H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Andrei Chesnokov vs Tomas Carbonell H2H: 3-1

Andrei Chesnokov holds a 3–1 lead over Tomas Carbonell in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Andrei Chesnokov leads 3–1 on clay. Most recently, Tomas Carbonell won the 1996 Casablanca semifinal 6-4 4-6 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Andrei Chesnokov
RUS Age 60 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
3 – 1
4 main draw meetings
Tomas Carbonell
ESP Age 57 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Mar 30, 1996* Casablanca ATP 250 SF Clay Tomas Carbonell #62 6-4 4-6 6-1 Andrei Chesnokov #86 Match data
Jul 13, 1990* Gstaad ATP 250 R16 Clay Andrei Chesnokov #11 7-5 6-3 Tomas Carbonell #78 Match data
Apr 26, 1990* Monte Carlo Masters Masters 1000 R32 Clay Andrei Chesnokov #20 4-1 (ret.) Tomas Carbonell #54 Match data
May 29, 1987* Roland Garros Grand Slam R64 Clay Andrei Chesnokov #36 6-2 6-2 6-0 Tomas Carbonell #444 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Andrei Chesnokov #709 #9 1,399 1,972 316 235 57.4% 0 2 0 0 5 7
Tomas Carbonell #860 #40 900 1,776 193 222 46.5% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Andrei Chesnokov Tomas Carbonell
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 1986 1–3 25.0% #404 1,480 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1987 4–3 57.1% #242 1,558 0 0
19 1985 3–3 50.0% #137 1,546 0 0 1988 7–7 50.0% #209 1,573 0 0
20 1986 13–9 59.1% #36 1,733 0 0 1989 15–15 50.0% #77 1,623 0 0
21 1987 24–16 60.0% #52 1,802 0 1 1990 25–23 52.1% #76 1,708 0 0
22 1988 44–16 73.3% #14 1,884 0 2 1991 14–26 35.0% #96 1,623 0 0
23 1989 30–16 65.2% #22 1,863 0 4 1992 21–19 52.5% #65 1,658 0 1
24 1990 43–20 68.3% #12 1,861 0 6 1993 18–28 39.1% #89 1,580 0 1
25 1991 28–21 57.1% #31 1,781 0 7 1994 28–27 50.9% #62 1,639 0 1
26 1992 28–27 50.9% #30 1,726 0 7 1995 26–26 50.0% #74 1,677 0 1
27 1993 37–28 56.9% #27 1,749 0 7 1996 21–25 45.7% #75 1,585 0 2
28 1994 37–29 56.1% #32 1,773 0 7 1997 8–13 38.1% #170 1,576 0 2
29 1995 14–22 38.9% #89 1,628 0 7 1998 5–5 50.0% #167 1,619 0 2
30 1996 11–20 35.5% #85 1,585 0 7 1999 0–2 0.0% #826 1,581 0 2
31 1997 2–4 33.3% #209 1,571 0 7 — — — — — — —
32 1998 2–3 40.0% #494 1,565 0 7 — — — — — — —
33 1999 0–1 0.0% #872 1,551 0 7 — — — — — — —