Andres Gomez
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ivan Lendl | 2 | 16 | 18 | Nov 12, 1990 | H2H |
| Diego Perez | 9 | 4 | 13 | May 4, 1990 | H2H |
| Aaron Krickstein | 8 | 3 | 11 | Dec 15, 1990 | H2H |
| Jimmy Connors | 1 | 10 | 11 | Sep 3, 1989 | H2H |
| Jose Luis Clerc | 3 | 8 | 11 | May 31, 1989 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC
Henri Leconte holds a 4–1 lead over Andres Gomez in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Henri Leconte leads 2–0 on clay, while Andres Gomez leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Henri Leconte won the 1990 Monte-Carlo Masters round of 16 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Henri Leconte | 6-3 6-4 | Andres Gomez | Match data | Apr 28, 1990* | R16 | Monte-Carlo Masters | Masters 1000 | Clay |
| Henri Leconte | 7-5 7-5 7-5 | Andres Gomez | Match data | Jul 1, 1987* | R16 | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | Grass |
| Andres Gomez | 7-6 6-1 | Henri Leconte | Match data | Jan 19, 1986* | R16 | ATP Finals | ATP Finals | Carpet |
| Henri Leconte | 6-4 6-4 | Andres Gomez | Match data | Oct 19, 1985* | QF | Sydney Indoor | ATP 250 | Hard |
| Henri Leconte | 6-3 6-4 6-4 | Andres Gomez | Match data | Jun 2, 1985* | R32 | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | Clay |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andres Gomez | #1,171 | #4 | 2,005 | 2,094 | 502 | 261 | 65.8% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 17 | 21 |
| Henri Leconte | #1,355 | #5 | 948 | 2,064 | 346 | 244 | 58.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 9 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Andres Gomez | Henri Leconte | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #440 | 1,461 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 3–6 | 33.3% | — | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 31–21 | 59.6% | #29 | 1,852 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 1979 | 11–8 | 57.9% | #61 | 1,639 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 35–23 | 60.3% | #30 | 1,828 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1980 | 36–23 | 61.0% | #42 | 1,802 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 26–18 | 59.1% | #27 | 1,867 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 1981 | 36–21 | 63.2% | #37 | 1,901 | 0 | 1 | 1985 | 44–21 | 67.7% | #16 | 1,933 | 0 | 4 |
| 22 | 1982 | 51–25 | 67.1% | #15 | 1,887 | 0 | 3 | 1986 | 38–14 | 73.1% | #6 | 1,973 | 0 | 6 |
| 23 | 1983 | 43–20 | 68.3% | #14 | 1,960 | 0 | 4 | 1987 | 23–16 | 59.0% | #21 | 1,844 | 0 | 6 |
| 24 | 1984 | 60–13 | 82.2% | #5 | 2,074 | 0 | 9 | 1988 | 48–20 | 70.6% | #9 | 1,925 | 0 | 8 |
| 25 | 1985 | 26–14 | 65.0% | #15 | 1,971 | 0 | 10 | 1989 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #115 | 1,792 | 0 | 8 |
| 26 | 1986 | 57–20 | 74.0% | #10 | 1,898 | 0 | 14 | 1990 | 25–17 | 59.5% | #30 | 1,797 | 0 | 8 |
| 27 | 1987 | 46–18 | 71.9% | #11 | 1,913 | 0 | 15 | 1991 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #161 | 1,717 | 0 | 8 |
| 28 | 1988 | 34–18 | 65.4% | #24 | 1,808 | 0 | 15 | 1992 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #61 | 1,820 | 0 | 8 |
| 29 | 1989 | 32–17 | 65.3% | #17 | 1,869 | 0 | 17 | 1993 | 13–11 | 54.2% | #101 | 1,840 | 0 | 9 |
| 30 | 1990 | 38–27 | 58.5% | #6 | 1,719 | 1 | 20 | 1994 | 16–16 | 50.0% | #94 | 1,741 | 0 | 9 |
| 31 | 1991 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #70 | 1,720 | 1 | 21 | 1995 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #134 | 1,635 | 0 | 9 |
| 32 | 1992 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #179 | 1,675 | 1 | 21 | 1996 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #1001 | 1,560 | 0 | 9 |
| 33 | 1993 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #402 | 1,606 | 1 | 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Andres Gomez | Henri Leconte | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 19 | 7 | 26 | 73.1% | 9 | 10 | 19 | 47.4% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% |
| 19 | 1979 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 10 | 7 | 17 | 58.8% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 14 | 8 | 22 | 63.6% | 16 | 9 | 25 | 64.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% |
| 20 | 1980 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 30 | 17 | 47 | 63.8% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 1984 | 8 | 6 | 14 | 57.1% | 11 | 6 | 17 | 64.7% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 7 | 5 | 12 | 58.3% |
| 21 | 1981 | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 32 | 16 | 48 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1985 | 10 | 7 | 17 | 58.8% | 19 | 7 | 26 | 73.1% | 13 | 4 | 17 | 76.5% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% |
| 22 | 1982 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 38 | 16 | 54 | 70.4% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 10 | 6 | 16 | 62.5% | 1986 | 7 | 2 | 9 | 77.8% | 19 | 4 | 23 | 82.6% | 9 | 2 | 11 | 81.8% | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% |
| 23 | 1983 | 16 | 6 | 22 | 72.7% | 21 | 10 | 31 | 67.7% | — | — | — | — | 6 | 4 | 10 | 60.0% | 1987 | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 7 | 3 | 10 | 70.0% | 6 | 3 | 9 | 66.7% |
| 24 | 1984 | 11 | 3 | 14 | 78.6% | 35 | 5 | 40 | 87.5% | 4 | 1 | 5 | 80.0% | 10 | 4 | 14 | 71.4% | 1988 | 8 | 5 | 13 | 61.5% | 24 | 7 | 31 | 77.4% | 3 | 1 | 4 | 75.0% | 13 | 7 | 20 | 65.0% |
| 25 | 1985 | 11 | 3 | 14 | 78.6% | 8 | 6 | 14 | 57.1% | — | — | — | — | 7 | 5 | 12 | 58.3% | 1989 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | — | — | — | — | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% |
| 26 | 1986 | 18 | 5 | 23 | 78.3% | 34 | 9 | 43 | 79.1% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 1990 | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 19 | 8 | 27 | 70.4% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% |
| 27 | 1987 | 15 | 6 | 21 | 71.4% | 23 | 8 | 31 | 74.2% | 3 | 1 | 4 | 75.0% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | 1991 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 5 | 6 | 11 | 45.5% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% |
| 28 | 1988 | 17 | 9 | 26 | 65.4% | 15 | 6 | 21 | 71.4% | — | — | — | — | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 1992 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 8 | 7 | 15 | 53.3% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 6 | 5 | 11 | 54.5% |
| 29 | 1989 | 12 | 7 | 19 | 63.2% | 18 | 8 | 26 | 69.2% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1993 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 8 | 1 | 9 | 88.9% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% |
| 30 | 1990 | 10 | 10 | 20 | 50.0% | 24 | 6 | 30 | 80.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 4 | 10 | 14 | 28.6% | 1994 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% |
| 31 | 1991 | 8 | 10 | 18 | 44.4% | 6 | 8 | 14 | 42.9% | — | — | — | — | 6 | 1 | 7 | 85.7% | 1995 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 2 | 7 | 9 | 22.2% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% |
| 32 | 1992 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 8 | 9 | 17 | 47.1% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1993 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 130 | 72 | 202 | 64.4% | 304 | 135 | 439 | 69.2% | 10 | 8 | 18 | 55.6% | 58 | 46 | 104 | 55.8% | — | 85 | 64 | 149 | 57.0% | 146 | 95 | 241 | 60.6% | 56 | 29 | 85 | 65.9% | 59 | 56 | 115 | 51.3% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 66/69 of Andres Gomez's and 120/136 of Henri Leconte's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Andres Gomez | Henri Leconte | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 27 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 19/20 | 7.2 | 5.3 | 46.5% | 74.1% | 50.9% | 60.1% | 48.7% | 61.7% | 39.2% |
| 28 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 27/34 | 7.6 | 3.7 | 52.3% | 77.5% | 52.8% | 65.7% | 45.7% | 65.7% | 40.2% |
| 29 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 21/24 | 5.8 | 5.6 | 50.8% | 73.6% | 49.4% | 62.4% | 39.5% | 61.8% | 35.7% |
| 30 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 29/32 | 5.4 | 4.2 | 48.1% | 74.7% | 51.4% | 58.2% | 43.0% | 62.6% | 39.6% |
| 31 | 1991 | 37/39 | 5.7 | 2.9 | 56.6% | 73.4% | 50.8% | 57.1% | 46.8% | 63.5% | 39.3% | 1995 | 21/22 | 5.0 | 4.6 | 50.4% | 67.4% | 47.9% | 51.5% | 36.6% | 57.8% | 35.3% |
| 32 | 1992 | 22/22 | 5.8 | 3.9 | 54.4% | 71.8% | 47.2% | 64.5% | 40.1% | 60.5% | 38.3% | 1996 | 3/4 | 3.3 | 5.3 | 40.9% | 67.5% | 44.9% | 52.1% | 25.0% | 53.7% | 33.1% |
| 33 | 1993 | 7/8 | 5.4 | 3.7 | 58.5% | 63.7% | 44.0% | 57.7% | 45.5% | 55.5% | 40.7% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 66/763 | 5.7 | 3.3 | 56.1% | 71.8% | 48.9% | 59.6% | 44.4% | 61.6% | 39.1% | — | 120/590 | 6.1 | 4.6 | 49.5% | 73.6% | 50.5% | 59.6% | 42.3% | 62.0% | 38.1% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Andres Gomez | Henri Leconte | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 1462 | 107.0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 18.2% | -2.64 | 0–1 | 0–1 | — | -0.03 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 1481 | 112.5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | +123 | 40.7% | -0.74 | 1–2 (33%) | 1–0 | — | +0.37 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 1853 | 153.1 | — | — | — | — | +3 | -263 | -281 | 53.3% | +0.41 | 11–6 (65%) | 10–9 (53%) | — | -1.69 |
| 19 | 1979 | 1640 | 133.9 | — | — | — | — | — | +23 | — | 53.3% | +0.13 | 5–1 (83%) | 6–1 (86%) | — | +0.20 | 1983 | 1829 | 160.3 | — | — | — | — | +21 | -60 | — | 57.7% | +0.77 | 12–9 (57%) | 4–9 (31%) | — | -5.74 |
| 20 | 1980 | 1803 | 150.2 | — | — | — | — | -218 | +37 | -239 | 56.6% | +0.51 | 9–5 (64%) | 7–5 (58%) | — | -1.09 | 1984 | 1867 | 156.9 | — | — | — | — | +15 | -26 | — | 57.7% | +0.57 | 7–7 (50%) | 7–7 (50%) | — | -2.73 |
| 21 | 1981 | 1902 | 159.2 | — | — | — | — | -233 | +53 | — | 61.4% | +0.73 | 11–11 (50%) | 14–9 (61%) | — | -2.54 | 1985 | 1934 | 153.7 | — | — | — | — | -90 | -6 | -68 | 65.9% | +1.15 | 9–7 (56%) | 11–15 (42%) | — | -0.38 |
| 22 | 1982 | 1887 | 151.8 | — | — | — | — | -96 | +44 | — | 60.2% | +0.59 | 18–10 (64%) | 12–9 (57%) | — | -1.90 | 1986 | 1973 | 155.3 | — | — | — | — | -103 | +24 | -3 | 71.7% | +1.39 | 6–5 (55%) | 9–5 (64%) | — | -1.49 |
| 23 | 1983 | 1961 | 152.2 | — | — | — | — | -52 | +15 | — | 66.2% | +0.91 | 8–8 (50%) | 13–6 (68%) | — | -1.48 | 1987 | 1844 | 139.2 | — | — | — | — | +4 | +40 | +96 | 58.2% | +0.56 | 8–7 (53%) | 13–10 (57%) | — | +1.37 |
| 24 | 1984 | 2075 | 162.7 | — | — | — | — | -57 | +57 | -408 | 74.2% | +1.57 | 14–6 (70%) | 28–8 (78%) | — | -0.36 | 1988 | 1925 | 151.1 | — | — | — | — | -40 | +57 | -10 | 63.2% | +0.85 | 14–1 (93%) | 15–12 (56%) | — | -1.80 |
| 25 | 1985 | 1972 | 156.7 | — | — | — | — | +24 | +63 | — | 59.6% | +0.84 | 8–6 (57%) | 6–3 (67%) | — | -2.07 | 1989 | 1792 | 131.0 | — | — | — | — | -11 | +138 | — | 46.9% | -0.02 | 5–3 (63%) | 4–4 (50%) | — | -0.39 |
| 26 | 1986 | 1899 | 151.6 | — | — | — | — | +57 | +84 | — | 65.3% | +0.96 | 19–3 (86%) | 15–13 (54%) | — | +0.32 | 1990 | 1797 | 147.6 | — | — | — | — | -76 | +181 | +71 | 61.2% | +0.68 | 7–9 (44%) | 6–6 (50%) | — | -0.20 |
| 27 | 1987 | 1914 | 153.2 | — | — | — | — | +9 | +79 | -210 | 65.7% | +0.91 | 13–5 (72%) | 19–11 (63%) | — | -0.88 | 1991 | 1717 | 126.0 | +1.97 | -1.02 | 1.023 | 50.6% | -76 | +146 | +147 | 51.0% | +0.43 | 2–6 (25%) | 2–5 (29%) | — | +0.35 |
| 28 | 1988 | 1808 | 143.7 | — | — | — | — | -7 | +174 | — | 59.9% | +0.53 | 14–6 (70%) | 13–4 (76%) | — | +0.08 | 1992 | 1821 | 151.3 | +3.52 | +2.24 | 1.171 | 52.9% | -59 | -12 | +50 | 58.9% | +0.86 | 6–5 (55%) | 9–7 (56%) | — | -1.65 |
| 29 | 1989 | 1869 | 146.8 | — | — | — | — | -39 | +112 | — | 60.4% | +0.46 | 9–7 (56%) | 13–12 (52%) | — | -1.82 | 1993 | 1841 | 136.9 | +1.37 | -0.47 | 0.935 | 48.7% | -131 | -60 | +120 | 51.5% | +0.06 | 7–4 (64%) | 5–3 (63%) | — | -3.12 |
| 30 | 1990 | 1719 | 152.3 | — | — | — | — | -59 | +350 | — | 56.2% | +0.37 | 14–14 (50%) | 22–13 (63%) | — | +1.72 | 1994 | 1742 | 142.8 | +1.00 | +2.00 | 1.059 | 51.0% | -13 | -31 | +182 | 54.1% | +0.50 | 5–7 (42%) | 6–5 (55%) | — | -1.94 |
| 31 | 1991 | 1720 | 132.4 | +1.72 | -0.14 | 1.075 | 51.3% | -41 | +210 | — | 52.1% | +0.27 | 8–8 (50%) | 6–5 (55%) | — | +1.82 | 1995 | 1636 | 122.3 | -2.33 | -1.40 | 0.837 | 46.9% | +104 | +2 | +161 | 38.5% | -0.85 | 3–6 (33%) | 4–2 (67%) | — | -1.19 |
| 32 | 1992 | 1676 | 124.1 | +0.46 | -0.28 | 0.968 | 49.8% | -20 | +116 | — | 50.0% | +0.13 | 3–3 (50%) | 3–5 (38%) | — | -0.39 | 1996 | 1561 | 92.6 | -3.49 | -2.03 | 0.714 | 43.1% | — | — | — | 10.0% | -3.10 | 0–1 | 1–0 | — | +0.47 |
| 33 | 1993 | 1607 | 107.6 | -1.77 | +0.32 | 0.915 | 48.6% | — | +122 | — | 38.1% | -0.95 | 1–4 (20%) | 4–1 (80%) | — | +0.27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 2094 | 156.6 | +0.93 | -0.14 | 1.018 | 50.5% | -35 | +90 | -295 | 61.4% | +0.71 | 154–97 (61%) | 181–105 (63%) | 109.8 | -1.07 | — | 2064 | 155.4 | +1.09 | +0.45 | 1.001 | 50.0% | -27 | +11 | +40 | 58.0% | +0.61 | 103–86 (54%) | 107–100 (52%) | 101.5 | -3.37 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ivan Lendl | 2 | 16 | 18 | Nov 12, 1990 | H2H |
| Diego Perez | 9 | 4 | 13 | May 4, 1990 | H2H |
| Aaron Krickstein | 8 | 3 | 11 | Dec 15, 1990 | H2H |
| Jimmy Connors | 1 | 10 | 11 | Sep 3, 1989 | H2H |
| Jose Luis Clerc | 3 | 8 | 11 | May 31, 1989 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Boris Becker | 3 | 10 | 13 | Feb 10, 1995 | H2H |
| Ivan Lendl | 3 | 9 | 12 | Sep 30, 1989 | H2H |
| Mats Wilander | 1 | 9 | 10 | Nov 30, 1988 | H2H |
| Thomas Muster | 4 | 4 | 8 | Mar 31, 1994 | H2H |
| Andrei Chesnokov | 8 | 0 | 8 | Apr 19, 1991 | H2H |