H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Andrei Medvedev vs Todd Woodbridge H2H: 3-0
Andrei Medvedev holds a 3–0 lead over Todd Woodbridge in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Andrei Medvedev leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Andrei Medvedev won the 1995 Indianapolis fourth round 6-4 7-6(2).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
UKR
Age 51
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
3
–
0
3 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 55
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 14, 1995 | Indianapolis | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Andrei Medvedev | 6-4 7-6(2) | Todd Woodbridge | Match data |
| May 31, 1992* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R32 | Clay | Andrei Medvedev | 7-6(5) 6-2 6-1 | Todd Woodbridge | Match data |
| Nov 7, 1991* | Moscow | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Andrei Medvedev | 7-5 6-2 | Todd Woodbridge | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andrei Medvedev | #679 | #4 | 2,755 | 2,022 | 303 | 211 | 58.9% | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 11 |
| Todd Woodbridge | #1,151 | #19 | 1,575 | 1,857 | 237 | 229 | 50.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Andrei Medvedev | Todd Woodbridge | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1007 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1991 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #227 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1992 | 32–12 | 72.7% | #24 | 1,836 | 0 | 3 | 1988 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #213 | 1,453 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1993 | 58–24 | 70.7% | #6 | 1,943 | 0 | 6 | 1989 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #131 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1994 | 34–18 | 65.4% | #15 | 1,816 | 0 | 8 | 1990 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #50 | 1,704 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1995 | 39–26 | 60.0% | #16 | 1,769 | 0 | 9 | 1991 | 23–25 | 47.9% | #77 | 1,702 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1996 | 32–22 | 59.3% | #35 | 1,775 | 0 | 10 | 1992 | 25–22 | 53.2% | #54 | 1,684 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1997 | 30–23 | 56.6% | #27 | 1,776 | 0 | 11 | 1993 | 19–20 | 48.7% | #109 | 1,664 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1998 | 22–22 | 50.0% | #62 | 1,708 | 0 | 11 | 1994 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #90 | 1,661 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1999 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #30 | 1,722 | 0 | 11 | 1995 | 32–22 | 59.3% | #33 | 1,810 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2000 | 20–17 | 54.1% | #58 | 1,774 | 0 | 11 | 1996 | 32–23 | 58.2% | #36 | 1,744 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2001 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #156 | 1,627 | 0 | 11 | 1997 | 31–20 | 60.8% | #26 | 1,796 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #65 | 1,714 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 8–16 | 33.3% | #197 | 1,601 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #187 | 1,588 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #207 | 1,596 | 0 | 2 |