H2H data updated: 2026-10-20 00:00 UTC

Andres Gomez vs Francesco Cancellotti H2H: 2-0

Andres Gomez holds a 2–0 lead over Francesco Cancellotti in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Andres Gomez leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Andres Gomez won the 1989 Florence round of 16 7-5 7-6.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Andres Gomez
ECU Age 66 Left-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main-draw meetings
Francesco Cancellotti
ITA Age 63 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Andres Gomez #28 7-5 7-6 Francesco Cancellotti #77 Match data May 26, 1989* R16 Florence ATP 250 Clay
Andres Gomez #5 7-6 6-3 Francesco Cancellotti #23 Match data Nov 8, 1984* R32 Wembley ATP 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Andres Gomez #1,171 #4 2,005 2,094 502 261 65.8% 1 0 0 3 17 21
Francesco Cancellotti #708 #21 264 1,858 111 112 49.8% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Andres Gomez Francesco Cancellotti
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 1981 1–2 33.3% — 1,504 0 0
19 1979 11–8 57.9% #61 1,639 0 0 1982 1–4 20.0% — 1,464 0 0
20 1980 36–23 61.0% #42 1,802 0 0 1983 14–9 60.9% #69 1,624 0 0
21 1981 36–21 63.2% #37 1,901 0 1 1984 25–12 67.6% #26 1,796 0 2
22 1982 51–25 67.1% #15 1,887 0 3 1985 18–15 54.5% #58 1,748 0 2
23 1983 43–20 68.3% #14 1,960 0 4 1986 7–16 30.4% #242 1,575 0 2
24 1984 60–13 82.2% #5 2,074 0 9 1987 16–13 55.2% #74 1,633 0 2
25 1985 26–14 65.0% #15 1,971 0 10 1988 11–16 40.7% #107 1,582 0 2
26 1986 57–20 74.0% #10 1,898 0 14 1989 16–17 48.5% #114 1,585 0 2
27 1987 46–18 71.9% #11 1,913 0 15 1990 1–5 16.7% #258 1,554 0 2
28 1988 34–18 65.4% #24 1,808 0 15 1991 1–3 25.0% #280 1,528 0 2
29 1989 32–17 65.3% #17 1,869 0 17 — — — — — — —
30 1990 38–27 58.5% #6 1,719 1 20 — — — — — — —
31 1991 20–19 51.3% #70 1,720 1 21 — — — — — — —
32 1992 10–12 45.5% #179 1,675 1 21 — — — — — — —
33 1993 2–6 25.0% #402 1,606 1 21 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Andres Gomez Francesco Cancellotti
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
19 1979 1 1 2 50.0% 10 7 17 58.8% — — — — — — — — 1982 — — — — 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — —
20 1980 2 2 4 50.0% 30 17 47 63.8% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1983 — — — — 14 8 22 63.6% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1981 4 3 7 57.1% 32 16 48 66.7% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 1984 0 1 1 0.0% 25 10 35 71.4% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
22 1982 3 2 5 60.0% 38 16 54 70.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 1985 0 1 1 0.0% 18 14 32 56.3% — — — — — — — —
23 1983 16 6 22 72.7% 21 10 31 67.7% — — — — 6 4 10 60.0% 1986 1 1 2 50.0% 6 14 20 30.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
24 1984 11 3 14 78.6% 35 5 40 87.5% 4 1 5 80.0% 10 4 14 71.4% 1987 2 2 4 50.0% 14 11 25 56.0% — — — — — — — —
25 1985 11 3 14 78.6% 8 6 14 57.1% — — — — 7 5 12 58.3% 1988 1 2 3 33.3% 10 12 22 45.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 1986 18 5 23 78.3% 34 9 43 79.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 1989 1 2 3 33.3% 15 14 29 51.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
27 1987 15 6 21 71.4% 23 8 31 74.2% 3 1 4 75.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 1990 0 1 1 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — —
28 1988 17 9 26 65.4% 15 6 21 71.4% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% 1991 — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — —
29 1989 12 7 19 63.2% 18 8 26 69.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1990 10 10 20 50.0% 24 6 30 80.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 10 14 28.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1991 8 10 18 44.4% 6 8 14 42.9% — — — — 6 1 7 85.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1992 2 3 5 40.0% 8 9 17 47.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1993 0 2 2 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 130 72 202 64.4% 304 135 439 69.2% 10 8 18 55.6% 58 46 104 55.8% — 5 10 15 33.3% 106 96 202 52.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 4 4 0.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Andres Gomez Francesco Cancellotti
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 1505 109.3 — — — — — +30 — 33.3% -1.50 — 2–1 (67%) — +0.12
19 1979 1640 133.9 — — — — — +23 — 53.3% +0.13 5–1 (83%) 6–1 (86%) 109.8 +0.20 1982 1464 100.3 — — — — — +26 — 33.3% -1.08 0–2 0–2 — +0.92
20 1980 1803 150.1 — — — — -218 +37 -239 56.6% +0.51 9–5 (64%) 7–5 (58%) 105.2 -1.09 1983 1624 134.7 — — — — — +59 — 56.0% +0.16 6–2 (75%) 4–1 (80%) 107.4 +1.58
21 1981 1902 159.2 — — — — -233 +53 — 61.4% +0.73 11–11 (50%) 14–9 (61%) 104.5 -2.54 1984 1797 145.8 — — — — — +71 — 65.5% +0.96 3–4 (43%) 9–4 (69%) 102.6 +1.23
22 1982 1887 151.8 — — — — -96 +44 — 60.2% +0.59 18–10 (64%) 12–9 (57%) 104.8 -1.90 1985 1749 140.2 — — — — — +44 — 53.1% +0.20 5–3 (63%) 5–6 (45%) 98.7 -1.37
23 1983 1961 152.2 — — — — -52 +15 — 66.2% +0.91 8–8 (50%) 13–6 (68%) 101.9 -1.48 1986 1576 123.9 — — — — -82 +54 — 39.0% -0.88 3–8 (27%) 2–3 (40%) 92.4 +0.39
24 1984 2075 162.7 — — — — -57 +57 -408 74.2% +1.57 14–6 (70%) 28–8 (78%) 112.5 -0.36 1987 1633 133.0 — — — — -109 +35 — 53.8% +0.35 4–7 (36%) 3–2 (60%) 100.2 +1.47
25 1985 1972 156.7 — — — — +24 +63 — 59.6% +0.84 8–6 (57%) 6–3 (67%) 100.0 -2.07 1988 1582 125.7 — — — — -58 +35 — 47.1% -0.12 1–6 (14%) 1–3 (25%) 93.2 +0.52
26 1986 1899 151.6 — — — — +57 +84 — 65.3% +0.96 19–3 (86%) 15–13 (54%) 104.4 +0.32 1989 1585 122.6 — — — — -71 +22 — 50.0% -0.12 5–6 (45%) 4–5 (44%) 98.7 +1.26
27 1987 1914 153.2 — — — — +9 +79 -210 65.7% +0.91 13–5 (72%) 19–11 (63%) 105.9 -0.88 1990 1554 101.9 — — — — — +21 — 29.4% -1.29 0–1 1–2 (33%) — -0.05
28 1988 1808 143.7 — — — — -7 +174 — 59.9% +0.53 14–6 (70%) 13–4 (76%) 107.9 +0.08 1991 1528 101.1 -1.83 -2.46 0.998 49.8% — +31 — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 — — +0.40
29 1989 1869 146.8 — — — — -39 +112 — 60.4% +0.46 9–7 (56%) 13–12 (52%) 97.9 -1.82 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1990 1719 152.3 — — — — -59 +350 — 56.2% +0.37 14–14 (50%) 22–13 (63%) 98.8 +1.72 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1991 1720 132.4 +1.72 -0.14 1.075 51.3% -41 +210 — 52.1% +0.27 8–8 (50%) 6–5 (55%) 97.3 +1.81 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1992 1676 124.1 +0.46 -0.28 0.968 49.8% -20 +116 — 50.0% +0.13 3–3 (50%) 3–5 (38%) 94.6 -0.39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1993 1607 107.6 -1.77 +0.32 0.915 48.6% — +122 — 38.1% -0.95 1–4 (20%) 4–1 (80%) 98.4 +0.27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2094 156.6 +0.93 -0.14 1.018 50.5% -35 +90 -295 61.4% +0.71 154–97 (61%) 181–105 (63%) 109.8 -1.07 — 1859 137.7 -1.83 -2.46 0.998 49.8% -81 +45 — 50.8% 0.00 27–40 (40%) 31–29 (52%) 95.0 +2.93

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.