H2H data updated: 2026-09-05 00:00 UTC

Andrei Chesnokov vs Tomas Smid H2H: 1-1

Andrei Chesnokov and Tomas Smid are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Tomas Smid leads 1–0 on carpet, while Andrei Chesnokov leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Andrei Chesnokov won the 1988 Toulouse quarterfinal 6-4 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Andrei Chesnokov
RUS Age 60 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main draw meetings
Tomas Smid
CZE Age 70 Right-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Andrei Chesnokov #17 6-4 6-2 Tomas Smid #81 Match data Oct 15, 1988* QF Toulouse ATP 250 Hard
Tomas Smid #56 7-6 4-6 6-4 Andrei Chesnokov #36 Match data Feb 5, 1987* R32 Philadelphia ATP 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Andrei Chesnokov #709 #9 1,399 1,971 317 237 57.2% 0 2 0 0 5 7
Tomas Smid #975 #11 28 1,994 490 317 60.7% 0 0 0 0 9 9

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Andrei Chesnokov Tomas Smid
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 1985 3–3 50.0% #137 1,547 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1986 13–9 59.1% #36 1,733 0 0 1976 5–7 41.7% #154 1,542 0 0
21 1987 24–16 60.0% #52 1,795 0 1 1977 16–18 47.1% #62 1,639 0 0
22 1988 44–17 72.1% #14 1,870 0 2 1978 36–25 59.0% #36 1,799 0 1
23 1989 30–16 65.2% #22 1,864 0 4 1979 50–25 66.7% #27 1,871 0 2
24 1990 43–20 68.3% #12 1,878 0 6 1980 43–20 68.3% #23 1,923 0 4
25 1991 28–21 57.1% #31 1,784 0 7 1981 49–28 63.6% #28 1,854 0 4
26 1992 29–28 50.9% #30 1,730 0 7 1982 62–28 68.9% #24 1,893 0 6
27 1993 37–28 56.9% #27 1,750 0 7 1983 59–30 66.3% #17 1,903 0 8
28 1994 37–29 56.1% #32 1,772 0 7 1984 46–27 63.0% #16 1,840 0 8
29 1995 14–22 38.9% #89 1,629 0 7 1985 47–27 63.5% #19 1,804 0 9
30 1996 11–20 35.5% #85 1,585 0 7 1986 28–24 53.8% #54 1,723 0 9
31 1997 2–4 33.3% #209 1,572 0 7 1987 30–26 53.6% #31 1,730 0 9
32 1998 2–3 40.0% #494 1,566 0 7 1988 17–23 42.5% #115 1,657 0 9
33 1999 0–1 0.0% #872 1,552 0 7 1989 2–9 18.2% #453 1,536 0 9

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Andrei Chesnokov Tomas Smid
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
19 1985 — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1986 5 3 8 62.5% 6 2 8 75.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 1976 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0%
21 1987 6 5 11 54.5% 16 6 22 72.7% — — — — 2 5 7 28.6% 1977 4 5 9 44.4% 10 8 18 55.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0%
22 1988 24 7 31 77.4% 10 4 14 71.4% 4 2 6 66.7% 6 4 10 60.0% 1978 4 5 9 44.4% 22 12 34 64.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 10 7 17 58.8%
23 1989 11 9 20 55.0% 17 4 21 81.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1979 6 4 10 60.0% 33 12 45 73.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 10 8 18 55.6%
24 1990 21 11 32 65.6% 21 6 27 77.8% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% 1980 15 6 21 71.4% 16 7 23 69.6% — — — — 12 7 19 63.2%
25 1991 11 7 18 61.1% 10 7 17 58.8% — — — — 7 7 14 50.0% 1981 15 7 22 68.2% 23 11 34 67.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 11 9 20 55.0%
26 1992 17 13 30 56.7% 7 7 14 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 1982 10 4 14 71.4% 24 11 35 68.6% 2 1 3 66.7% 26 12 38 68.4%
27 1993 13 10 23 56.5% 20 10 30 66.7% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 1983 10 6 16 62.5% 36 12 48 75.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 8 9 17 47.1%
28 1994 11 11 22 50.0% 19 13 32 59.4% — — — — 7 5 12 58.3% 1984 10 4 14 71.4% 15 11 26 57.7% 4 1 5 80.0% 17 11 28 60.7%
29 1995 3 8 11 27.3% 7 9 16 43.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 1985 18 9 27 66.7% 18 7 25 72.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 10 9 19 52.6%
30 1996 3 9 12 25.0% 7 7 14 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1986 7 5 12 58.3% 15 11 26 57.7% 2 1 3 66.7% 4 7 11 36.4%
31 1997 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1987 6 8 14 42.9% 18 11 29 62.1% 1 1 2 50.0% 5 6 11 45.5%
32 1998 — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — 1988 6 6 12 50.0% 11 11 22 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 5 5 0.0%
33 1999 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1989 0 1 1 0.0% 2 8 10 20.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 127 96 223 57.0% 145 80 225 64.4% 6 14 20 30.0% 39 47 86 45.3% — 111 71 182 61.0% 247 135 382 64.7% 17 15 32 53.1% 115 96 211 54.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Andrei Chesnokov Tomas Smid
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
19 1985 1547 121.7 — — — — — +51 — 55.0% +0.20 0–2 0–1 — +0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1986 1733 139.9 — — — — -84 +19 -231 57.1% +0.44 2–2 (50%) 4–2 (67%) 103.6 -0.26 1976 1542 125.7 — — — — -33 +68 — 51.6% +0.16 0–5 (0%) 2–4 (33%) 94.4 +0.89
21 1987 1796 145.6 — — — — -88 +23 — 57.6% +0.46 5–4 (56%) 6–3 (67%) 102.4 -0.88 1977 1639 136.8 — — — — -104 +44 -135 51.3% +0.20 1–7 (13%) 2–6 (25%) 92.3 +1.24
22 1988 1870 145.9 — — — — +7 +8 -313 64.4% +0.94 12–2 (86%) 9–8 (53%) 108.9 +0.32 1978 1799 150.6 — — — — -122 +63 — 54.8% +0.44 11–8 (58%) 8–7 (53%) 105.4 +0.34
23 1989 1864 147.5 — — — — -47 +110 — 61.3% +0.79 7–5 (58%) 6–5 (55%) 99.6 -1.29 1979 1871 159.1 — — — — -70 +110 — 63.8% +0.89 7–7 (50%) 12–6 (67%) 104.6 -1.69
24 1990 1878 150.0 — — — — -51 +149 — 63.6% +0.75 12–6 (67%) 17–7 (71%) 106.7 +2.31 1980 1923 155.5 — — — — +11 +3 — 65.7% +0.98 7–5 (58%) 6–2 (75%) 100.9 -2.22
25 1991 1785 146.6 -0.90 +3.53 1.055 51.0% -21 +168 — 54.8% +0.32 10–8 (56%) 3–5 (38%) 97.6 +0.62 1981 1854 157.2 — — — — +46 +62 — 60.1% +0.90 11–6 (65%) 15–9 (63%) 104.7 -1.40
26 1992 1731 142.0 -2.64 +1.87 0.945 49.0% +21 +122 -215 52.0% -0.08 9–13 (41%) 16–11 (59%) 95.7 -1.43 1982 1894 156.3 — — — — +23 +3 -326 63.8% +1.01 16–10 (62%) 14–11 (56%) 102.8 -0.62
27 1993 1751 150.6 -1.34 +3.83 1.032 50.7% -18 +164 -256 53.5% +0.25 12–8 (60%) 14–6 (70%) 110.2 -1.46 1983 1903 155.6 — — — — -53 +56 -203 61.5% +0.89 12–9 (57%) 6–10 (38%) 94.2 -2.90
28 1994 1773 144.3 -2.46 +3.28 1.020 50.4% -21 +36 — 54.1% +0.22 15–11 (58%) 15–6 (71%) 108.6 -0.96 1984 1841 154.8 — — — — +61 -25 -66 59.9% +0.58 10–7 (59%) 10–11 (48%) 97.7 -1.32
29 1995 1629 124.4 -2.64 +0.64 0.945 48.7% +12 +110 — 44.0% -0.33 4–6 (40%) 6–9 (40%) 93.7 +0.46 1985 1805 149.1 — — — — +56 +68 -70 59.1% +0.51 14–6 (70%) 13–8 (62%) 103.3 +1.83
30 1996 1586 127.1 -5.11 +1.56 0.888 47.6% -1 +99 — 41.0% -0.58 4–7 (36%) 3–6 (33%) 94.7 -0.37 1986 1724 130.9 — — — — +7 +71 +37 52.3% +0.30 10–7 (59%) 6–15 (29%) 93.3 +1.95
31 1997 1573 106.6 -2.39 -0.42 0.838 46.6% -10 — — 42.9% -0.57 1–1 0–1 — +0.22 1987 1731 138.3 — — — — -67 +83 — 53.2% +0.07 7–10 (41%) 16–9 (64%) 100.8 -0.84
32 1998 1566 109.5 -2.05 -0.66 0.859 46.8% — +108 — 36.4% -1.45 — 1–0 — +0.01 1988 1657 139.2 — — — — +9 +87 — 41.8% -0.36 7–5 (58%) 4–7 (36%) 100.6 -2.59
33 1999 1553 97.0 -0.85 +0.87 0.553 38.9% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.08 1989 1537 102.8 — — — — — +74 — 25.9% -1.52 1–2 (33%) 0–3 (0%) 95.0 +0.70
Career — 1971 149.2 -2.27 +2.59 0.984 49.7% -20 +96 -265 55.4% +0.31 93–75 (55%) 100–70 (59%) 106.2 -0.47 — 1994 155.1 — — — — -3 +56 -137 58.0% +0.58 114–94 (55%) 114–108 (51%) 99.2 -0.82

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.