H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 01:16 UTC

Andrei Chesnokov vs Thomas Muster H2H: 2-4

Thomas Muster holds a 4–2 lead over Andrei Chesnokov in their ATP head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Thomas Muster leads 3–2 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Andrei Chesnokov won the 1994 Stuttgart Outdoor quarterfinal 6-3 4-6 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Andrei Chesnokov
RUS Age 60 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
2 – 4
6 main draw meetings
Thomas Muster
AUT Age 58 Left-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jul 23, 1994* Stuttgart Outdoor ATP 250 QF Clay Andrei Chesnokov #36 6-3 4-6 6-4 Thomas Muster #10 Match data
Apr 22, 1993* Monte Carlo Masters Masters 1000 R32 Clay Thomas Muster #12 6-2 6-2 Andrei Chesnokov #57 Match data
Apr 8, 1993* Barcelona ATP 250 R32 Clay Thomas Muster #15 7-5 0-6 7-5 Andrei Chesnokov #58 Match data
May 21, 1990* Rome Masters Masters 1000 F Clay Thomas Muster #9 6-1 6-3 6-1 Andrei Chesnokov #10 Match data
Apr 30, 1990* Monte Carlo Masters Masters 1000 F Clay Andrei Chesnokov #12 7-5 6-3 6-3 Thomas Muster #19 Match data
Feb 25, 1987* Key Biscayne Masters 1000 R64 Hard Thomas Muster #47 6-4 7-5 6-3 Andrei Chesnokov #39 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Andrei Chesnokov #709 #9 1,399 1,972 316 235 57.4% 0 2 0 0 5 7
Thomas Muster #1,092 #1 4,474 2,161 590 267 68.8% 1 8 0 0 35 44

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Andrei Chesnokov Thomas Muster
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1984 2–2 50.0% #311 1,533 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1985 9–8 52.9% #98 1,611 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1986 18–16 52.9% #47 1,740 0 1
19 1985 3–3 50.0% #137 1,546 0 0 1987 22–16 57.9% #56 1,753 0 1
20 1986 13–9 59.1% #36 1,733 0 0 1988 47–16 74.6% #16 1,914 0 5
21 1987 24–16 60.0% #52 1,802 0 1 1989 18–10 64.3% #21 1,877 0 5
22 1988 44–16 73.3% #14 1,884 0 2 1990 45–17 72.6% #7 1,862 0 8
23 1989 30–16 65.2% #22 1,863 0 4 1991 30–18 62.5% #35 1,835 0 10
24 1990 43–20 68.3% #12 1,861 0 6 1992 39–22 63.9% #18 1,793 0 13
25 1991 28–21 57.1% #31 1,781 0 7 1993 77–21 78.6% #9 1,953 0 20
26 1992 28–27 50.9% #30 1,726 0 7 1994 54–26 67.5% #16 1,815 0 23
27 1993 37–28 56.9% #27 1,749 0 7 1995 84–17 83.2% #3 1,990 1 35
28 1994 37–29 56.1% #32 1,773 0 7 1996 65–21 75.6% #5 1,915 1 42
29 1995 14–22 38.9% #89 1,628 0 7 1997 43–23 65.2% #9 1,820 1 44
30 1996 11–20 35.5% #85 1,585 0 7 1998 32–20 61.5% #25 1,800 1 44
31 1997 2–4 33.3% #209 1,571 0 7 1999 5–11 31.2% #189 1,674 1 44
32 1998 2–3 40.0% #494 1,565 0 7 — — — — — — —
33 1999 0–1 0.0% #872 1,551 0 7 — — — — — — —
42 — — — — — — — 2010 0–1 0.0% #980 1,655 1 44
43 — — — — — — — 2011 0–2 0.0% #1075 1,608 1 44