H2H data updated: 2026-09-05 00:00 UTC

Andres Gomez vs Danie Visser H2H: 5-0

Andres Gomez holds a 5–0 lead over Danie Visser in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Andres Gomez leads 4–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Andres Gomez won the 1989 US Open round of 64 3-6 6-3 6-4 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Andres Gomez
ECU Age 66 Left-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
5 – 0
5 main-draw meetings
Danie Visser
RSA Age 65 Left-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Andres Gomez #30 3-6 6-3 6-4 6-4 Danie Visser #112 Match data Sep 1, 1989* R64 US Open Grand Slam Hard
Andres Gomez #10 6-1 7-5 Danie Visser #100 Match data Nov 19, 1987* R32 South African Open ATP 250 Hard
Andres Gomez #17 6-3 6-3 Danie Visser #143 Match data Feb 13, 1986* R32 Miami Open ATP 500 Hard
Andres Gomez #39 7-5 7-5 5-7 6-4 Danie Visser Match data May 27, 1983* R64 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay
Andres Gomez #17 3-6 6-1 6-2 Danie Visser Match data Nov 26, 1982* R16 South African Open ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Andres Gomez #1,171 #4 2,005 2,094 502 261 65.8% 1 0 0 3 17 21
Danie Visser #749 #59 191 1,709 92 129 41.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Andres Gomez Danie Visser
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 1979 11–8 57.9% #61 1,639 0 0 1981 1–2 33.3% — 1,506 0 0
20 1980 36–23 61.0% #42 1,802 0 0 1982 7–18 28.0% #93 1,483 0 0
21 1981 36–21 63.2% #37 1,901 0 1 1983 7–12 36.8% #138 1,495 0 0
22 1982 51–25 67.1% #15 1,887 0 3 1984 13–14 48.1% #72 1,618 0 0
23 1983 43–20 68.3% #14 1,960 0 4 1985 13–20 39.4% #145 1,642 0 0
24 1984 60–13 82.2% #5 2,074 0 9 1986 15–14 51.7% #83 1,676 0 0
25 1985 26–14 65.0% #15 1,971 0 10 1987 11–16 40.7% #136 1,635 0 0
26 1986 57–20 74.0% #10 1,898 0 14 1988 9–13 40.9% #143 1,591 0 0
27 1987 46–18 71.9% #11 1,913 0 15 1989 10–13 43.5% #141 1,621 0 0
28 1988 34–18 65.4% #24 1,808 0 15 1990 5–5 50.0% #197 1,652 0 0
29 1989 32–17 65.3% #17 1,869 0 17 1991 1–2 33.3% #405 1,642 0 0
30 1990 38–27 58.5% #6 1,719 1 20 — — — — — — —
31 1991 20–19 51.3% #70 1,720 1 21 — — — — — — —
32 1992 10–12 45.5% #179 1,675 1 21 — — — — — — —
33 1993 2–6 25.0% #402 1,606 1 21 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Andres Gomez Danie Visser
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
19 1979 1 1 2 50.0% 10 7 17 58.8% — — — — — — — — 1981 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1980 2 2 4 50.0% 30 17 47 63.8% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1982 3 7 10 30.0% 1 6 7 14.3% 2 4 6 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0%
21 1981 4 3 7 57.1% 32 16 48 66.7% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 1983 6 6 12 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
22 1982 3 2 5 60.0% 38 16 54 70.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 1984 7 9 16 43.8% 1 2 3 33.3% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — —
23 1983 16 6 22 72.7% 21 10 31 67.7% — — — — 6 4 10 60.0% 1985 6 9 15 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 6 8 14 42.9% 0 2 2 0.0%
24 1984 11 3 14 78.6% 35 5 40 87.5% 4 1 5 80.0% 10 4 14 71.4% 1986 8 8 16 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 1985 11 3 14 78.6% 8 6 14 57.1% — — — — 7 5 12 58.3% 1987 6 7 13 46.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 6 10 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
26 1986 18 5 23 78.3% 34 9 43 79.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 1988 4 7 11 36.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
27 1987 15 6 21 71.4% 23 8 31 74.2% 3 1 4 75.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 1989 6 9 15 40.0% — — — — 4 4 8 50.0% — — — —
28 1988 17 9 26 65.4% 15 6 21 71.4% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% 1990 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0%
29 1989 12 7 19 63.2% 18 8 26 69.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1991 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
30 1990 10 10 20 50.0% 24 6 30 80.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 10 14 28.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1991 8 10 18 44.4% 6 8 14 42.9% — — — — 6 1 7 85.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1992 2 3 5 40.0% 8 9 17 47.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1993 0 2 2 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 130 72 202 64.4% 304 135 439 69.2% 10 8 18 55.6% 58 46 104 55.8% — 51 67 118 43.2% 4 15 19 21.1% 31 36 67 46.3% 6 11 17 35.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Andres Gomez Danie Visser
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
19 1979 1640 133.9 — — — — — +23 — 53.3% +0.13 5–1 (83%) 6–1 (86%) 109.8 +0.20 1981 1507 107.7 — — — — +43 — — 50.0% -0.63 0–2 2–0 — +0.01
20 1980 1803 150.2 — — — — -218 +37 -239 56.6% +0.51 9–5 (64%) 7–5 (58%) 105.2 -1.09 1982 1483 114.0 — — — — +43 -13 +61 39.7% -0.84 1–9 (10%) 9–7 (56%) 95.2 +1.20
21 1981 1902 159.2 — — — — -233 +53 — 61.4% +0.73 11–11 (50%) 14–9 (61%) 104.5 -2.54 1983 1496 111.4 — — — — +39 -38 — 42.3% -0.17 3–5 (38%) 5–5 (50%) 100.5 +1.59
22 1982 1887 151.8 — — — — -96 +44 — 60.2% +0.59 18–10 (64%) 12–9 (57%) 104.8 -1.90 1984 1618 134.7 — — — — -27 -150 +4 50.0% -0.04 7–7 (50%) 5–8 (38%) 101.4 -0.82
23 1983 1961 152.2 — — — — -52 +15 — 66.2% +0.91 8–8 (50%) 13–6 (68%) 101.9 -1.48 1985 1643 120.9 — — — — -82 — +8 42.9% -0.37 4–6 (40%) 7–11 (39%) 97.0 +0.53
24 1984 2075 162.7 — — — — -57 +57 -408 74.2% +1.57 14–6 (70%) 28–8 (78%) 112.5 -0.36 1986 1676 124.7 — — — — -64 — +38 51.4% -0.11 4–5 (44%) 6–7 (46%) 101.0 +0.55
25 1985 1972 156.7 — — — — +24 +63 — 59.6% +0.84 8–6 (57%) 6–3 (67%) 100.0 -2.07 1987 1635 124.7 — — — — -10 — +22 43.4% -0.35 3–4 (43%) 10–7 (59%) 102.4 -1.15
26 1986 1899 151.6 — — — — +57 +84 — 65.3% +0.96 19–3 (86%) 15–13 (54%) 104.4 +0.32 1988 1591 112.9 — — — — -2 — +38 41.4% -0.38 4–3 (57%) 3–6 (33%) 99.9 +1.16
27 1987 1914 153.2 — — — — +9 +79 -210 65.7% +0.91 13–5 (72%) 19–11 (63%) 105.9 -0.88 1989 1621 129.7 — — — — -23 — +15 44.4% -0.11 4–4 (50%) 7–4 (64%) 102.8 -0.79
28 1988 1808 143.7 — — — — -7 +174 — 59.9% +0.53 14–6 (70%) 13–4 (76%) 107.9 +0.08 1990 1652 113.0 — — — — -22 — -22 51.9% -0.11 2–2 (50%) 2–2 (50%) 100.2 -0.54
29 1989 1869 146.8 — — — — -39 +112 — 60.4% +0.46 9–7 (56%) 13–12 (52%) 97.9 -1.82 1991 1643 108.2 -0.83 -4.21 0.649 43.6% -23 — — 37.5% -1.25 1–1 2–1 (67%) — +0.02
30 1990 1719 152.3 — — — — -59 +350 — 56.2% +0.37 14–14 (50%) 22–13 (63%) 98.8 +1.72 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1991 1720 132.4 +1.72 -0.14 1.075 51.3% -41 +210 — 52.1% +0.27 8–8 (50%) 6–5 (55%) 97.3 +1.82 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1992 1676 124.1 +0.46 -0.28 0.968 49.8% -20 +116 — 50.0% +0.13 3–3 (50%) 3–5 (38%) 94.6 -0.39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1993 1607 107.6 -1.77 +0.32 0.915 48.6% — +122 — 38.1% -0.95 1–4 (20%) 4–1 (80%) 98.4 +0.27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2094 156.6 +0.93 -0.14 1.018 50.5% -35 +90 -295 61.4% +0.71 154–97 (61%) 181–105 (63%) 109.8 -1.07 — 1710 127.9 -0.83 -4.21 0.649 43.6% -19 -50 +21 44.9% -0.31 33–48 (41%) 58–58 (50%) 100.6 +0.80

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.