H2H data updated: 2026-09-05 00:00 UTC

Andrei Chesnokov vs Tommy Ho H2H: 1-0

Andrei Chesnokov holds a 1–0 lead over Tommy Ho in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Andrei Chesnokov leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Andrei Chesnokov won the 1995 Moscow round of 32 7-5 7-6(3).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Andrei Chesnokov
RUS Age 60 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main draw meetings
Tommy Ho
USA Age 53 Left-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Andrei Chesnokov #94 7-5 7-6(3) Tommy Ho #128 Match data Nov 9, 1995* R32 Moscow ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Andrei Chesnokov #709 #9 1,399 1,971 317 237 57.2% 0 2 0 0 5 7
Tommy Ho #1,306 #85 522 1,622 36 66 35.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Andrei Chesnokov Tommy Ho
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1988 1–4 20.0% #625 1,493 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1989 0–5 0.0% #641 1,444 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1990 2–2 50.0% #182 1,490 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1991 2–4 33.3% #224 1,491 0 0
19 1985 3–3 50.0% #137 1,547 0 0 1992 4–4 50.0% #154 1,561 0 0
20 1986 13–9 59.1% #36 1,733 0 0 1993 7–14 33.3% #132 1,553 0 0
21 1987 24–16 60.0% #52 1,795 0 1 1994 2–10 16.7% #165 1,484 0 0
22 1988 44–17 72.1% #14 1,870 0 2 1995 14–16 46.7% #127 1,562 0 0
23 1989 30–16 65.2% #22 1,864 0 4 1996 1–2 33.3% #482 1,556 0 0
24 1990 43–20 68.3% #12 1,878 0 6 1997 3–4 42.9% #250 1,560 0 0
25 1991 28–21 57.1% #31 1,784 0 7 1998 0–1 0.0% #1256 1,546 0 0
26 1992 29–28 50.9% #30 1,730 0 7 — — — — — — —
27 1993 37–28 56.9% #27 1,750 0 7 — — — — — — —
28 1994 37–29 56.1% #32 1,772 0 7 — — — — — — —
29 1995 14–22 38.9% #89 1,629 0 7 — — — — — — —
30 1996 11–20 35.5% #85 1,585 0 7 — — — — — — —
31 1997 2–4 33.3% #209 1,572 0 7 — — — — — — —
32 1998 2–3 40.0% #494 1,566 0 7 — — — — — — —
33 1999 0–1 0.0% #872 1,552 0 7 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Andrei Chesnokov Tommy Ho
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
19 1985 — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1992 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1986 5 3 8 62.5% 6 2 8 75.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 1993 3 10 13 23.1% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 4 2 6 66.7%
21 1987 6 5 11 54.5% 16 6 22 72.7% — — — — 2 5 7 28.6% 1994 0 6 6 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0%
22 1988 24 7 31 77.4% 10 4 14 71.4% 4 2 6 66.7% 6 4 10 60.0% 1995 8 7 15 53.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 4 6 33.3%
23 1989 11 9 20 55.0% 17 4 21 81.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1996 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
24 1990 21 11 32 65.6% 21 6 27 77.8% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% 1997 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1991 11 7 18 61.1% 10 7 17 58.8% — — — — 7 7 14 50.0% 1998 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
26 1992 17 13 30 56.7% 7 7 14 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1993 13 10 23 56.5% 20 10 30 66.7% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1994 11 11 22 50.0% 19 13 32 59.4% — — — — 7 5 12 58.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1995 3 8 11 27.3% 7 9 16 43.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1996 3 9 12 25.0% 7 7 14 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1997 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1998 — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1999 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 127 96 223 57.0% 145 80 225 64.4% 6 14 20 30.0% 39 47 86 45.3% — 22 45 67 32.8% 0 3 3 0.0% 4 6 10 40.0% 10 12 22 45.5%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 277/316 of Andrei Chesnokov's and 77/88 of Tommy Ho's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Andrei Chesnokov Tommy Ho
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1991 4/6 3.8 4.0 60.8% 67.1% 54.3% 60.6% 59.4% 61.7% 34.4%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1992 7/8 5.9 2.7 66.3% 72.4% 50.0% 54.5% 47.7% 64.8% 38.6%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1993 18/21 3.4 3.6 61.8% 67.6% 49.4% 56.5% 32.0% 60.3% 33.5%
21 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1994 12/12 2.8 3.0 58.9% 64.4% 50.4% 47.3% 37.4% 58.7% 36.2%
22 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1995 26/30 4.2 2.4 58.6% 71.7% 50.0% 51.9% 41.7% 62.6% 38.6%
23 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1996 3/3 6.0 0.3 63.6% 68.9% 61.0% 76.2% 37.0% 66.1% 33.1%
24 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1997 6/7 5.7 2.5 56.5% 74.3% 52.5% 67.4% 68.7% 64.8% 35.7%
25 1991 42/49 2.1 2.1 62.3% 63.5% 52.4% 45.5% 53.1% 59.0% 43.2% 1998 1/1 3.0 1.0 65.5% 52.8% 47.4% 50.0% 50.0% 50.9% 25.0%
26 1992 50/57 3.0 3.3 54.7% 65.5% 47.0% 53.2% 42.8% 57.4% 40.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 1993 61/65 2.9 2.6 55.6% 66.2% 50.4% 49.9% 44.3% 59.1% 42.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
28 1994 57/66 2.9 2.7 58.8% 66.1% 47.6% 54.0% 47.5% 58.7% 42.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 1995 29/36 3.3 2.8 61.0% 65.8% 49.1% 53.9% 36.0% 59.1% 38.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 1996 27/31 2.7 2.9 56.8% 62.0% 45.7% 49.9% 44.7% 54.6% 40.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 1997 6/6 3.8 2.7 56.3% 63.0% 44.3% 62.0% 63.2% 54.8% 37.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 1998 4/5 1.3 3.8 59.0% 59.5% 40.9% 54.3% 49.3% 52.0% 41.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 1999 1/1 2.0 3.0 57.4% 51.9% 50.0% 42.9% 0.0% 51.1% 27.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 277/554 2.8 2.7 57.9% 64.9% 48.6% 51.4% 45.5% 58.1% 41.3% — 77/102 4.1 2.8 60.3% 69.3% 50.7% 55.1% 42.3% 61.8% 36.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Andrei Chesnokov Tommy Ho
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 1493 111.5 — — — — +31 — — 16.7% -1.92 1–0 0–2 — -0.44
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 1444 98.2 — — — — +20 — — 9.1% -2.27 0–1 — — +0.20
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 1490 118.0 — — — — +32 — — 33.3% -0.89 1–1 1–2 (33%) — -0.08
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 1492 106.7 -0.42 -1.22 0.898 47.8% +20 — — 40.0% -0.67 1–2 (33%) 0–1 — -0.10
19 1985 1547 121.7 — — — — — +51 — 55.0% +0.20 0–2 0–1 — +0.06 1992 1561 120.9 +0.64 +0.42 1.096 51.0% +23 — — 59.1% +0.41 0–2 4–3 (57%) — +0.42
20 1986 1733 139.9 — — — — -84 +19 -231 57.1% +0.44 2–2 (50%) 4–2 (67%) 103.6 -0.26 1993 1553 117.7 -1.61 -2.42 0.843 46.9% +25 — — 40.7% -0.78 1–6 (14%) 4–4 (50%) 95.5 +0.53
21 1987 1796 145.6 — — — — -88 +23 — 57.6% +0.46 5–4 (56%) 6–3 (67%) 102.4 -0.88 1994 1484 112.9 -1.58 -0.49 0.877 47.5% +17 — — 25.0% -1.14 1–2 (33%) 2–6 (25%) 96.7 +0.63
22 1988 1870 145.9 — — — — +7 +8 -313 64.4% +0.94 12–2 (86%) 9–8 (53%) 108.9 +0.32 1995 1562 130.5 +0.48 +1.09 1.031 50.3% +18 — +36 49.4% +0.06 3–6 (33%) 3–5 (38%) 95.0 +0.89
23 1989 1864 147.5 — — — — -47 +110 — 61.3% +0.79 7–5 (58%) 6–5 (55%) 99.6 -1.29 1996 1557 112.9 -0.28 +0.97 0.978 49.8% +16 — — 42.9% -0.14 0–1 2–1 (67%) — +0.13
24 1990 1878 150.0 — — — — -51 +149 — 63.6% +0.75 12–6 (67%) 17–7 (71%) 106.7 +2.31 1997 1561 115.7 +1.65 -1.05 1.015 50.2% +16 — — 47.4% -0.32 1–2 (33%) 2–0 — +0.34
25 1991 1785 146.6 -0.90 +3.53 1.055 51.0% -21 +168 — 54.8% +0.32 10–8 (56%) 3–5 (38%) 97.6 +0.62 1998 1546 96.1 -1.39 -2.17 0.509 39.4% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.11
26 1992 1731 142.0 -2.64 +1.87 0.945 49.0% +21 +122 -215 52.0% -0.08 9–13 (41%) 16–11 (59%) 95.7 -1.43 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1993 1751 150.6 -1.34 +3.83 1.032 50.7% -18 +164 -256 53.5% +0.25 12–8 (60%) 14–6 (70%) 110.2 -1.46 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1994 1773 144.3 -2.46 +3.28 1.020 50.4% -21 +36 — 54.1% +0.22 15–11 (58%) 15–6 (71%) 108.6 -0.96 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1995 1629 124.4 -2.64 +0.64 0.945 48.7% +12 +110 — 44.0% -0.33 4–6 (40%) 6–9 (40%) 93.7 +0.46 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1996 1586 127.1 -5.11 +1.56 0.888 47.6% -1 +99 — 41.0% -0.58 4–7 (36%) 3–6 (33%) 94.7 -0.37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1997 1573 106.6 -2.39 -0.42 0.838 46.6% -10 — — 42.9% -0.57 1–1 0–1 — +0.22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1998 1566 109.5 -2.05 -0.66 0.859 46.8% — +108 — 36.4% -1.45 — 1–0 — +0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1999 1553 97.0 -0.85 +0.87 0.553 38.9% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.08 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1971 149.2 -2.27 +2.59 0.984 49.7% -20 +96 -265 55.4% +0.31 93–75 (55%) 100–70 (59%) 106.2 -0.47 — 1622 127.2 -0.32 -0.37 0.946 48.8% +21 — +36 40.7% -0.54 9–23 (28%) 18–24 (43%) 91.9 +2.58

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.