H2H data updated: 2026-07-14 14:15 UTC
A. Olhovskiy vs T. Ho H2H: 0-1
T. Ho holds a 1–0 lead over A. Olhovskiy in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, T. Ho leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, T. Ho won the 1995 Miami Masters first round 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 60
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 53
Left-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 14, 1995* | Miami Masters | Masters 1000 | R128 | Hard | T. Ho | 6-2 6-3 | A. Olhovskiy | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A. Olhovskiy | #1,310 | #49 | 690 | 1,750 | 113 | 162 | 41.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| T. Ho | #1,306 | #85 | 522 | 1,622 | 36 | 66 | 35.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | A. Olhovskiy | T. Ho | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #625 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #641 | 1,444 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #182 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #224 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #154 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #132 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1987 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #232 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 2–10 | 16.7% | #165 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1988 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #86 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #127 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1989 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #302 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #482 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1990 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #148 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #250 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1991 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #136 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1256 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1992 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #80 | 1,639 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1993 | 26–29 | 47.3% | #65 | 1,664 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1994 | 23–27 | 46.0% | #97 | 1,672 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1995 | 12–21 | 36.4% | #118 | 1,586 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1996 | 18–18 | 50.0% | #90 | 1,675 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1997 | 0–14 | 0.0% | #442 | 1,480 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1256 | 1,470 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |