H2H data updated: 2026-09-06 00:00 UTC

Andrei Chesnokov vs Todd Martin H2H: 1-2

Todd Martin holds a 2–1 lead over Andrei Chesnokov in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Todd Martin leads 1–0 on carpet, while Andrei Chesnokov leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Todd Martin won the 1995 Montpellier Open round of 32 7-6(5) 7-6(3).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Andrei Chesnokov
RUS Age 60 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1 – 2
3 main-draw meetings
Todd Martin
USA Age 56 Right-Handed 198 cm / 6'6"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Todd Martin #20 7-6(5) 7-6(3) Andrei Chesnokov #76 Match data Oct 19, 1995* R32 Montpellier Open ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Carpet
Andrei Chesnokov #44 6-2 6-2 6-4 Todd Martin #14 Match data Jun 4, 1995* R32 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay
Todd Martin #9 6-3 6-2 7-5 Andrei Chesnokov #39 Match data Sep 2, 1994* R64 US Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Andrei Chesnokov #709 #9 1,399 1,971 317 237 57.2% 0 2 0 0 5 7
Todd Martin #145 #4 2,969 2,064 398 223 64.1% 0 0 0 3 5 8

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Andrei Chesnokov Todd Martin
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 1985 3–3 50.0% #137 1,547 0 0 1990 3–4 42.9% #269 1,515 0 0
20 1986 13–9 59.1% #36 1,733 0 0 1991 10–8 55.6% #134 1,652 0 0
21 1987 24–16 60.0% #52 1,795 0 1 1992 22–19 53.7% #87 1,724 0 0
22 1988 44–17 72.1% #14 1,870 0 2 1993 45–23 66.2% #13 1,886 0 1
23 1989 30–16 65.2% #22 1,864 0 4 1994 50–19 72.5% #10 1,945 0 3
24 1990 43–20 68.3% #12 1,878 0 6 1995 45–21 68.2% #18 1,913 0 4
25 1991 28–21 57.1% #31 1,784 0 7 1996 49–20 71.0% #12 1,923 0 5
26 1992 29–28 50.9% #30 1,730 0 7 1997 13–7 65.0% #81 1,913 0 5
27 1993 37–28 56.9% #27 1,750 0 7 1998 43–20 68.3% #16 1,998 0 7
28 1994 37–29 56.1% #32 1,772 0 7 1999 42–17 71.2% #7 1,914 0 8
29 1995 14–22 38.9% #89 1,629 0 7 2000 14–12 53.8% #55 1,862 0 8
30 1996 11–20 35.5% #85 1,585 0 7 2001 13–11 54.2% #57 1,816 0 8
31 1997 2–4 33.3% #209 1,572 0 7 2002 24–16 60.0% #47 1,785 0 8
32 1998 2–3 40.0% #494 1,566 0 7 2003 15–11 57.7% #68 1,842 0 8
33 1999 0–1 0.0% #872 1,552 0 7 2004 10–15 40.0% #145 1,688 0 8

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Andrei Chesnokov Todd Martin
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
19 1985 — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1990 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
20 1986 5 3 8 62.5% 6 2 8 75.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 1991 2 3 5 40.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
21 1987 6 5 11 54.5% 16 6 22 72.7% — — — — 2 5 7 28.6% 1992 12 10 22 54.5% 3 3 6 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 3 6 50.0%
22 1988 24 7 31 77.4% 10 4 14 71.4% 4 2 6 66.7% 6 4 10 60.0% 1993 21 12 33 63.6% 10 4 14 71.4% 8 2 10 80.0% 6 5 11 54.5%
23 1989 11 9 20 55.0% 17 4 21 81.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1994 22 8 30 73.3% 10 4 14 71.4% 10 1 11 90.9% 8 6 14 57.1%
24 1990 21 11 32 65.6% 21 6 27 77.8% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% 1995 25 10 35 71.4% 7 4 11 63.6% 4 2 6 66.7% 9 5 14 64.3%
25 1991 11 7 18 61.1% 10 7 17 58.8% — — — — 7 7 14 50.0% 1996 29 10 39 74.4% 6 4 10 60.0% 7 2 9 77.8% 7 4 11 63.6%
26 1992 17 13 30 56.7% 7 7 14 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 1997 7 3 10 70.0% — — — — — — — — 6 4 10 60.0%
27 1993 13 10 23 56.5% 20 10 30 66.7% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 1998 26 12 38 68.4% 7 3 10 70.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 7 3 10 70.0%
28 1994 11 11 22 50.0% 19 13 32 59.4% — — — — 7 5 12 58.3% 1999 30 11 41 73.2% 7 2 9 77.8% 5 2 7 71.4% 0 2 2 0.0%
29 1995 3 8 11 27.3% 7 9 16 43.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 2000 11 7 18 61.1% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
30 1996 3 9 12 25.0% 7 7 14 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2001 8 6 14 57.1% 2 4 6 33.3% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — —
31 1997 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2002 17 11 28 60.7% 3 3 6 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
32 1998 — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — 2003 10 7 17 58.8% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
33 1999 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2004 5 9 14 35.7% 3 4 7 42.9% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
Career — 127 96 223 57.0% 145 80 225 64.4% 6 14 20 30.0% 39 47 86 45.3% — 227 122 349 65.0% 64 42 106 60.4% 59 25 84 70.2% 48 34 82 58.5%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 277/316 of Andrei Chesnokov's and 49/51 of Todd Martin's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Andrei Chesnokov Todd Martin
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
25 1991 42/49 2.1 2.1 62.3% 63.5% 52.4% 45.5% 53.1% 59.0% 43.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
26 1992 50/57 3.0 3.3 54.7% 65.5% 47.0% 53.2% 42.8% 57.4% 40.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 1993 61/65 2.9 2.6 55.6% 66.2% 50.4% 49.9% 44.3% 59.1% 42.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
28 1994 57/66 2.9 2.7 58.8% 66.1% 47.6% 54.0% 47.5% 58.7% 42.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 1995 29/36 3.3 2.8 61.0% 65.8% 49.1% 53.9% 36.0% 59.1% 38.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 1996 27/31 2.7 2.9 56.8% 62.0% 45.7% 49.9% 44.7% 54.6% 40.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 1997 6/6 3.8 2.7 56.3% 63.0% 44.3% 62.0% 63.2% 54.8% 37.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 1998 4/5 1.3 3.8 59.0% 59.5% 40.9% 54.3% 49.3% 52.0% 41.3% 2003 24/26 10.0 5.2 58.9% 77.1% 51.2% 63.9% 49.9% 66.4% 36.8%
33 1999 1/1 2.0 3.0 57.4% 51.9% 50.0% 42.9% 0.0% 51.1% 27.1% 2004 25/25 10.5 4.1 62.5% 75.3% 49.7% 57.7% 31.7% 65.7% 35.3%
Career — 277/554 2.8 2.7 57.9% 64.9% 48.6% 51.4% 45.5% 58.1% 41.3% — 49/621 10.3 4.6 60.8% 76.2% 50.4% 60.7% 40.6% 66.1% 36.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Andrei Chesnokov Todd Martin
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
19 1985 1547 121.7 — — — — — +51 — 55.0% +0.20 0–2 0–1 — +0.06 1990 1516 114.1 — — — — +28 — — 40.0% 0.00 2–0 0–4 (0%) — +0.50
20 1986 1733 139.9 — — — — -84 +19 -231 57.1% +0.44 2–2 (50%) 4–2 (67%) 103.6 -0.26 1991 1652 125.4 — — — — -62 -40 -7 55.8% +0.56 2–3 (40%) 3–3 (50%) 100.0 +1.12
21 1987 1796 145.6 — — — — -88 +23 — 57.6% +0.46 5–4 (56%) 6–3 (67%) 102.4 -0.88 1992 1724 141.4 — — — — -19 -110 -46 55.8% +0.54 4–9 (31%) 8–8 (50%) 97.1 +0.21
22 1988 1870 145.9 — — — — +7 +8 -313 64.4% +0.94 12–2 (86%) 9–8 (53%) 108.9 +0.32 1993 1887 155.8 — — — — -16 -193 -64 62.4% +0.78 10–9 (53%) 16–17 (48%) 100.9 -0.69
23 1989 1864 147.5 — — — — -47 +110 — 61.3% +0.79 7–5 (58%) 6–5 (55%) 99.6 -1.29 1994 1945 157.2 — — — — -18 -177 +80 64.0% +0.94 19–8 (70%) 26–17 (60%) 107.1 -1.38
24 1990 1878 150.0 — — — — -51 +149 — 63.6% +0.75 12–6 (67%) 17–7 (71%) 106.7 +2.31 1995 1913 152.5 — — — — +27 -141 +46 62.5% +0.71 11–4 (73%) 20–12 (63%) 108.7 -0.11
25 1991 1785 146.6 -0.90 +3.53 1.055 51.0% -21 +168 — 54.8% +0.32 10–8 (56%) 3–5 (38%) 97.6 +0.62 1996 1923 161.1 — — — — +26 -122 +82 66.3% +1.07 11–10 (52%) 15–12 (56%) 98.3 -1.56
26 1992 1731 142.0 -2.64 +1.87 0.945 49.0% +21 +122 -215 52.0% -0.08 9–13 (41%) 16–11 (59%) 95.7 -1.43 1997 1914 152.5 — — — — +27 — — 63.3% +0.53 2–4 (33%) 6–3 (67%) 97.1 -1.34
27 1993 1751 150.6 -1.34 +3.83 1.032 50.7% -18 +164 -256 53.5% +0.25 12–8 (60%) 14–6 (70%) 110.2 -1.46 1998 1999 161.9 — — — — +10 -105 -16 64.0% +0.82 12–7 (63%) 19–11 (63%) 106.8 -4.34
28 1994 1773 144.3 -2.46 +3.28 1.020 50.4% -21 +36 — 54.1% +0.22 15–11 (58%) 15–6 (71%) 108.6 -0.96 1999 1914 156.7 — — — — +32 +22 +54 63.2% +0.70 14–10 (58%) 26–16 (62%) 99.2 -0.18
29 1995 1629 124.4 -2.64 +0.64 0.945 48.7% +12 +110 — 44.0% -0.33 4–6 (40%) 6–9 (40%) 93.7 +0.46 2000 1862 141.9 — — — — +57 +9 +96 54.5% +0.48 3–4 (43%) 7–10 (41%) 93.4 -0.87
30 1996 1586 127.1 -5.11 +1.56 0.888 47.6% -1 +99 — 41.0% -0.58 4–7 (36%) 3–6 (33%) 94.7 -0.37 2001 1816 132.4 — — — — +63 -59 +147 51.3% -0.17 6–3 (67%) 6–5 (55%) 100.3 -0.33
31 1997 1573 106.6 -2.39 -0.42 0.838 46.6% -10 — — 42.9% -0.57 1–1 0–1 — +0.22 2002 1786 147.1 — — — — +51 -34 +125 58.3% +0.40 6–6 (50%) 14–10 (58%) 98.5 -2.19
32 1998 1566 109.5 -2.05 -0.66 0.859 46.8% — +108 — 36.4% -1.45 — 1–0 — +0.01 2003 1842 133.5 +2.69 +0.10 1.096 51.8% +8 -108 +98 61.8% +0.46 1–5 (17%) 9–6 (60%) 94.9 -0.41
33 1999 1553 97.0 -0.85 +0.87 0.553 38.9% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.08 2004 1688 130.3 +1.82 +0.03 1.029 50.4% +23 +23 +195 43.8% -0.21 5–6 (45%) 10–9 (53%) 98.0 -1.17
Career — 1971 149.2 -2.27 +2.59 0.984 49.7% -20 +96 -265 55.4% +0.31 93–75 (55%) 100–70 (59%) 106.2 -0.47 — 2064 158.1 +2.25 +0.06 1.062 51.1% +15 -99 +51 60.5% +0.64 108–88 (55%) 185–143 (56%) 101.2 -2.06

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.