H2H data updated: 2026-09-08 00:00 UTC

Andres Gomez vs Heinz Gunthardt H2H: 3-2

Andres Gomez holds a 3–2 lead over Heinz Gunthardt in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Andres Gomez leads 2–1 on clay and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Andres Gomez won the 1984 Indianapolis semifinal 7-6 7-6.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Andres Gomez
ECU Age 66 Left-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
3 – 2
5 main-draw meetings
Heinz Gunthardt
SUI Age 67 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Andres Gomez #5 7-6 7-6 Heinz Gunthardt #28 Match data Aug 11, 1984* SF Indianapolis ATP 250 Clay
Andres Gomez #13 6-2 4-6 6-2 Heinz Gunthardt #33 Match data Nov 10, 1983* R32 Wembley ATP 250 Carpet
Heinz Gunthardt #44 4-6 6-2 6-4 Andres Gomez #22 Match data Apr 8, 1982* R32 Monte-Carlo Masters ATP 250 Clay
Heinz Gunthardt #53 6-4 4-6 6-3 Andres Gomez #44 Match data Oct 17, 1981* QF Swiss Indoors ATP 250 Hard
Andres Gomez #65 6-2 6-2 Heinz Gunthardt #32 Match data May 14, 1980* R64 Hamburg Open ATP 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Andres Gomez #1,171 #4 2,005 2,094 502 261 65.8% 1 0 0 3 17 21
Heinz Gunthardt #1,013 #22 0 1,969 225 189 54.3% 0 0 0 0 5 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Andres Gomez Heinz Gunthardt
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 1976 1–4 20.0% #210 1,496 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1977 3–6 33.3% #234 1,509 0 0
19 1979 11–8 57.9% #61 1,639 0 0 1978 25–25 50.0% #55 1,765 0 1
20 1980 36–23 61.0% #42 1,802 0 0 1979 30–23 56.6% #51 1,815 0 1
21 1981 36–21 63.2% #37 1,901 0 1 1980 37–21 63.8% #26 1,834 0 4
22 1982 51–25 67.1% #15 1,887 0 3 1981 28–22 56.0% #38 1,813 0 4
23 1983 43–20 68.3% #14 1,960 0 4 1982 26–25 51.0% #85 1,722 0 4
24 1984 60–13 82.2% #5 2,074 0 9 1983 27–15 64.3% #25 1,853 0 5
25 1985 26–14 65.0% #15 1,971 0 10 1984 23–19 54.8% #31 1,779 0 5
26 1986 57–20 74.0% #10 1,898 0 14 1985 22–19 53.7% #36 1,820 0 5
27 1987 46–18 71.9% #11 1,913 0 15 1986 3–9 25.0% #251 1,671 0 5
28 1988 34–18 65.4% #24 1,808 0 15 1987 0–1 0.0% #954 1,664 0 5
29 1989 32–17 65.3% #17 1,869 0 17 — — — — — — —
30 1990 38–27 58.5% #6 1,719 1 20 — — — — — — —
31 1991 20–19 51.3% #70 1,720 1 21 — — — — — — —
32 1992 10–12 45.5% #179 1,675 1 21 — — — — — — —
33 1993 2–6 25.0% #402 1,606 1 21 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Andres Gomez Heinz Gunthardt
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1976 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1977 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
19 1979 1 1 2 50.0% 10 7 17 58.8% — — — — — — — — 1978 9 7 16 56.3% 9 12 21 42.9% 1 3 4 25.0% 6 3 9 66.7%
20 1980 2 2 4 50.0% 30 17 47 63.8% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1979 15 9 24 62.5% 13 8 21 61.9% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 5 6 16.7%
21 1981 4 3 7 57.1% 32 16 48 66.7% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 1980 13 6 19 68.4% 11 5 16 68.8% 2 1 3 66.7% 11 9 20 55.0%
22 1982 3 2 5 60.0% 38 16 54 70.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 1981 6 4 10 60.0% 15 10 25 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 7 7 14 50.0%
23 1983 16 6 22 72.7% 21 10 31 67.7% — — — — 6 4 10 60.0% 1982 2 3 5 40.0% 16 12 28 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 8 9 17 47.1%
24 1984 11 3 14 78.6% 35 5 40 87.5% 4 1 5 80.0% 10 4 14 71.4% 1983 10 4 14 71.4% 17 9 26 65.4% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0%
25 1985 11 3 14 78.6% 8 6 14 57.1% — — — — 7 5 12 58.3% 1984 7 6 13 53.8% 12 6 18 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 6 10 40.0%
26 1986 18 5 23 78.3% 34 9 43 79.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 1985 9 7 16 56.3% 6 5 11 54.5% 4 1 5 80.0% 3 6 9 33.3%
27 1987 15 6 21 71.4% 23 8 31 74.2% 3 1 4 75.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 1986 0 1 1 0.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
28 1988 17 9 26 65.4% 15 6 21 71.4% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% 1987 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1989 12 7 19 63.2% 18 8 26 69.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1990 10 10 20 50.0% 24 6 30 80.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 10 14 28.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1991 8 10 18 44.4% 6 8 14 42.9% — — — — 6 1 7 85.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1992 2 3 5 40.0% 8 9 17 47.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1993 0 2 2 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 130 72 202 64.4% 304 135 439 69.2% 10 8 18 55.6% 58 46 104 55.8% — 71 51 122 58.2% 101 76 177 57.1% 10 11 21 47.6% 43 51 94 45.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Andres Gomez Heinz Gunthardt
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1976 1497 106.8 — — — — — +44 — 27.3% -2.09 0–1 0–1 — -0.14
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1977 1510 115.1 — — — — +44 — — 40.0% -0.60 0–2 1–1 — +0.49
19 1979 1640 133.9 — — — — — +23 — 53.3% +0.13 5–1 (83%) 6–1 (86%) 109.8 +0.20 1978 1766 146.9 — — — — +3 -145 -225 48.8% -0.21 10–7 (59%) 9–7 (56%) 107.7 -3.10
20 1980 1803 150.2 — — — — -218 +37 -239 56.6% +0.51 9–5 (64%) 7–5 (58%) 105.2 -1.09 1979 1815 145.2 — — — — -9 -69 — 54.6% +0.22 11–8 (58%) 11–6 (65%) 106.3 -1.34
21 1981 1902 159.2 — — — — -233 +53 — 61.4% +0.73 11–11 (50%) 14–9 (61%) 104.5 -2.54 1980 1835 148.3 — — — — +31 -59 -191 59.5% +0.48 12–8 (60%) 11–5 (69%) 105.9 -2.27
22 1982 1887 151.8 — — — — -96 +44 — 60.2% +0.59 18–10 (64%) 12–9 (57%) 104.8 -1.90 1981 1813 148.5 — — — — -9 +4 — 53.1% +0.19 8–4 (67%) 8–6 (57%) 106.5 -2.56
23 1983 1961 152.2 — — — — -52 +15 — 66.2% +0.91 8–8 (50%) 13–6 (68%) 101.9 -1.48 1982 1722 150.4 — — — — +6 +108 — 50.0% +0.01 5–3 (63%) 8–8 (50%) 100.4 -3.00
24 1984 2075 162.7 — — — — -57 +57 -408 74.2% +1.57 14–6 (70%) 28–8 (78%) 112.5 -0.36 1983 1853 151.4 — — — — -33 0 — 59.8% +0.76 10–9 (53%) 5–9 (36%) 96.3 -0.24
25 1985 1972 156.7 — — — — +24 +63 — 59.6% +0.84 8–6 (57%) 6–3 (67%) 100.0 -2.07 1984 1779 140.1 — — — — -19 +105 — 50.5% +0.08 9–3 (75%) 10–13 (43%) 103.8 -0.50
26 1986 1899 151.6 — — — — +57 +84 — 65.3% +0.96 19–3 (86%) 15–13 (54%) 104.4 +0.32 1985 1820 135.6 — — — — -43 -26 -105 50.0% +0.11 11–6 (65%) 6–11 (35%) 100.8 0.00
27 1987 1914 153.2 — — — — +9 +79 -210 65.7% +0.91 13–5 (72%) 19–11 (63%) 105.9 -0.88 1986 1672 117.2 — — — — +63 +24 — 38.2% -0.35 0–4 (0%) 2–7 (22%) 88.0 +0.03
28 1988 1808 143.7 — — — — -7 +174 — 59.9% +0.53 14–6 (70%) 13–4 (76%) 107.9 +0.08 1987 1665 110.5 — — — — — — — 33.3% -0.67 0–1 — — -0.32
29 1989 1869 146.8 — — — — -39 +112 — 60.4% +0.46 9–7 (56%) 13–12 (52%) 97.9 -1.82 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1990 1719 152.3 — — — — -59 +350 — 56.2% +0.37 14–14 (50%) 22–13 (63%) 98.8 +1.72 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1991 1720 132.4 +1.72 -0.14 1.075 51.3% -41 +210 — 52.1% +0.27 8–8 (50%) 6–5 (55%) 97.3 +1.82 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1992 1676 124.1 +0.46 -0.28 0.968 49.8% -20 +116 — 50.0% +0.13 3–3 (50%) 3–5 (38%) 94.6 -0.39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1993 1607 107.6 -1.77 +0.32 0.915 48.6% — +122 — 38.1% -0.95 1–4 (20%) 4–1 (80%) 98.4 +0.27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2094 156.6 +0.93 -0.14 1.018 50.5% -35 +90 -295 61.4% +0.71 154–97 (61%) 181–105 (63%) 109.8 -1.07 — 1970 150.7 — — — — -3 -2 -167 52.3% +0.15 76–56 (58%) 71–74 (49%) 103.5 -3.13

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.