H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Andrei Medvedev vs Paolo Cane H2H: 0-1
Paolo Cane holds a 1–0 lead over Andrei Medvedev in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Paolo Cane leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Paolo Cane won the 1992 Palermo third round 6-7(4) 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
UKR
Age 51
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
ITA
Age 61
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 1, 1992* | Palermo | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Paolo Cane | 6-7(4) 6-3 6-3 | Andrei Medvedev | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andrei Medvedev | #679 | #4 | 2,755 | 2,022 | 303 | 211 | 58.9% | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 11 |
| Paolo Cane | #1,381 | #26 | 565 | 1,835 | 121 | 122 | 49.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Andrei Medvedev | Paolo Cane | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1007 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1991 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #227 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1992 | 32–12 | 72.7% | #24 | 1,836 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1993 | 58–24 | 70.7% | #6 | 1,943 | 0 | 6 | 1983 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1994 | 34–18 | 65.4% | #15 | 1,816 | 0 | 8 | 1984 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #555 | 1,457 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1995 | 39–26 | 60.0% | #16 | 1,769 | 0 | 9 | 1985 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #199 | 1,450 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1996 | 32–22 | 59.3% | #35 | 1,775 | 0 | 10 | 1986 | 23–14 | 62.2% | #44 | 1,667 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1997 | 30–23 | 56.6% | #27 | 1,776 | 0 | 11 | 1987 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #51 | 1,707 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1998 | 22–22 | 50.0% | #62 | 1,708 | 0 | 11 | 1988 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #81 | 1,652 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1999 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #30 | 1,722 | 0 | 11 | 1989 | 24–14 | 63.2% | #33 | 1,741 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2000 | 20–17 | 54.1% | #58 | 1,774 | 0 | 11 | 1990 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #109 | 1,682 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2001 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #156 | 1,627 | 0 | 11 | 1991 | 8–6 | 57.1% | #122 | 1,684 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #163 | 1,654 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #177 | 1,596 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #145 | 1,598 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #635 | 1,581 | 0 | 3 |