H2H data updated: 2026-09-07 00:00 UTC

Andres Gomez vs Claudio Mezzadri H2H: 2-1

Andres Gomez holds a 2–1 lead over Claudio Mezzadri in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Andres Gomez leads 2–1 on clay. Most recently, Andres Gomez won the 1993 Atlanta round of 16 7-6(4) 4-6 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Andres Gomez
ECU Age 66 Left-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main-draw meetings
Claudio Mezzadri
SUI Age 61 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Andres Gomez #234 7-6(4) 4-6 6-3 Claudio Mezzadri #108 Match data Apr 30, 1993* R16 Atlanta ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Clay
Claudio Mezzadri #100 6-3 7-5 Andres Gomez #217 Match data Apr 15, 1993* R32 Charlotte ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Clay
Andres Gomez #12 2-6 6-2 6-4 Claudio Mezzadri #170 Match data May 24, 1986* SF Florence ATP 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Andres Gomez #1,171 #4 2,005 2,094 502 261 65.8% 1 0 0 3 17 21
Claudio Mezzadri #1,238 #26 539 1,801 105 131 44.5% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Andres Gomez Claudio Mezzadri
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 1983 1–3 25.0% #831 1,482 0 0
19 1979 11–8 57.9% #61 1,639 0 0 1984 7–11 38.9% #151 1,515 0 0
20 1980 36–23 61.0% #42 1,802 0 0 1985 5–8 38.5% #135 1,520 0 0
21 1981 36–21 63.2% #37 1,901 0 1 1986 12–16 42.9% #138 1,587 0 0
22 1982 51–25 67.1% #15 1,887 0 3 1987 25–16 61.0% #28 1,772 0 1
23 1983 43–20 68.3% #14 1,960 0 4 1988 13–15 46.4% #105 1,660 0 1
24 1984 60–13 82.2% #5 2,074 0 9 1989 10–14 41.7% #230 1,581 0 1
25 1985 26–14 65.0% #15 1,971 0 10 1990 2–3 40.0% #305 1,585 0 1
26 1986 57–20 74.0% #10 1,898 0 14 1991 5–7 41.7% #127 1,590 0 1
27 1987 46–18 71.9% #11 1,913 0 15 1992 13–16 44.8% #97 1,596 0 1
28 1988 34–18 65.4% #24 1,808 0 15 1993 12–22 35.3% #134 1,518 0 1
29 1989 32–17 65.3% #17 1,869 0 17 — — — — — — —
30 1990 38–27 58.5% #6 1,719 1 20 — — — — — — —
31 1991 20–19 51.3% #70 1,720 1 21 — — — — — — —
32 1992 10–12 45.5% #179 1,675 1 21 — — — — — — —
33 1993 2–6 25.0% #402 1,606 1 21 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Andres Gomez Claudio Mezzadri
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
19 1979 1 1 2 50.0% 10 7 17 58.8% — — — — — — — — 1984 0 1 1 0.0% 7 9 16 43.8% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
20 1980 2 2 4 50.0% 30 17 47 63.8% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1985 — — — — 5 8 13 38.5% — — — — — — — —
21 1981 4 3 7 57.1% 32 16 48 66.7% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 1986 1 3 4 25.0% 10 12 22 45.5% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
22 1982 3 2 5 60.0% 38 16 54 70.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 1987 6 4 10 60.0% 17 8 25 68.0% — — — — 2 4 6 33.3%
23 1983 16 6 22 72.7% 21 10 31 67.7% — — — — 6 4 10 60.0% 1988 2 4 6 33.3% 9 9 18 50.0% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0%
24 1984 11 3 14 78.6% 35 5 40 87.5% 4 1 5 80.0% 10 4 14 71.4% 1989 2 3 5 40.0% 7 9 16 43.8% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3%
25 1985 11 3 14 78.6% 8 6 14 57.1% — — — — 7 5 12 58.3% 1990 — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — —
26 1986 18 5 23 78.3% 34 9 43 79.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 1991 0 1 1 0.0% 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
27 1987 15 6 21 71.4% 23 8 31 74.2% 3 1 4 75.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 1992 2 2 4 50.0% 10 11 21 47.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
28 1988 17 9 26 65.4% 15 6 21 71.4% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% 1993 3 7 10 30.0% 9 13 22 40.9% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0%
29 1989 12 7 19 63.2% 18 8 26 69.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1990 10 10 20 50.0% 24 6 30 80.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 10 14 28.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1991 8 10 18 44.4% 6 8 14 42.9% — — — — 6 1 7 85.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1992 2 3 5 40.0% 8 9 17 47.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1993 0 2 2 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 130 72 202 64.4% 304 135 439 69.2% 10 8 18 55.6% 58 46 104 55.8% — 17 26 43 39.5% 81 89 170 47.6% 1 3 4 25.0% 6 13 19 31.6%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Andres Gomez Claudio Mezzadri
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 1482 97.2 — — — — — — — 30.0% -1.60 1–1 0–1 — +0.56
19 1979 1640 133.9 — — — — — +23 — 53.3% +0.13 5–1 (83%) 6–1 (86%) 109.8 +0.20 1984 1515 117.4 — — — — — +48 — 44.2% -0.44 2–3 (40%) 2–1 (67%) 101.1 +1.04
20 1980 1803 150.2 — — — — -218 +37 -239 56.6% +0.51 9–5 (64%) 7–5 (58%) 105.2 -1.09 1985 1521 116.6 — — — — — +25 — 40.0% -1.03 2–2 (50%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.64
21 1981 1902 159.2 — — — — -233 +53 — 61.4% +0.73 11–11 (50%) 14–9 (61%) 104.5 -2.54 1986 1587 129.9 — — — — -71 +21 — 47.1% -0.04 2–6 (25%) 2–3 (40%) 96.0 +0.87
22 1982 1887 151.8 — — — — -96 +44 — 60.2% +0.59 18–10 (64%) 12–9 (57%) 104.8 -1.90 1987 1773 147.0 — — — — -147 +24 — 59.6% +0.78 9–6 (60%) 10–5 (67%) 108.3 -0.33
23 1983 1961 152.2 — — — — -52 +15 — 66.2% +0.91 8–8 (50%) 13–6 (68%) 101.9 -1.48 1988 1661 126.8 — — — — -73 +75 — 44.9% -0.16 5–2 (71%) 2–4 (33%) 102.3 -0.30
24 1984 2075 162.7 — — — — -57 +57 -408 74.2% +1.57 14–6 (70%) 28–8 (78%) 112.5 -0.36 1989 1581 122.3 — — — — -12 +75 — 46.6% -0.19 1–5 (17%) 5–2 (71%) 97.5 +1.51
25 1985 1972 156.7 — — — — +24 +63 — 59.6% +0.84 8–6 (57%) 6–3 (67%) 100.0 -2.07 1990 1585 114.2 — — — — — +81 — 45.5% -0.09 2–1 (67%) 0–3 (0%) 99.1 -0.20
26 1986 1899 151.6 — — — — +57 +84 — 65.3% +0.96 19–3 (86%) 15–13 (54%) 104.4 +0.32 1991 1590 126.5 -1.74 +1.94 0.981 49.4% — +105 — 50.0% -0.43 0–4 (0%) 3–1 (75%) 98.0 +0.10
27 1987 1914 153.2 — — — — +9 +79 -210 65.7% +0.91 13–5 (72%) 19–11 (63%) 105.9 -0.88 1992 1596 123.3 +0.13 -1.64 0.931 48.8% -27 +52 — 45.5% -0.26 7–8 (47%) 4–5 (44%) 97.7 +0.10
28 1988 1808 143.7 — — — — -7 +174 — 59.9% +0.53 14–6 (70%) 13–4 (76%) 107.9 +0.08 1993 1519 120.8 -1.90 -1.17 0.947 48.7% -25 +105 — 38.5% -0.68 5–6 (45%) 4–6 (40%) 98.5 +1.06
29 1989 1869 146.8 — — — — -39 +112 — 60.4% +0.46 9–7 (56%) 13–12 (52%) 97.9 -1.82 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1990 1719 152.3 — — — — -59 +350 — 56.2% +0.37 14–14 (50%) 22–13 (63%) 98.8 +1.72 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1991 1720 132.4 +1.72 -0.14 1.075 51.3% -41 +210 — 52.1% +0.27 8–8 (50%) 6–5 (55%) 97.3 +1.82 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1992 1676 124.1 +0.46 -0.28 0.968 49.8% -20 +116 — 50.0% +0.13 3–3 (50%) 3–5 (38%) 94.6 -0.39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1993 1607 107.6 -1.77 +0.32 0.915 48.6% — +122 — 38.1% -0.95 1–4 (20%) 4–1 (80%) 98.4 +0.27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2094 156.6 +0.93 -0.14 1.018 50.5% -35 +90 -295 61.4% +0.71 154–97 (61%) 181–105 (63%) 109.8 -1.07 — 1801 134.2 -1.11 -0.88 0.947 48.8% -69 +57 — 46.7% -0.18 36–44 (45%) 34–32 (52%) 99.6 +2.16

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.