H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Andrei Olhovskiy vs Mark Petchey H2H: 1-0
Andrei Olhovskiy holds a 1–0 lead over Mark Petchey in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Andrei Olhovskiy leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Andrei Olhovskiy won the 1994 Kuala Lumpur third round 6-7(5) 7-5 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 60
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
GBR
Age 55
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 29, 1994* | Kuala Lumpur | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Andrei Olhovskiy | 6-7(5) 7-5 6-3 | Mark Petchey | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andrei Olhovskiy | #1,310 | #49 | 690 | 1,750 | 113 | 162 | 41.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Mark Petchey | #1,313 | #80 | 552 | 1,597 | 34 | 64 | 34.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Andrei Olhovskiy | Mark Petchey | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #954 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #382 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #307 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #240 | 1,450 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #255 | 1,461 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1987 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #232 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #245 | 1,472 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1988 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #86 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #121 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1989 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #302 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 15–22 | 40.5% | #120 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1990 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #148 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #149 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1991 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #136 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #212 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1992 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #80 | 1,639 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #159 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1993 | 26–29 | 47.3% | #65 | 1,664 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #587 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1994 | 23–27 | 46.0% | #97 | 1,672 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1995 | 12–21 | 36.4% | #118 | 1,586 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1996 | 18–18 | 50.0% | #90 | 1,675 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1997 | 0–14 | 0.0% | #442 | 1,480 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1256 | 1,470 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |