H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Andrej Martin vs Daniel Munoz de la Nava H2H: 1-0
Andrej Martin holds a 1–0 lead over Daniel Munoz de la Nava in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Andrej Martin leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Andrej Martin won the 2016 Roland Garros first round 6-2 6-3 4-6 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Slovakia
Age 36
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 44
Left-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 24, 2016* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Andrej Martin | 6-2 6-3 4-6 6-4 | Daniel Munoz de la Nava | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andrej Martin | #392 | #93 | 768 | 1,688 | 21 | 31 | 40.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Daniel Munoz de la Nava | #1,384 | #68 | 732 | 1,761 | 9 | 28 | 24.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Andrej Martin | Daniel Munoz de la Nava | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #177 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #128 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2014 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #179 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2016 | 7–3 | 70.0% | #137 | 1,679 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #179 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2017 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #160 | 1,596 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #216 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2018 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #183 | 1,580 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #147 | 1,622 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2019 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #107 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #140 | 1,581 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2020 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #101 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #171 | 1,649 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2021 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #116 | 1,597 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #194 | 1,700 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2022 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #444 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #206 | 1,676 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 3–13 | 18.8% | #351 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |