michael Stich | 3 | 6 | 9 | May 7, 1994 | H2H |
| Henri Leconte | 0 | 8 | 8 | Apr 19, 1991 | H2H |
| Karel Novacek | 4 | 3 | 7 | Apr 13, 1995 | H2H |
| Jaime Yzaga | 5 | 2 | 7 | Apr 14, 1994 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-05 00:00 UTC
Stefan Edberg holds a 5–1 lead over Andrei Chesnokov in their ATP head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Stefan Edberg leads 2–1 on clay and 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Stefan Edberg won the 1993 Nice round of 16 7-6(3) 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stefan Edberg | 7-6(3) 6-2 | Andrei Chesnokov | Match data | Apr 16, 1993* | R16 | Nice | ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 | Clay |
| Andrei Chesnokov | 6-0 6-4 6-4 | Stefan Edberg | Match data | Jul 31, 1992* | R64 | Barcelona Olympics | Olympics | Clay |
| Stefan Edberg | 6-1 7-5 6-2 | Andrei Chesnokov | Match data | Jan 22, 1992* | R16 | Australian Open | Grand Slam | Hard |
| Stefan Edberg | 6-1 6-4 6-3 | Andrei Chesnokov | Match data | Jun 2, 1991* | R32 | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | Clay |
| Stefan Edberg | 6-2 6-3 | Andrei Chesnokov | Match data | Nov 2, 1989* | R32 | Paris Masters | ATP 250 | Carpet |
| Stefan Edberg | 4-6 7-6 6-4 6-4 | Andrei Chesnokov | Match data | Jan 22, 1988* | QF | Australian Open | Grand Slam | Hard |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andrei Chesnokov | #709 | #9 | 1,399 | 1,971 | 317 | 237 | 57.2% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 7 |
| Stefan Edberg | #1,347 | #1 | 3,997 | 2,237 | 748 | 248 | 75.1% | 6 | 4 | 1 | 9 | 21 | 41 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Andrei Chesnokov | Stefan Edberg | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,463 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 12–10 | 54.5% | #54 | 1,616 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 27–18 | 60.0% | #20 | 1,825 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 1985 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #137 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 58–17 | 77.3% | #5 | 2,130 | 1 | 5 |
| 20 | 1986 | 13–9 | 59.1% | #36 | 1,733 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 66–20 | 76.7% | #5 | 2,124 | 1 | 8 |
| 21 | 1987 | 24–16 | 60.0% | #52 | 1,795 | 0 | 1 | 1987 | 75–12 | 86.2% | #2 | 2,208 | 2 | 15 |
| 22 | 1988 | 44–17 | 72.1% | #14 | 1,870 | 0 | 2 | 1988 | 58–16 | 78.4% | #5 | 2,077 | 3 | 18 |
| 23 | 1989 | 30–16 | 65.2% | #22 | 1,864 | 0 | 4 | 1989 | 58–16 | 78.4% | #3 | 2,154 | 3 | 20 |
| 24 | 1990 | 43–20 | 68.3% | #12 | 1,878 | 0 | 6 | 1990 | 67–13 | 83.8% | #1 | 2,175 | 4 | 27 |
| 25 | 1991 | 28–21 | 57.1% | #31 | 1,784 | 0 | 7 | 1991 | 73–14 | 83.9% | #1 | 2,147 | 5 | 33 |
| 26 | 1992 | 29–28 | 50.9% | #30 | 1,730 | 0 | 7 | 1992 | 64–20 | 76.2% | #2 | 2,035 | 6 | 36 |
| 27 | 1993 | 37–28 | 56.9% | #27 | 1,750 | 0 | 7 | 1993 | 58–22 | 72.5% | #5 | 1,986 | 6 | 37 |
| 28 | 1994 | 37–29 | 56.1% | #32 | 1,772 | 0 | 7 | 1994 | 53–23 | 69.7% | #7 | 1,873 | 6 | 40 |
| 29 | 1995 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #89 | 1,629 | 0 | 7 | 1995 | 35–19 | 64.8% | #23 | 1,827 | 6 | 41 |
| 30 | 1996 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #85 | 1,585 | 0 | 7 | 1996 | 44–25 | 63.8% | #14 | 1,887 | 6 | 41 |
| 31 | 1997 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #209 | 1,572 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1998 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #494 | 1,566 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1999 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #872 | 1,552 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Andrei Chesnokov | Stefan Edberg | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 6 | 5 | 11 | 54.5% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 9 | 5 | 14 | 64.3% | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 9 | 6 | 15 | 60.0% |
| 19 | 1985 | — | — | — | — | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 25 | 7 | 32 | 78.1% | 8 | 2 | 10 | 80.0% | 9 | 1 | 10 | 90.0% | 16 | 7 | 23 | 69.6% |
| 20 | 1986 | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | 6 | 2 | 8 | 75.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 1986 | 32 | 5 | 37 | 86.5% | 12 | 3 | 15 | 80.0% | 6 | 2 | 8 | 75.0% | 16 | 10 | 26 | 61.5% |
| 21 | 1987 | 6 | 5 | 11 | 54.5% | 16 | 6 | 22 | 72.7% | — | — | — | — | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 1987 | 42 | 5 | 47 | 89.4% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | 14 | 2 | 16 | 87.5% | 14 | 2 | 16 | 87.5% |
| 22 | 1988 | 24 | 7 | 31 | 77.4% | 10 | 4 | 14 | 71.4% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | 6 | 4 | 10 | 60.0% | 1988 | 28 | 9 | 37 | 75.7% | 6 | 2 | 8 | 75.0% | 12 | 1 | 13 | 92.3% | 12 | 4 | 16 | 75.0% |
| 23 | 1989 | 11 | 9 | 20 | 55.0% | 17 | 4 | 21 | 81.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 1989 | 29 | 7 | 36 | 80.6% | 9 | 2 | 11 | 81.8% | 6 | 2 | 8 | 75.0% | 14 | 5 | 19 | 73.7% |
| 24 | 1990 | 21 | 11 | 32 | 65.6% | 21 | 6 | 27 | 77.8% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 1990 | 39 | 5 | 44 | 88.6% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 10 | 1 | 11 | 90.9% | 16 | 4 | 20 | 80.0% |
| 25 | 1991 | 11 | 7 | 18 | 61.1% | 10 | 7 | 17 | 58.8% | — | — | — | — | 7 | 7 | 14 | 50.0% | 1991 | 39 | 7 | 46 | 84.8% | 6 | 3 | 9 | 66.7% | 10 | 1 | 11 | 90.9% | 18 | 3 | 21 | 85.7% |
| 26 | 1992 | 17 | 13 | 30 | 56.7% | 7 | 7 | 14 | 50.0% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 1992 | 32 | 6 | 38 | 84.2% | 9 | 3 | 12 | 75.0% | 7 | 2 | 9 | 77.8% | 16 | 9 | 25 | 64.0% |
| 27 | 1993 | 13 | 10 | 23 | 56.5% | 20 | 10 | 30 | 66.7% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | 1993 | 24 | 9 | 33 | 72.7% | 16 | 4 | 20 | 80.0% | 7 | 2 | 9 | 77.8% | 11 | 7 | 18 | 61.1% |
| 28 | 1994 | 11 | 11 | 22 | 50.0% | 19 | 13 | 32 | 59.4% | — | — | — | — | 7 | 5 | 12 | 58.3% | 1994 | 31 | 9 | 40 | 77.5% | 8 | 5 | 13 | 61.5% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 11 | 7 | 18 | 61.1% |
| 29 | 1995 | 3 | 8 | 11 | 27.3% | 7 | 9 | 16 | 43.8% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 1995 | 26 | 11 | 37 | 70.3% | 6 | 4 | 10 | 60.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% |
| 30 | 1996 | 3 | 9 | 12 | 25.0% | 7 | 7 | 14 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 1996 | 18 | 12 | 30 | 60.0% | 14 | 7 | 21 | 66.7% | 6 | 2 | 8 | 75.0% | 6 | 4 | 10 | 60.0% |
| 31 | 1997 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1998 | — | — | — | — | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1999 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 127 | 96 | 223 | 57.0% | 145 | 80 | 225 | 64.4% | 6 | 14 | 20 | 30.0% | 39 | 47 | 86 | 45.3% | — | 380 | 104 | 484 | 78.5% | 110 | 48 | 158 | 69.6% | 98 | 26 | 124 | 79.0% | 160 | 70 | 230 | 69.6% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 277/316 of Andrei Chesnokov's and 392/450 of Stefan Edberg's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Andrei Chesnokov | Stefan Edberg | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 25 | 1991 | 42/49 | 2.1 | 2.1 | 62.3% | 63.5% | 52.4% | 45.5% | 53.1% | 59.0% | 43.2% | 1991 | 77/87 | 3.0 | 2.9 | 63.0% | 75.5% | 56.0% | 60.7% | 45.0% | 68.3% | 43.6% |
| 26 | 1992 | 50/57 | 3.0 | 3.3 | 54.7% | 65.5% | 47.0% | 53.2% | 42.8% | 57.4% | 40.2% | 1992 | 75/84 | 3.5 | 3.6 | 63.9% | 74.6% | 54.9% | 64.0% | 45.3% | 67.4% | 40.6% |
| 27 | 1993 | 61/65 | 2.9 | 2.6 | 55.6% | 66.2% | 50.4% | 49.9% | 44.3% | 59.1% | 42.2% | 1993 | 63/80 | 2.9 | 4.6 | 60.3% | 73.6% | 51.0% | 59.4% | 47.5% | 64.4% | 42.1% |
| 28 | 1994 | 57/66 | 2.9 | 2.7 | 58.8% | 66.1% | 47.6% | 54.0% | 47.5% | 58.7% | 42.1% | 1994 | 62/76 | 2.8 | 3.6 | 62.4% | 72.9% | 53.8% | 61.0% | 47.0% | 65.7% | 41.8% |
| 29 | 1995 | 29/36 | 3.3 | 2.8 | 61.0% | 65.8% | 49.1% | 53.9% | 36.0% | 59.1% | 38.6% | 1995 | 52/54 | 3.0 | 3.6 | 61.0% | 72.5% | 49.2% | 60.5% | 46.4% | 63.6% | 41.6% |
| 30 | 1996 | 27/31 | 2.7 | 2.9 | 56.8% | 62.0% | 45.7% | 49.9% | 44.7% | 54.6% | 40.3% | 1996 | 63/69 | 3.9 | 4.1 | 59.0% | 72.3% | 52.5% | 58.8% | 41.9% | 64.0% | 41.0% |
| 31 | 1997 | 6/6 | 3.8 | 2.7 | 56.3% | 63.0% | 44.3% | 62.0% | 63.2% | 54.8% | 37.9% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1998 | 4/5 | 1.3 | 3.8 | 59.0% | 59.5% | 40.9% | 54.3% | 49.3% | 52.0% | 41.3% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1999 | 1/1 | 2.0 | 3.0 | 57.4% | 51.9% | 50.0% | 42.9% | 0.0% | 51.1% | 27.1% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 277/554 | 2.8 | 2.7 | 57.9% | 64.9% | 48.6% | 51.4% | 45.5% | 58.1% | 41.3% | — | 392/996 | 3.2 | 3.7 | 61.7% | 73.7% | 53.2% | 60.9% | 45.5% | 65.8% | 41.8% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Andrei Chesnokov | Stefan Edberg | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 1464 | 96.7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 25.0% | -2.62 | 0–2 | 1–0 | — | +0.35 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 1617 | 133.1 | — | — | — | — | +5 | -20 | -83 | 52.8% | +0.21 | 2–2 (50%) | 3–4 (43%) | 101.5 | +0.10 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 1826 | 153.7 | — | — | — | — | -28 | -162 | -156 | 60.9% | +0.75 | 5–7 (42%) | 11–11 (50%) | 100.7 | -0.06 |
| 19 | 1985 | 1547 | 121.7 | — | — | — | — | — | +51 | — | 55.0% | +0.20 | 0–2 | 0–1 | — | +0.06 | 1985 | 2130 | 166.9 | — | — | — | — | -89 | -335 | -173 | 72.7% | +1.45 | 7–8 (47%) | 19–14 (58%) | 100.1 | -3.55 |
| 20 | 1986 | 1733 | 139.9 | — | — | — | — | -84 | +19 | -231 | 57.1% | +0.44 | 2–2 (50%) | 4–2 (67%) | 103.6 | -0.26 | 1986 | 2125 | 164.5 | — | — | — | — | +27 | -250 | -162 | 69.7% | +1.52 | 18–7 (72%) | 19–13 (59%) | 101.9 | -1.90 |
| 21 | 1987 | 1796 | 145.6 | — | — | — | — | -88 | +23 | — | 57.6% | +0.46 | 5–4 (56%) | 6–3 (67%) | 102.4 | -0.88 | 1987 | 2209 | 172.3 | — | — | — | — | +77 | -360 | -99 | 77.7% | +1.92 | 13–3 (81%) | 19–16 (54%) | 104.3 | -3.18 |
| 22 | 1988 | 1870 | 145.9 | — | — | — | — | +7 | +8 | -313 | 64.4% | +0.94 | 12–2 (86%) | 9–8 (53%) | 108.9 | +0.32 | 1988 | 2077 | 159.9 | — | — | — | — | +31 | -199 | +95 | 72.3% | +1.37 | 14–8 (64%) | 16–8 (67%) | 100.2 | -2.31 |
| 23 | 1989 | 1864 | 147.5 | — | — | — | — | -47 | +110 | — | 61.3% | +0.79 | 7–5 (58%) | 6–5 (55%) | 99.6 | -1.29 | 1989 | 2155 | 169.3 | — | — | — | — | +39 | -186 | +7 | 73.0% | +1.25 | 10–5 (67%) | 18–9 (67%) | 106.9 | -6.13 |
| 24 | 1990 | 1878 | 150.0 | — | — | — | — | -51 | +149 | — | 63.6% | +0.75 | 12–6 (67%) | 17–7 (71%) | 106.7 | +2.31 | 1990 | 2176 | 173.1 | — | — | — | — | +30 | -272 | +103 | 74.5% | +1.68 | 16–1 (94%) | 19–10 (66%) | 108.6 | -4.50 |
| 25 | 1991 | 1785 | 146.6 | -0.90 | +3.53 | 1.055 | 51.0% | -21 | +168 | — | 54.8% | +0.32 | 10–8 (56%) | 3–5 (38%) | 97.6 | +0.62 | 1991 | 2148 | 168.6 | +6.92 | +5.37 | 1.372 | 55.2% | +61 | -218 | +146 | 78.7% | +1.85 | 12–7 (63%) | 18–9 (67%) | 98.6 | -1.02 |
| 26 | 1992 | 1731 | 142.0 | -2.64 | +1.87 | 0.945 | 49.0% | +21 | +122 | -215 | 52.0% | -0.08 | 9–13 (41%) | 16–11 (59%) | 95.7 | -1.43 | 1992 | 2036 | 166.3 | +5.64 | +3.53 | 1.246 | 53.7% | +37 | -92 | +216 | 68.9% | +1.22 | 17–10 (63%) | 29–14 (67%) | 101.4 | +0.13 |
| 27 | 1993 | 1751 | 150.6 | -1.34 | +3.83 | 1.032 | 50.7% | -18 | +164 | -256 | 53.5% | +0.25 | 12–8 (60%) | 14–6 (70%) | 110.2 | -1.46 | 1993 | 1987 | 165.8 | +3.09 | +4.76 | 1.184 | 52.9% | +16 | +31 | +233 | 67.6% | +1.11 | 15–9 (63%) | 24–13 (65%) | 101.9 | -2.70 |
| 28 | 1994 | 1773 | 144.3 | -2.46 | +3.28 | 1.020 | 50.4% | -21 | +36 | — | 54.1% | +0.22 | 15–11 (58%) | 15–6 (71%) | 108.6 | -0.96 | 1994 | 1874 | 159.8 | +4.24 | +3.69 | 1.218 | 53.6% | +60 | +64 | +297 | 67.4% | +1.26 | 11–10 (52%) | 13–11 (54%) | 94.3 | +1.11 |
| 29 | 1995 | 1629 | 124.4 | -2.64 | +0.64 | 0.945 | 48.7% | +12 | +110 | — | 44.0% | -0.33 | 4–6 (40%) | 6–9 (40%) | 93.7 | +0.46 | 1995 | 1827 | 152.9 | +1.63 | +3.73 | 1.143 | 52.1% | +69 | +91 | +198 | 60.3% | +0.83 | 12–7 (63%) | 13–7 (65%) | 101.7 | +0.90 |
| 30 | 1996 | 1586 | 127.1 | -5.11 | +1.56 | 0.888 | 47.6% | -1 | +99 | — | 41.0% | -0.58 | 4–7 (36%) | 3–6 (33%) | 94.7 | -0.37 | 1996 | 1888 | 152.3 | +2.04 | +3.83 | 1.139 | 52.1% | -26 | +12 | +184 | 60.6% | +0.82 | 9–9 (50%) | 13–17 (43%) | 91.4 | -2.82 |
| 31 | 1997 | 1573 | 106.6 | -2.39 | -0.42 | 0.838 | 46.6% | -10 | — | — | 42.9% | -0.57 | 1–1 | 0–1 | — | +0.22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1998 | 1566 | 109.5 | -2.05 | -0.66 | 0.859 | 46.8% | — | +108 | — | 36.4% | -1.45 | — | 1–0 | — | +0.01 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1999 | 1553 | 97.0 | -0.85 | +0.87 | 0.553 | 38.9% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -4.00 | — | — | — | +0.08 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 1971 | 149.2 | -2.27 | +2.59 | 0.984 | 49.7% | -20 | +96 | -265 | 55.4% | +0.31 | 93–75 (55%) | 100–70 (59%) | 106.2 | -0.47 | — | 2237 | 168.9 | +4.15 | +4.19 | 1.222 | 53.4% | +27 | -108 | +46 | 69.9% | +1.32 | 161–95 (63%) | 235–156 (60%) | 102.1 | -2.58 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jim Courier | 5 | 4 | 9 | Oct 22, 1994 | H2H |
| Michael Stich | 3 | 6 | 9 | May 7, 1994 | H2H |
| Henri Leconte | 0 | 8 | 8 | Apr 19, 1991 | H2H |
| Karel Novacek | 4 | 3 | 7 | Apr 13, 1995 | H2H |
| Jaime Yzaga | 5 | 2 | 7 | Apr 14, 1994 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Boris Becker | 10 | 22 | 32 | Jun 16, 1996 | H2H |
| Ivan Lendl | 14 | 13 | 27 | Sep 11, 1992 | H2H |
| Michael Chang | 12 | 9 | 21 | Aug 3, 1996 | H2H |
| Mats Wilander | 9 | 11 | 20 | Jul 27, 1995 | H2H |
| Brad Gilbert | 15 | 4 | 19 | Aug 26, 1993 | H2H |