H2H data updated: 2026-07-20 02:15 UTC
Andrei Medvedev vs Nicolas Escude H2H: 1-1
Andrei Medvedev and Nicolas Escude are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Nicolas Escude leads 1–0 on carpet, while Andrei Medvedev leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Nicolas Escude won the 1999 Moscow quarterfinal 2-6 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
UKR
Age 51
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 50
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 13, 1999* | Moscow | ATP 250 | QF | Carpet | Nicolas Escude | 2-6 6-3 6-2 | Andrei Medvedev | Match data |
| Jun 1, 1997* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R32 | Clay | Andrei Medvedev | 7-6(2) 6-4 6-3 | Nicolas Escude | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andrei Medvedev | #679 | #4 | 2,755 | 2,022 | 303 | 211 | 58.9% | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 11 |
| Nicolas Escude | #1,071 | #17 | 1,357 | 1,909 | 157 | 124 | 55.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Andrei Medvedev | Nicolas Escude | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1007 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1991 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #227 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1992 | 32–12 | 72.7% | #24 | 1,836 | 0 | 3 | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #670 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1993 | 58–24 | 70.7% | #6 | 1,943 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1994 | 34–18 | 65.4% | #15 | 1,816 | 0 | 8 | 1995 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #189 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1995 | 39–26 | 60.0% | #16 | 1,769 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1996 | 32–22 | 59.3% | #35 | 1,775 | 0 | 10 | 1997 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #93 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1997 | 30–23 | 56.6% | #27 | 1,776 | 0 | 11 | 1998 | 22–22 | 50.0% | #37 | 1,699 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1998 | 22–22 | 50.0% | #62 | 1,708 | 0 | 11 | 1999 | 19–15 | 55.9% | #37 | 1,820 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1999 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #30 | 1,722 | 0 | 11 | 2000 | 26–22 | 54.2% | #48 | 1,717 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2000 | 20–17 | 54.1% | #58 | 1,774 | 0 | 11 | 2001 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #27 | 1,724 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2001 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #156 | 1,627 | 0 | 11 | 2002 | 29–15 | 65.9% | #34 | 1,842 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #114 | 1,790 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 15–8 | 65.2% | #64 | 1,829 | 0 | 4 |