H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Andrei Chesnokov vs Yevgeny Kafelnikov H2H: 1-1
Andrei Chesnokov and Yevgeny Kafelnikov are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on carpet. Most recently, Yevgeny Kafelnikov won the 1996 Moscow third round 4-6 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 60
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
RUS
Age 52
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 7, 1996* | Moscow | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Yevgeny Kafelnikov | 4-6 6-4 6-4 | Andrei Chesnokov | Match data |
| Oct 22, 1994* | Lyon | ATP 250 | QF | Carpet | Andrei Chesnokov | 5-7 7-6(0) 6-1 | Yevgeny Kafelnikov | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andrei Chesnokov | #709 | #9 | 1,399 | 1,972 | 316 | 235 | 57.4% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 7 |
| Yevgeny Kafelnikov | #636 | #1 | 3,917 | 2,071 | 568 | 281 | 66.9% | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 23 | 25 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Andrei Chesnokov | Yevgeny Kafelnikov | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #275 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1985 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #137 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #102 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1986 | 13–9 | 59.1% | #36 | 1,733 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 60–27 | 69.0% | #11 | 1,888 | 0 | 3 |
| 21 | 1987 | 24–16 | 60.0% | #52 | 1,802 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 69–27 | 71.9% | #6 | 1,875 | 0 | 7 |
| 22 | 1988 | 44–16 | 73.3% | #14 | 1,884 | 0 | 2 | 1996 | 73–25 | 74.5% | #3 | 1,972 | 1 | 11 |
| 23 | 1989 | 30–16 | 65.2% | #22 | 1,863 | 0 | 4 | 1997 | 54–26 | 67.5% | #5 | 1,955 | 1 | 14 |
| 24 | 1990 | 43–20 | 68.3% | #12 | 1,861 | 0 | 6 | 1998 | 55–29 | 65.5% | #11 | 1,950 | 1 | 17 |
| 25 | 1991 | 28–21 | 57.1% | #31 | 1,781 | 0 | 7 | 1999 | 59–29 | 67.0% | #2 | 1,922 | 2 | 20 |
| 26 | 1992 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #30 | 1,726 | 0 | 7 | 2000 | 58–31 | 65.2% | #5 | 1,859 | 2 | 21 |
| 27 | 1993 | 37–28 | 56.9% | #27 | 1,749 | 0 | 7 | 2001 | 64–26 | 71.1% | #4 | 1,979 | 2 | 23 |
| 28 | 1994 | 37–29 | 56.1% | #32 | 1,773 | 0 | 7 | 2002 | 36–23 | 61.0% | #27 | 1,809 | 2 | 25 |
| 29 | 1995 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #89 | 1,628 | 0 | 7 | 2003 | 29–24 | 54.7% | #41 | 1,708 | 2 | 25 |
| 30 | 1996 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #85 | 1,585 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1997 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #209 | 1,571 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1998 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #494 | 1,565 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1999 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #872 | 1,551 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |