H2H data updated: 2026-09-05 00:00 UTC

Andres Gomez vs Balazs Taroczy H2H: 2-1

Andres Gomez holds a 2–1 lead over Balazs Taroczy in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Andres Gomez leads 2–1 on clay. Most recently, Andres Gomez won the 1984 Indianapolis final 6-0 7-6.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Andres Gomez
ECU Age 66 Left-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main draw meetings
Balazs Taroczy
HUN Age 72 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Andres Gomez #5 6-0 7-6 Balazs Taroczy #83 Match data Aug 12, 1984* F Indianapolis ATP 250 Clay
Balazs Taroczy #23 6-3 4-6 6-4 Andres Gomez #17 Match data Jul 30, 1982* R16 North Conway ATP 250 Clay
Andres Gomez #53 6-4 6-2 Balazs Taroczy #34 Match data May 22, 1980* R32 Italian Open ATP 500 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Andres Gomez #1,171 #4 2,005 2,094 502 261 65.8% 1 0 0 3 17 21
Balazs Taroczy #732 #12 0 2,002 381 229 62.5% 0 0 0 0 13 13

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Andres Gomez Balazs Taroczy
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 1972 4–3 57.1% — 1,564 0 0
19 1979 11–8 57.9% #61 1,639 0 0 1973 3–5 37.5% #193 1,554 0 0
20 1980 36–23 61.0% #42 1,802 0 0 1974 21–12 63.6% #38 1,771 0 1
21 1981 36–21 63.2% #37 1,901 0 1 1975 17–16 51.5% #69 1,822 0 1
22 1982 51–25 67.1% #15 1,887 0 3 1976 37–20 64.9% #31 1,849 0 2
23 1983 43–20 68.3% #14 1,960 0 4 1977 38–23 62.3% #31 1,852 0 2
24 1984 60–13 82.2% #5 2,074 0 9 1978 44–18 71.0% #20 1,908 0 4
25 1985 26–14 65.0% #15 1,971 0 10 1979 41–22 65.1% #42 1,814 0 6
26 1986 57–20 74.0% #10 1,898 0 14 1980 46–16 74.2% #22 1,930 0 9
27 1987 46–18 71.9% #11 1,913 0 15 1981 45–17 72.6% #15 1,939 0 11
28 1988 34–18 65.4% #24 1,808 0 15 1982 43–24 64.2% #27 1,864 0 13
29 1989 32–17 65.3% #17 1,869 0 17 1983 13–14 48.1% #52 1,783 0 13
30 1990 38–27 58.5% #6 1,719 1 20 1984 18–20 47.4% #43 1,751 0 13
31 1991 20–19 51.3% #70 1,720 1 21 1985 9–17 34.6% #157 1,645 0 13
32 1992 10–12 45.5% #179 1,675 1 21 1986 2–2 50.0% #382 1,642 0 13
33 1993 2–6 25.0% #402 1,606 1 21 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Andres Gomez Balazs Taroczy
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1972 0 1 1 0.0% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — —
19 1979 1 1 2 50.0% 10 7 17 58.8% — — — — — — — — 1973 1 1 2 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
20 1980 2 2 4 50.0% 30 17 47 63.8% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1974 3 2 5 60.0% 10 5 15 66.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 6 3 9 66.7%
21 1981 4 3 7 57.1% 32 16 48 66.7% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 1975 1 1 2 50.0% 13 8 21 61.9% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 6 8 25.0%
22 1982 3 2 5 60.0% 38 16 54 70.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 1976 4 2 6 66.7% 29 14 43 67.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1%
23 1983 16 6 22 72.7% 21 10 31 67.7% — — — — 6 4 10 60.0% 1977 3 4 7 42.9% 29 16 45 64.4% — — — — 6 3 9 66.7%
24 1984 11 3 14 78.6% 35 5 40 87.5% 4 1 5 80.0% 10 4 14 71.4% 1978 7 3 10 70.0% 33 10 43 76.7% — — — — 4 5 9 44.4%
25 1985 11 3 14 78.6% 8 6 14 57.1% — — — — 7 5 12 58.3% 1979 4 3 7 57.1% 32 13 45 71.1% 4 3 7 57.1% 1 3 4 25.0%
26 1986 18 5 23 78.3% 34 9 43 79.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 1980 5 2 7 71.4% 37 9 46 80.4% 3 1 4 75.0% 1 4 5 20.0%
27 1987 15 6 21 71.4% 23 8 31 74.2% 3 1 4 75.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 1981 0 1 1 0.0% 40 12 52 76.9% 2 1 3 66.7% 3 3 6 50.0%
28 1988 17 9 26 65.4% 15 6 21 71.4% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% 1982 2 1 3 66.7% 31 15 46 67.4% — — — — 10 8 18 55.6%
29 1989 12 7 19 63.2% 18 8 26 69.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1983 — — — — 11 10 21 52.4% — — — — 2 4 6 33.3%
30 1990 10 10 20 50.0% 24 6 30 80.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 10 14 28.6% 1984 6 9 15 40.0% 9 8 17 52.9% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
31 1991 8 10 18 44.4% 6 8 14 42.9% — — — — 6 1 7 85.7% 1985 2 5 7 28.6% 5 9 14 35.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
32 1992 2 3 5 40.0% 8 9 17 47.1% — — — — — — — — 1986 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
33 1993 0 2 2 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 130 72 202 64.4% 304 135 439 69.2% 10 8 18 55.6% 58 46 104 55.8% — 38 35 73 52.1% 286 134 420 68.1% 14 13 27 51.9% 43 47 90 47.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Andres Gomez Balazs Taroczy
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1972 1565 121.5 — — — — — +57 — 52.6% +0.16 — 0–1 — +0.47
19 1979 1640 133.9 — — — — — +23 — 53.3% +0.13 5–1 (83%) 6–1 (86%) 109.8 +0.20 1973 1554 107.9 — — — — — +43 -20 38.9% -0.61 1–1 1–2 (33%) — +0.06
20 1980 1803 150.2 — — — — -218 +37 -239 56.6% +0.51 9–5 (64%) 7–5 (58%) 105.2 -1.09 1974 1771 134.2 — — — — -88 +24 -193 59.8% +0.47 6–6 (50%) 7–4 (64%) 104.8 +2.47
21 1981 1902 159.2 — — — — -233 +53 — 61.4% +0.73 11–11 (50%) 14–9 (61%) 104.5 -2.54 1975 1822 144.6 — — — — -131 +46 — 52.8% -0.04 2–3 (40%) 6–2 (75%) 103.7 -2.56
22 1982 1887 151.8 — — — — -96 +44 — 60.2% +0.59 18–10 (64%) 12–9 (57%) 104.8 -1.90 1976 1849 144.3 — — — — -88 +40 — 59.9% +0.80 12–6 (67%) 5–7 (42%) 102.3 +1.42
23 1983 1961 152.2 — — — — -52 +15 — 66.2% +0.91 8–8 (50%) 13–6 (68%) 101.9 -1.48 1977 1853 149.0 — — — — -90 +29 — 60.8% +0.85 7–10 (41%) 5–5 (50%) 94.1 +1.51
24 1984 2075 162.7 — — — — -57 +57 -408 74.2% +1.57 14–6 (70%) 28–8 (78%) 112.5 -0.36 1978 1908 153.4 — — — — -103 +93 — 65.6% +1.25 14–8 (64%) 6–9 (40%) 101.1 +1.19
25 1985 1972 156.7 — — — — +24 +63 — 59.6% +0.84 8–6 (57%) 6–3 (67%) 100.0 -2.07 1979 1814 149.3 — — — — -60 +157 -208 60.4% +0.93 12–7 (63%) 6–8 (43%) 98.7 +1.25
26 1986 1899 151.6 — — — — +57 +84 — 65.3% +0.96 19–3 (86%) 15–13 (54%) 104.4 +0.32 1980 1931 156.3 — — — — -176 +80 -225 69.6% +1.32 9–6 (60%) 9–8 (53%) 99.7 -0.18
27 1987 1914 153.2 — — — — +9 +79 -210 65.7% +0.91 13–5 (72%) 19–11 (63%) 105.9 -0.88 1981 1940 157.8 — — — — -191 +103 -216 67.1% +1.22 11–6 (65%) 12–9 (57%) 101.9 -0.14
28 1988 1808 143.7 — — — — -7 +174 — 59.9% +0.53 14–6 (70%) 13–4 (76%) 107.9 +0.08 1982 1864 151.2 — — — — -49 +58 — 58.3% +0.42 19–8 (70%) 15–10 (60%) 105.6 -0.65
29 1989 1869 146.8 — — — — -39 +112 — 60.4% +0.46 9–7 (56%) 13–12 (52%) 97.9 -1.82 1983 1784 148.0 — — — — +17 +44 — 46.9% +0.09 4–4 (50%) 2–6 (25%) 94.5 -1.31
30 1990 1719 152.3 — — — — -59 +350 — 56.2% +0.37 14–14 (50%) 22–13 (63%) 98.8 +1.72 1984 1751 140.2 — — — — -22 +109 — 49.0% -0.10 6–4 (60%) 7–12 (37%) 99.3 -1.48
31 1991 1720 132.4 +1.72 -0.14 1.075 51.3% -41 +210 — 52.1% +0.27 8–8 (50%) 6–5 (55%) 97.3 +1.82 1985 1645 133.7 — — — — +37 +90 — 40.0% -0.42 3–4 (43%) 4–8 (33%) 94.8 -1.57
32 1992 1676 124.1 +0.46 -0.28 0.968 49.8% -20 +116 — 50.0% +0.13 3–3 (50%) 3–5 (38%) 94.6 -0.39 1986 1643 107.5 — — — — — +109 — 40.0% -0.40 2–0 1–2 (33%) — +0.18
33 1993 1607 107.6 -1.77 +0.32 0.915 48.6% — +122 — 38.1% -0.95 1–4 (20%) 4–1 (80%) 98.4 +0.27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2094 156.6 +0.93 -0.14 1.018 50.5% -35 +90 -295 61.4% +0.71 154–97 (61%) 181–105 (63%) 109.8 -1.07 — 2002 154.5 — — — — -76 +76 -183 59.2% +0.68 108–73 (60%) 86–93 (48%) 99.3 +0.11

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.