H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Andrei Olhovskiy vs Rick Leach H2H: 0-1
Rick Leach holds a 1–0 lead over Andrei Olhovskiy in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Rick Leach leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Rick Leach won the 1988 Australian Open first round 6-3 6-2 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 60
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 61
Left-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 13, 1988* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Rick Leach | 6-3 6-2 6-4 | Andrei Olhovskiy | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andrei Olhovskiy | #1,310 | #49 | 690 | 1,750 | 113 | 162 | 41.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Rick Leach | #629 | #110 | 127 | 1,580 | 21 | 57 | 26.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Andrei Olhovskiy | Rick Leach | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #369 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1987 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #232 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #201 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1988 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #86 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #148 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1989 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #302 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #258 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1990 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #148 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #195 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1991 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #136 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #279 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1992 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #80 | 1,639 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 0–7 | 0.0% | #402 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1993 | 26–29 | 47.3% | #65 | 1,664 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #424 | 1,463 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1994 | 23–27 | 46.0% | #97 | 1,672 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #639 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1995 | 12–21 | 36.4% | #118 | 1,586 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #537 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 1996 | 18–18 | 50.0% | #90 | 1,675 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1997 | 0–14 | 0.0% | #442 | 1,480 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1256 | 1,470 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |