H2H data updated: 2026-09-04 00:00 UTC

Andrei Chesnokov vs Yannick Noah H2H: 0-2

Yannick Noah holds a 2–0 lead over Andrei Chesnokov in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Yannick Noah leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Yannick Noah won the 1990 Toulouse round of 16 W/O.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Andrei Chesnokov
RUS Age 60 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
0 – 2
2 main draw meetings
Yannick Noah
FRA Age 66 Right-Handed 194 cm / 6'4"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Yannick Noah #44 (w/o) Andrei Chesnokov #12 Match data Oct 5, 1990* R16 Toulouse ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard
Yannick Noah #11 6-1 6-4 6-4 Andrei Chesnokov #20 Match data Mar 20, 1988* QF Miami Open ATP 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Andrei Chesnokov #709 #9 1,399 1,971 317 237 57.2% 0 2 0 0 5 7
Yannick Noah #1,303 #3 1,079 2,199 456 194 70.2% 1 0 0 1 21 23

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Andrei Chesnokov Yannick Noah
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 1977 0–1 0.0% #269 1,491 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1978 23–14 62.2% #49 1,708 0 2
19 1985 3–3 50.0% #137 1,547 0 0 1979 34–14 70.8% #26 1,933 0 5
20 1986 13–9 59.1% #36 1,733 0 0 1980 29–16 64.4% #18 1,890 0 5
21 1987 24–16 60.0% #52 1,795 0 1 1981 51–18 73.9% #13 1,917 0 7
22 1988 44–17 72.1% #14 1,870 0 2 1982 50–12 80.6% #10 2,086 0 11
23 1989 30–16 65.2% #22 1,864 0 4 1983 36–9 80.0% #5 2,087 1 14
24 1990 43–20 68.3% #12 1,878 0 6 1984 23–10 69.7% #9 1,997 1 14
25 1991 28–21 57.1% #31 1,784 0 7 1985 50–17 74.6% #7 1,956 1 17
26 1992 29–28 50.9% #30 1,730 0 7 1986 43–14 75.4% #4 2,012 1 19
27 1993 37–28 56.9% #27 1,750 0 7 1987 34–13 72.3% #8 1,951 1 21
28 1994 37–29 56.1% #32 1,772 0 7 1988 32–10 76.2% #12 1,948 1 22
29 1995 14–22 38.9% #89 1,629 0 7 1989 21–14 60.0% #16 1,876 1 22
30 1996 11–20 35.5% #85 1,585 0 7 1990 22–21 51.2% #40 1,708 1 23
31 1997 2–4 33.3% #209 1,572 0 7 1991 7–7 50.0% #188 1,708 1 23
32 1998 2–3 40.0% #494 1,566 0 7 — — — — — — —
33 1999 0–1 0.0% #872 1,552 0 7 — — — — — — —
35 — — — — — — — 1995 1–3 25.0% #552 1,686 1 23
36 — — — — — — — 1996 0–1 0.0% #1300 1,672 1 23

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Andrei Chesnokov Yannick Noah
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1977 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1978 2 3 5 40.0% 18 7 25 72.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
19 1985 — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1979 13 5 18 72.2% 16 4 20 80.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
20 1986 5 3 8 62.5% 6 2 8 75.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 1980 11 5 16 68.8% 14 5 19 73.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 3 4 7 42.9%
21 1987 6 5 11 54.5% 16 6 22 72.7% — — — — 2 5 7 28.6% 1981 10 6 16 62.5% 22 6 28 78.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 18 4 22 81.8%
22 1988 24 7 31 77.4% 10 4 14 71.4% 4 2 6 66.7% 6 4 10 60.0% 1982 19 1 20 95.0% 29 7 36 80.6% — — — — 2 4 6 33.3%
23 1989 11 9 20 55.0% 17 4 21 81.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1983 9 4 13 69.2% 23 2 25 92.0% — — — — 4 3 7 57.1%
24 1990 21 11 32 65.6% 21 6 27 77.8% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% 1984 9 3 12 75.0% 11 4 15 73.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
25 1991 11 7 18 61.1% 10 7 17 58.8% — — — — 7 7 14 50.0% 1985 21 7 28 75.0% 20 4 24 83.3% 2 1 3 66.7% 7 5 12 58.3%
26 1992 17 13 30 56.7% 7 7 14 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 1986 15 5 20 75.0% 17 3 20 85.0% — — — — 11 6 17 64.7%
27 1993 13 10 23 56.5% 20 10 30 66.7% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 1987 13 2 15 86.7% 9 5 14 64.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 8 3 11 72.7%
28 1994 11 11 22 50.0% 19 13 32 59.4% — — — — 7 5 12 58.3% 1988 9 3 12 75.0% 14 5 19 73.7% — — — — 9 2 11 81.8%
29 1995 3 8 11 27.3% 7 9 16 43.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 1989 16 8 24 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 5 4 9 55.6%
30 1996 3 9 12 25.0% 7 7 14 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1990 16 7 23 69.6% 3 6 9 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 6 9 33.3%
31 1997 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1991 0 1 1 0.0% 6 4 10 60.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3%
32 1998 — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1999 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 127 96 223 57.0% 145 80 225 64.4% 6 14 20 30.0% 39 47 86 45.3% — 164 62 226 72.6% 202 66 268 75.4% 11 16 27 40.7% 79 50 129 61.2%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 277/316 of Andrei Chesnokov's and 18/19 of Yannick Noah's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Andrei Chesnokov Yannick Noah
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
25 1991 42/49 2.1 2.1 62.3% 63.5% 52.4% 45.5% 53.1% 59.0% 43.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
26 1992 50/57 3.0 3.3 54.7% 65.5% 47.0% 53.2% 42.8% 57.4% 40.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 1993 61/65 2.9 2.6 55.6% 66.2% 50.4% 49.9% 44.3% 59.1% 42.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
28 1994 57/66 2.9 2.7 58.8% 66.1% 47.6% 54.0% 47.5% 58.7% 42.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 1995 29/36 3.3 2.8 61.0% 65.8% 49.1% 53.9% 36.0% 59.1% 38.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 1996 27/31 2.7 2.9 56.8% 62.0% 45.7% 49.9% 44.7% 54.6% 40.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 1997 6/6 3.8 2.7 56.3% 63.0% 44.3% 62.0% 63.2% 54.8% 37.9% 1991 13/14 4.5 3.5 55.5% 68.0% 44.8% 62.6% 47.2% 57.6% 36.6%
32 1998 4/5 1.3 3.8 59.0% 59.5% 40.9% 54.3% 49.3% 52.0% 41.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 1999 1/1 2.0 3.0 57.4% 51.9% 50.0% 42.9% 0.0% 51.1% 27.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1995 4/4 4.0 1.8 55.4% 77.9% 47.6% 45.5% 20.0% 64.1% 29.2%
36 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1996 1/1 7.0 2.0 60.5% 69.2% 50.0% 50.0% 100.0% 61.6% 19.4%
Career — 277/554 2.8 2.7 57.9% 64.9% 48.6% 51.4% 45.5% 58.1% 41.3% — 18/650 4.6 3.1 55.8% 70.2% 45.7% 58.1% 44.1% 59.2% 34.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Andrei Chesnokov Yannick Noah
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1977 1491 103.3 — — — — — — — 40.0% -2.00 0–1 2–0 — -0.08
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1978 1709 137.9 — — — — -111 +56 -173 57.7% +0.42 7–5 (58%) 10–6 (63%) — +3.56
19 1985 1547 121.7 — — — — — +51 — 55.0% +0.20 0–2 0–1 — +0.06 1979 1933 150.7 — — — — -105 +27 -371 65.1% +1.08 9–4 (69%) 10–9 (53%) — +0.67
20 1986 1733 139.9 — — — — -84 +19 -231 57.1% +0.44 2–2 (50%) 4–2 (67%) — -0.26 1980 1890 153.0 — — — — +5 +91 -340 59.5% +0.98 9–6 (60%) 6–8 (43%) — -3.05
21 1987 1796 145.6 — — — — -88 +23 — 57.6% +0.46 5–4 (56%) 6–3 (67%) — -0.88 1981 1917 156.5 — — — — +62 +116 -384 64.4% +1.04 17–4 (81%) 9–12 (43%) — -1.67
22 1988 1870 145.9 — — — — +7 +8 -313 64.4% +0.94 12–2 (86%) 9–8 (53%) — +0.32 1982 2086 164.7 — — — — -20 +30 — 74.0% +1.55 12–5 (71%) 9–6 (60%) — -3.56
23 1989 1864 147.5 — — — — -47 +110 — 61.3% +0.79 7–5 (58%) 6–5 (55%) — -1.29 1983 2087 162.3 — — — — -135 +184 — 74.8% +1.72 7–6 (54%) 8–4 (67%) — -1.85
24 1990 1878 150.0 — — — — -51 +149 — 63.6% +0.75 12–6 (67%) 17–7 (71%) — +2.31 1984 1998 159.6 — — — — -11 +206 — 65.9% +0.83 8–5 (62%) 9–3 (75%) — -2.14
25 1991 1785 146.6 -0.90 +3.53 1.055 51.0% -21 +168 — 54.8% +0.32 10–8 (56%) 3–5 (38%) — +0.62 1985 1957 156.2 — — — — -10 +205 -368 68.4% +1.11 12–6 (67%) 18–12 (60%) — -0.87
26 1992 1731 142.0 -2.64 +1.87 0.945 49.0% +21 +122 -215 52.0% -0.08 9–13 (41%) 16–11 (59%) — -1.43 1986 2013 163.9 — — — — -41 +208 — 67.8% +1.19 13–5 (72%) 12–17 (41%) — -2.21
27 1993 1751 150.6 -1.34 +3.83 1.032 50.7% -18 +164 -256 53.5% +0.25 12–8 (60%) 14–6 (70%) — -1.46 1987 1951 147.7 — — — — +93 +140 -296 65.0% +1.00 11–4 (73%) 8–9 (47%) — +1.55
28 1994 1773 144.3 -2.46 +3.28 1.020 50.4% -21 +36 — 54.1% +0.22 15–11 (58%) 15–6 (71%) — -0.96 1988 1949 153.8 — — — — +75 +116 — 67.2% +1.03 12–4 (75%) 15–11 (58%) — -0.74
29 1995 1629 124.4 -2.64 +0.64 0.945 48.7% +12 +110 — 44.0% -0.33 4–6 (40%) 6–9 (40%) — +0.46 1989 1877 147.3 — — — — +46 — — 56.2% +0.40 10–4 (71%) 10–12 (45%) — -0.89
30 1996 1586 127.1 -5.11 +1.56 0.888 47.6% -1 +99 — 41.0% -0.58 4–7 (36%) 3–6 (33%) — -0.37 1990 1708 139.1 — — — — +109 +162 — 49.1% -0.16 8–6 (57%) 10–9 (53%) — -1.00
31 1997 1573 106.6 -2.39 -0.42 0.838 46.6% -10 — — 42.9% -0.57 1–1 0–1 — +0.22 1991 1709 127.3 -0.35 -2.54 0.863 47.8% +60 +151 — 48.5% -0.48 3–2 (60%) 2–0 — -0.03
32 1998 1566 109.5 -2.05 -0.66 0.859 46.8% — +108 — 36.4% -1.45 — 1–0 — +0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1999 1553 97.0 -0.85 +0.87 0.553 38.9% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.08 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1686 117.0 -0.18 -0.05 0.814 46.1% +61 — — 25.0% -1.38 — 1–1 — -0.54
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1672 104.2 -2.25 +2.64 0.506 43.1% — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 — — -0.10
Career — 1971 149.2 -2.27 +2.59 0.984 49.7% -20 +96 -265 55.4% +0.31 93–75 (55%) 100–70 (59%) 106.2 -0.47 — 2199 161.2 -0.42 -1.70 0.835 47.2% +9 +121 -314 64.2% +0.93 138–68 (67%) 139–119 (54%) 101.7 -2.00

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.