H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Andrei Medvedev vs Kevin Curren H2H: 1-0
Andrei Medvedev holds a 1–0 lead over Kevin Curren in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Andrei Medvedev leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Andrei Medvedev won the 1992 Roland Garros second round 6-4 4-6 6-1 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
UKR
Age 51
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 68
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 29, 1992* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R64 | Clay | Andrei Medvedev | 6-4 4-6 6-1 6-3 | Kevin Curren | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andrei Medvedev | #679 | #4 | 2,755 | 2,022 | 303 | 211 | 58.9% | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 11 |
| Kevin Curren | #1,179 | #5 | 684 | 2,060 | 339 | 238 | 58.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Andrei Medvedev | Kevin Curren | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1007 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1991 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #227 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1992 | 32–12 | 72.7% | #24 | 1,836 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1993 | 58–24 | 70.7% | #6 | 1,943 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1994 | 34–18 | 65.4% | #15 | 1,816 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1995 | 39–26 | 60.0% | #16 | 1,769 | 0 | 9 | 1978 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #91 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1996 | 32–22 | 59.3% | #35 | 1,775 | 0 | 10 | 1979 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #197 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1997 | 30–23 | 56.6% | #27 | 1,776 | 0 | 11 | 1980 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #55 | 1,770 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1998 | 22–22 | 50.0% | #62 | 1,708 | 0 | 11 | 1981 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #50 | 1,770 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1999 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #30 | 1,722 | 0 | 11 | 1982 | 33–17 | 66.0% | #17 | 1,941 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2000 | 20–17 | 54.1% | #58 | 1,774 | 0 | 11 | 1983 | 32–20 | 61.5% | #9 | 1,925 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2001 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #156 | 1,627 | 0 | 11 | 1984 | 32–17 | 65.3% | #15 | 1,932 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 25–13 | 65.8% | #10 | 1,895 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 35–17 | 67.3% | #18 | 1,886 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 21–17 | 55.3% | #37 | 1,807 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 31–15 | 67.4% | #23 | 1,822 | 0 | 4 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 33–18 | 64.7% | #20 | 1,793 | 0 | 5 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #71 | 1,791 | 0 | 5 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #58 | 1,700 | 0 | 5 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #147 | 1,653 | 0 | 5 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1178 | 1,631 | 0 | 5 |