H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Andres Gomez vs Buster C Mottram H2H: 0-1
Buster C Mottram holds a 1–0 lead over Andres Gomez in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Buster C Mottram leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Buster C Mottram won the 1981 Rome second round 6-4 1-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ECU
Age 66
Left-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
GBR
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 20, 1981* | Rome | Masters 1000 | R64 | Clay | Buster C Mottram | 6-4 1-6 6-3 | Andres Gomez | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andres Gomez | #1,171 | #4 | 2,005 | 2,092 | 502 | 261 | 65.8% | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 18 | 21 |
| Buster C Mottram | #735 | #15 | 0 | 1,952 | 270 | 177 | 60.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Andres Gomez | Buster C Mottram | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1979 | 11–8 | 57.9% | #61 | 1,638 | 0 | 0 | 1970 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 1980 | 36–23 | 61.0% | #42 | 1,800 | 0 | 0 | 1971 | 2–1 | 66.7% | — | 1,536 | 0 | 0 |
| 1981 | 36–21 | 63.2% | #37 | 1,899 | 0 | 1 | 1972 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,548 | 0 | 0 |
| 1982 | 51–25 | 67.1% | #15 | 1,885 | 0 | 3 | 1973 | 14–11 | 56.0% | #33 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 |
| 1983 | 43–20 | 68.3% | #14 | 1,959 | 0 | 4 | 1974 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #55 | 1,767 | 0 | 0 |
| 1984 | 60–13 | 82.2% | #5 | 2,072 | 0 | 9 | 1975 | 26–15 | 63.4% | #34 | 1,897 | 0 | 2 |
| 1985 | 26–14 | 65.0% | #15 | 1,970 | 0 | 10 | 1976 | 33–16 | 67.3% | #41 | 1,852 | 0 | 3 |
| 1986 | 57–20 | 74.0% | #10 | 1,898 | 0 | 14 | 1977 | 46–22 | 67.6% | #20 | 1,909 | 0 | 3 |
| 1987 | 46–18 | 71.9% | #11 | 1,913 | 0 | 15 | 1978 | 29–18 | 61.7% | #28 | 1,812 | 0 | 3 |
| 1988 | 34–18 | 65.4% | #24 | 1,808 | 0 | 15 | 1979 | 34–21 | 61.8% | #32 | 1,873 | 0 | 3 |
| 1989 | 32–17 | 65.3% | #17 | 1,868 | 0 | 17 | 1980 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #43 | 1,824 | 0 | 3 |
| 1990 | 38–27 | 58.5% | #6 | 1,726 | 1 | 20 | 1981 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #72 | 1,773 | 0 | 3 |
| 1991 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #70 | 1,722 | 1 | 21 | 1982 | 28–16 | 63.6% | #20 | 1,840 | 0 | 3 |
| 1992 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #179 | 1,676 | 1 | 21 | 1983 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #91 | 1,703 | 0 | 3 |
| 1993 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #402 | 1,606 | 1 | 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |