H2H data updated: 2026-09-04 00:00 UTC

Andres Gomez vs Eddie Edwards H2H: 1-1

Andres Gomez and Eddie Edwards are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay. Most recently, Eddie Edwards won the 1983 Hamburg Open round of 64 6-4 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Andres Gomez
ECU Age 66 Left-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main draw meetings
Eddie Edwards
RSA Age 70 Right-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Eddie Edwards 6-4 6-3 Andres Gomez #17 Match data May 11, 1983* R64 Hamburg Open ATP 250 Clay
Andres Gomez #73 4-6 6-2 6-3 1-6 6-3 Eddie Edwards Match data May 27, 1981* R128 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Andres Gomez #1,171 #4 2,005 2,094 502 261 65.8% 1 0 0 3 17 21
Eddie Edwards #985 #42 18 1,742 87 133 39.5% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Andres Gomez Eddie Edwards
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 1975 0–1 0.0% #373 1,497 0 0
19 1979 11–8 57.9% #61 1,639 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1980 36–23 61.0% #42 1,802 0 0 1977 0–1 0.0% — 1,485 0 0
21 1981 36–21 63.2% #37 1,901 0 1 — — — — — — —
22 1982 51–25 67.1% #15 1,887 0 3 1979 2–3 40.0% #231 1,490 0 0
23 1983 43–20 68.3% #14 1,960 0 4 1980 7–9 43.8% #98 1,542 0 0
24 1984 60–13 82.2% #5 2,074 0 9 1981 10–19 34.5% #98 1,503 0 0
25 1985 26–14 65.0% #15 1,971 0 10 1982 14–18 43.8% — 1,572 0 0
26 1986 57–20 74.0% #10 1,898 0 14 1983 6–15 28.6% #171 1,559 0 0
27 1987 46–18 71.9% #11 1,913 0 15 1984 12–13 48.0% #92 1,648 0 0
28 1988 34–18 65.4% #24 1,808 0 15 1985 11–13 45.8% #130 1,649 0 1
29 1989 32–17 65.3% #17 1,869 0 17 1986 15–17 46.9% #63 1,668 0 1
30 1990 38–27 58.5% #6 1,719 1 20 1987 8–18 30.8% #249 1,552 0 1
31 1991 20–19 51.3% #70 1,720 1 21 1988 2–6 25.0% #397 1,532 0 1
32 1992 10–12 45.5% #179 1,675 1 21 — — — — — — —
33 1993 2–6 25.0% #402 1,606 1 21 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Andres Gomez Eddie Edwards
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1975 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1979 1 1 2 50.0% 10 7 17 58.8% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1980 2 2 4 50.0% 30 17 47 63.8% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1977 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1981 4 3 7 57.1% 32 16 48 66.7% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1982 3 2 5 60.0% 38 16 54 70.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 1979 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — —
23 1983 16 6 22 72.7% 21 10 31 67.7% — — — — 6 4 10 60.0% 1980 2 3 5 40.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
24 1984 11 3 14 78.6% 35 5 40 87.5% 4 1 5 80.0% 10 4 14 71.4% 1981 4 7 11 36.4% 0 4 4 0.0% 6 6 12 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
25 1985 11 3 14 78.6% 8 6 14 57.1% — — — — 7 5 12 58.3% 1982 2 5 7 28.6% 6 5 11 54.5% 5 7 12 41.7% 1 1 2 50.0%
26 1986 18 5 23 78.3% 34 9 43 79.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 1983 2 6 8 25.0% 2 6 8 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
27 1987 15 6 21 71.4% 23 8 31 74.2% 3 1 4 75.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 1984 3 6 9 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7% 7 5 12 58.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
28 1988 17 9 26 65.4% 15 6 21 71.4% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% 1985 1 4 5 20.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 10 7 17 58.8% — — — —
29 1989 12 7 19 63.2% 18 8 26 69.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1986 7 10 17 41.2% 1 2 3 33.3% 7 3 10 70.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
30 1990 10 10 20 50.0% 24 6 30 80.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 10 14 28.6% 1987 3 8 11 27.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 7 11 36.4% 1 2 3 33.3%
31 1991 8 10 18 44.4% 6 8 14 42.9% — — — — 6 1 7 85.7% 1988 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
32 1992 2 3 5 40.0% 8 9 17 47.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1993 0 2 2 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 130 72 202 64.4% 304 135 439 69.2% 10 8 18 55.6% 58 46 104 55.8% — 26 56 82 31.7% 16 25 41 39.0% 40 41 81 49.4% 5 11 16 31.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Andres Gomez Eddie Edwards
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1975 1498 104.7 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.13
19 1979 1640 133.9 — — — — — +23 — 53.3% +0.13 5–1 (83%) 6–1 (86%) — +0.20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1980 1803 150.2 — — — — -218 +37 -239 56.6% +0.51 9–5 (64%) 7–5 (58%) — -1.09 1977 1485 98.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — 0–1 — +0.18
21 1981 1902 159.2 — — — — -233 +53 — 61.4% +0.73 11–11 (50%) 14–9 (61%) — -2.54 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1982 1887 151.8 — — — — -96 +44 — 60.2% +0.59 18–10 (64%) 12–9 (57%) — -1.90 1979 1491 109.4 — — — — — +57 — 46.2% -0.46 1–2 (33%) — — +0.42
23 1983 1961 152.2 — — — — -52 +15 — 66.2% +0.91 8–8 (50%) 13–6 (68%) — -1.48 1980 1543 123.3 — — — — +6 +34 -31 45.2% -0.29 3–5 (38%) 2–3 (40%) — +0.80
24 1984 2075 162.7 — — — — -57 +57 -408 74.2% +1.57 14–6 (70%) 28–8 (78%) — -0.36 1981 1504 118.2 — — — — +18 +24 +49 39.0% -0.77 4–6 (40%) 4–4 (50%) — +1.71
25 1985 1972 156.7 — — — — +24 +63 — 59.6% +0.84 8–6 (57%) 6–3 (67%) — -2.07 1982 1572 127.4 — — — — -50 +26 -13 42.2% -0.45 8–5 (62%) 4–5 (44%) — -0.69
26 1986 1899 151.6 — — — — +57 +84 — 65.3% +0.96 19–3 (86%) 15–13 (54%) — +0.32 1983 1560 135.7 — — — — +4 +2 — 37.0% -0.80 0–7 (0%) 6–5 (55%) — -1.12
27 1987 1914 153.2 — — — — +9 +79 -210 65.7% +0.91 13–5 (72%) 19–11 (63%) — -0.88 1984 1649 127.0 — — — — -86 -53 +21 50.0% 0.00 4–3 (57%) 6–6 (50%) — -0.37
28 1988 1808 143.7 — — — — -7 +174 — 59.9% +0.53 14–6 (70%) 13–4 (76%) — +0.08 1985 1650 119.9 — — — — -123 — +63 46.7% +0.05 3–5 (38%) 3–10 (23%) — +0.74
29 1989 1869 146.8 — — — — -39 +112 — 60.4% +0.46 9–7 (56%) 13–12 (52%) — -1.82 1986 1669 122.4 — — — — -93 -114 +124 44.4% -0.32 9–5 (64%) 8–9 (47%) — +0.75
30 1990 1719 152.3 — — — — -59 +350 — 56.2% +0.37 14–14 (50%) 22–13 (63%) — +1.72 1987 1553 117.7 — — — — -27 — +123 40.3% -0.51 3–9 (25%) 3–4 (43%) — +0.54
31 1991 1720 132.4 +1.72 -0.14 1.075 51.3% -41 +210 — 52.1% +0.27 8–8 (50%) 6–5 (55%) — +1.82 1988 1533 116.6 — — — — -4 — — 36.4% -0.50 0–1 1–5 (17%) — +0.45
32 1992 1676 124.1 +0.46 -0.28 0.968 49.8% -20 +116 — 50.0% +0.13 3–3 (50%) 3–5 (38%) — -0.39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1993 1607 107.6 -1.77 +0.32 0.915 48.6% — +122 — 38.1% -0.95 1–4 (20%) 4–1 (80%) — +0.27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2094 156.6 +0.93 -0.14 1.018 50.5% -35 +90 -295 61.4% +0.71 154–97 (61%) 181–105 (63%) 109.8 -1.07 — 1742 130.0 — — — — -40 +8 +54 42.6% -0.42 35–48 (42%) 37–52 (42%) 95.6 +1.49

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.