H2H data updated: 2026-07-20 14:15 UTC
Andrei Olhovskiy vs Claudio Pistolesi H2H: 1-1
Andrei Olhovskiy and Claudio Pistolesi are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Claudio Pistolesi leads 1–0 on clay, while Andrei Olhovskiy leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Andrei Olhovskiy won the 1993 Doha third round 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 60
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
ITA
Age 58
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 7, 1993* | Doha | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Andrei Olhovskiy | 6-3 6-2 | Claudio Pistolesi | Match data |
| Apr 30, 1992* | Atlanta | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Claudio Pistolesi | 6-4 6-4 | Andrei Olhovskiy | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andrei Olhovskiy | #1,310 | #49 | 690 | 1,750 | 113 | 162 | 41.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Claudio Pistolesi | #1,367 | #71 | 436 | 1,666 | 75 | 109 | 40.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Andrei Olhovskiy | Claudio Pistolesi | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #211 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #179 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #97 | 1,599 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #112 | 1,587 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1987 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #232 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 12–11 | 52.2% | #95 | 1,632 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1988 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #86 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 8–18 | 30.8% | #114 | 1,561 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1989 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #302 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #116 | 1,531 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1990 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #148 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #124 | 1,560 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1991 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #136 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #183 | 1,584 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1992 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #80 | 1,639 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1993 | 26–29 | 47.3% | #65 | 1,664 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1994 | 23–27 | 46.0% | #97 | 1,672 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1995 | 12–21 | 36.4% | #118 | 1,586 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1996 | 18–18 | 50.0% | #90 | 1,675 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1997 | 0–14 | 0.0% | #442 | 1,480 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1256 | 1,470 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |