H2H data updated: 2026-07-20 02:15 UTC
Andrei Olhovskiy vs Yannick Noah H2H: 0-1
Yannick Noah holds a 1–0 lead over Andrei Olhovskiy in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Yannick Noah leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Yannick Noah won the 1989 Milan third round 6-3 6-7 7-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 60
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 66
Right-Handed
194 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 16, 1989* | Milan | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Yannick Noah | 6-3 6-7 7-6 | Andrei Olhovskiy | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andrei Olhovskiy | #1,310 | #49 | 690 | 1,750 | 113 | 162 | 41.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Yannick Noah | #1,303 | #3 | 1,079 | 2,196 | 456 | 194 | 70.2% | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 21 | 23 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Andrei Olhovskiy | Yannick Noah | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #305 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 23–14 | 62.2% | #49 | 1,708 | 0 | 2 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 34–14 | 70.8% | #26 | 1,931 | 0 | 5 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 29–16 | 64.4% | #18 | 1,887 | 0 | 5 |
| 21 | 1987 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #232 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 51–18 | 73.9% | #13 | 1,915 | 0 | 7 |
| 22 | 1988 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #86 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 50–12 | 80.6% | #10 | 2,085 | 0 | 11 |
| 23 | 1989 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #302 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 36–9 | 80.0% | #5 | 2,085 | 1 | 14 |
| 24 | 1990 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #148 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 23–10 | 69.7% | #9 | 1,996 | 1 | 14 |
| 25 | 1991 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #136 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 50–17 | 74.6% | #7 | 1,954 | 1 | 17 |
| 26 | 1992 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #80 | 1,639 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 43–14 | 75.4% | #4 | 1,994 | 1 | 19 |
| 27 | 1993 | 26–29 | 47.3% | #65 | 1,664 | 0 | 1 | 1987 | 34–13 | 72.3% | #8 | 1,921 | 1 | 21 |
| 28 | 1994 | 23–27 | 46.0% | #97 | 1,672 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 32–10 | 76.2% | #12 | 1,940 | 1 | 22 |
| 29 | 1995 | 12–21 | 36.4% | #118 | 1,586 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 21–14 | 60.0% | #16 | 1,875 | 1 | 22 |
| 30 | 1996 | 18–18 | 50.0% | #90 | 1,675 | 0 | 2 | 1990 | 22–21 | 51.2% | #40 | 1,724 | 1 | 23 |
| 31 | 1997 | 0–14 | 0.0% | #442 | 1,480 | 0 | 2 | 1991 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #188 | 1,716 | 1 | 23 |
| 32 | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1256 | 1,470 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #552 | 1,692 | 1 | 23 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1300 | 1,678 | 1 | 23 |