Andres Gomez
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ivan Lendl | 2 | 16 | 18 | Nov 12, 1990 | H2H |
| Diego Perez | 9 | 4 | 13 | May 4, 1990 | H2H |
| Aaron Krickstein | 8 | 3 | 11 | Dec 15, 1990 | H2H |
| Jimmy Connors | 1 | 10 | 11 | Sep 3, 1989 | H2H |
| Jose Luis Clerc | 3 | 8 | 11 | May 31, 1989 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-03 00:00 UTC
Andres Gomez holds a 3–0 lead over Jaime Fillol in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Andres Gomez leads 3–0 on clay. Most recently, Andres Gomez won the 1981 Santiago round of 32 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andres Gomez | 6-2 6-3 | Jaime Fillol | Match data | Nov 26, 1981* | R32 | Santiago | ATP 250 | Clay |
| Andres Gomez | 3-6 6-0 6-2 | Jaime Fillol | Match data | Oct 4, 1981* | QF | Madrid | ATP 250 | Clay |
| Andres Gomez | 3-6 6-3 6-2 | Jaime Fillol | Match data | Nov 27, 1980* | R32 | Santiago | ATP 250 | Clay |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andres Gomez | #1,171 | #4 | 2,005 | 2,094 | 502 | 261 | 65.8% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 17 | 21 |
| Jaime Fillol | #794 | #14 | — | 2,063 | 534 | 364 | 59.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 8 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Andres Gomez | Jaime Fillol | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 1979 | 11–8 | 57.9% | #61 | 1,639 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1980 | 36–23 | 61.0% | #42 | 1,802 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1981 | 36–21 | 63.2% | #37 | 1,901 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1982 | 51–25 | 67.1% | #15 | 1,887 | 0 | 3 | 1968 | 26–9 | 74.3% | — | 1,645 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1983 | 43–20 | 68.3% | #14 | 1,960 | 0 | 4 | 1969 | 27–19 | 58.7% | — | 1,666 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1984 | 60–13 | 82.2% | #5 | 2,074 | 0 | 9 | 1970 | 32–23 | 58.2% | — | 1,751 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1985 | 26–14 | 65.0% | #15 | 1,971 | 0 | 10 | 1971 | 43–21 | 67.2% | — | 1,774 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 1986 | 57–20 | 74.0% | #10 | 1,898 | 0 | 14 | 1972 | 44–32 | 57.9% | — | 1,744 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 1987 | 46–18 | 71.9% | #11 | 1,913 | 0 | 15 | 1973 | 51–33 | 60.7% | #17 | 1,872 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | 1988 | 34–18 | 65.4% | #24 | 1,808 | 0 | 15 | 1974 | 46–31 | 59.7% | #31 | 1,833 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | 1989 | 32–17 | 65.3% | #17 | 1,869 | 0 | 17 | 1975 | 60–26 | 69.8% | #16 | 1,975 | 0 | 5 |
| 30 | 1990 | 38–27 | 58.5% | #6 | 1,719 | 1 | 20 | 1976 | 50–28 | 64.1% | #24 | 1,971 | 0 | 6 |
| 31 | 1991 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #70 | 1,720 | 1 | 21 | 1977 | 46–22 | 67.6% | #24 | 1,901 | 0 | 6 |
| 32 | 1992 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #179 | 1,675 | 1 | 21 | 1978 | 32–27 | 54.2% | #77 | 1,762 | 0 | 6 |
| 33 | 1993 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #402 | 1,606 | 1 | 21 | 1979 | 21–28 | 42.9% | #124 | 1,736 | 0 | 6 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 10–22 | 31.2% | #86 | 1,644 | 0 | 6 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 18–19 | 48.6% | #95 | 1,657 | 0 | 7 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 14–8 | 63.6% | #77 | 1,708 | 0 | 8 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #85 | 1,651 | 0 | 8 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Andres Gomez | Jaime Fillol | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 19 | 1979 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 10 | 7 | 17 | 58.8% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1980 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 30 | 17 | 47 | 63.8% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1981 | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 32 | 16 | 48 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1982 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 38 | 16 | 54 | 70.4% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 10 | 6 | 16 | 62.5% | 1968 | — | — | — | — | 14 | 3 | 17 | 82.4% | 10 | 5 | 15 | 66.7% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% |
| 23 | 1983 | 16 | 6 | 22 | 72.7% | 21 | 10 | 31 | 67.7% | — | — | — | — | 6 | 4 | 10 | 60.0% | 1969 | 7 | 5 | 12 | 58.3% | 13 | 6 | 19 | 68.4% | 7 | 7 | 14 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 24 | 1984 | 11 | 3 | 14 | 78.6% | 35 | 5 | 40 | 87.5% | 4 | 1 | 5 | 80.0% | 10 | 4 | 14 | 71.4% | 1970 | 12 | 9 | 21 | 57.1% | 12 | 5 | 17 | 70.6% | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% |
| 25 | 1985 | 11 | 3 | 14 | 78.6% | 8 | 6 | 14 | 57.1% | — | — | — | — | 7 | 5 | 12 | 58.3% | 1971 | 21 | 8 | 29 | 72.4% | 10 | 6 | 16 | 62.5% | 8 | 4 | 12 | 66.7% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% |
| 26 | 1986 | 18 | 5 | 23 | 78.3% | 34 | 9 | 43 | 79.1% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 1972 | 17 | 11 | 28 | 60.7% | 13 | 9 | 22 | 59.1% | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | 9 | 8 | 17 | 52.9% |
| 27 | 1987 | 15 | 6 | 21 | 71.4% | 23 | 8 | 31 | 74.2% | 3 | 1 | 4 | 75.0% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | 1973 | 17 | 14 | 31 | 54.8% | 25 | 10 | 35 | 71.4% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 8 | 8 | 16 | 50.0% |
| 28 | 1988 | 17 | 9 | 26 | 65.4% | 15 | 6 | 21 | 71.4% | — | — | — | — | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 1974 | 11 | 8 | 19 | 57.9% | 26 | 15 | 41 | 63.4% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% |
| 29 | 1989 | 12 | 7 | 19 | 63.2% | 18 | 8 | 26 | 69.2% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1975 | 9 | 7 | 16 | 56.3% | 41 | 13 | 54 | 75.9% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 8 | 4 | 12 | 66.7% |
| 30 | 1990 | 10 | 10 | 20 | 50.0% | 24 | 6 | 30 | 80.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 4 | 10 | 14 | 28.6% | 1976 | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | 34 | 16 | 50 | 68.0% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 8 | 7 | 15 | 53.3% |
| 31 | 1991 | 8 | 10 | 18 | 44.4% | 6 | 8 | 14 | 42.9% | — | — | — | — | 6 | 1 | 7 | 85.7% | 1977 | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 34 | 13 | 47 | 72.3% | 5 | 2 | 7 | 71.4% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% |
| 32 | 1992 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 8 | 9 | 17 | 47.1% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 21 | 15 | 36 | 58.3% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% |
| 33 | 1993 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 7 | 9 | 16 | 43.8% | 11 | 10 | 21 | 52.4% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 5 | 10 | 15 | 33.3% | 2 | 8 | 10 | 20.0% | — | — | — | — | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 16 | 14 | 30 | 53.3% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 5 | 1 | 6 | 83.3% |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 5 | 8 | 13 | 38.5% | 9 | 6 | 15 | 60.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 130 | 72 | 202 | 64.4% | 304 | 135 | 439 | 69.2% | 10 | 8 | 18 | 55.6% | 58 | 46 | 104 | 55.8% | — | 130 | 104 | 234 | 55.6% | 285 | 153 | 438 | 65.1% | 56 | 45 | 101 | 55.4% | 63 | 62 | 125 | 50.4% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Andres Gomez | Jaime Fillol | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 19 | 1979 | 1640 | 133.9 | — | — | — | — | — | +23 | — | 53.3% | +0.13 | 5–1 (83%) | 6–1 (86%) | — | +0.20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1980 | 1803 | 150.2 | — | — | — | — | -218 | +37 | -239 | 56.6% | +0.51 | 9–5 (64%) | 7–5 (58%) | — | -1.09 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1981 | 1902 | 159.2 | — | — | — | — | -233 | +53 | — | 61.4% | +0.73 | 11–11 (50%) | 14–9 (61%) | — | -2.54 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1982 | 1887 | 151.8 | — | — | — | — | -96 | +44 | — | 60.2% | +0.59 | 18–10 (64%) | 12–9 (57%) | — | -1.90 | 1968 | 1645 | 119.6 | — | — | — | — | -75 | +81 | -43 | 67.7% | +1.18 | 9–4 (69%) | — | — | +1.11 |
| 23 | 1983 | 1961 | 152.2 | — | — | — | — | -52 | +15 | — | 66.2% | +0.91 | 8–8 (50%) | 13–6 (68%) | — | -1.48 | 1969 | 1667 | 119.9 | — | — | — | — | +17 | +50 | -33 | 55.4% | +0.51 | 8–8 (50%) | — | — | +1.81 |
| 24 | 1984 | 2075 | 162.7 | — | — | — | — | -57 | +57 | -408 | 74.2% | +1.57 | 14–6 (70%) | 28–8 (78%) | — | -0.36 | 1970 | 1752 | 130.4 | — | — | — | — | +6 | +20 | -71 | 53.1% | +0.21 | 12–5 (71%) | 4–5 (44%) | — | -0.35 |
| 25 | 1985 | 1972 | 156.7 | — | — | — | — | +24 | +63 | — | 59.6% | +0.84 | 8–6 (57%) | 6–3 (67%) | — | -2.07 | 1971 | 1774 | 132.9 | — | — | — | — | +93 | -19 | -22 | 59.9% | +0.74 | 16–10 (62%) | 4–6 (40%) | — | +2.68 |
| 26 | 1986 | 1899 | 151.6 | — | — | — | — | +57 | +84 | — | 65.3% | +0.96 | 19–3 (86%) | 15–13 (54%) | — | +0.32 | 1972 | 1744 | 130.3 | — | — | — | — | +53 | +10 | +38 | 58.2% | +0.57 | 7–15 (32%) | 15–14 (52%) | — | +7.01 |
| 27 | 1987 | 1914 | 153.2 | — | — | — | — | +9 | +79 | -210 | 65.7% | +0.91 | 13–5 (72%) | 19–11 (63%) | — | -0.88 | 1973 | 1873 | 139.9 | — | — | — | — | -33 | +32 | — | 59.6% | +0.60 | 15–12 (56%) | 17–17 (50%) | — | -0.71 |
| 28 | 1988 | 1808 | 143.7 | — | — | — | — | -7 | +174 | — | 59.9% | +0.53 | 14–6 (70%) | 13–4 (76%) | — | +0.08 | 1974 | 1833 | 145.7 | — | — | — | — | -2 | +31 | 0 | 56.6% | +0.59 | 16–12 (57%) | 6–12 (33%) | — | -4.09 |
| 29 | 1989 | 1869 | 146.8 | — | — | — | — | -39 | +112 | — | 60.4% | +0.46 | 9–7 (56%) | 13–12 (52%) | — | -1.82 | 1975 | 1975 | 157.8 | — | — | — | — | -83 | +56 | -137 | 63.3% | +0.92 | 17–9 (65%) | 11–10 (52%) | — | -5.98 |
| 30 | 1990 | 1719 | 152.3 | — | — | — | — | -59 | +350 | — | 56.2% | +0.37 | 14–14 (50%) | 22–13 (63%) | — | +1.72 | 1976 | 1972 | 157.9 | — | — | — | — | -26 | +33 | -116 | 58.9% | +0.79 | 22–7 (76%) | 7–17 (29%) | — | -4.07 |
| 31 | 1991 | 1720 | 132.4 | +1.72 | -0.14 | 1.075 | 51.3% | -41 | +210 | — | 52.1% | +0.27 | 8–8 (50%) | 6–5 (55%) | — | +1.82 | 1977 | 1902 | 145.9 | — | — | — | — | -65 | +78 | -56 | 61.2% | +0.52 | 14–3 (82%) | 11–5 (69%) | — | +0.66 |
| 32 | 1992 | 1676 | 124.1 | +0.46 | -0.28 | 0.968 | 49.8% | -20 | +116 | — | 50.0% | +0.13 | 3–3 (50%) | 3–5 (38%) | — | -0.39 | 1978 | 1763 | 140.0 | — | — | — | — | -7 | +59 | +95 | 54.2% | +0.18 | 11–14 (44%) | 8–5 (62%) | — | -4.40 |
| 33 | 1993 | 1607 | 107.6 | -1.77 | +0.32 | 0.915 | 48.6% | — | +122 | — | 38.1% | -0.95 | 1–4 (20%) | 4–1 (80%) | — | +0.27 | 1979 | 1737 | 136.4 | — | — | — | — | -7 | +55 | +28 | 42.4% | -0.36 | 11–7 (61%) | 5–7 (42%) | — | -2.01 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 1644 | 125.6 | — | — | — | — | +4 | +66 | — | 34.2% | -1.03 | 7–6 (54%) | 4–10 (29%) | — | -0.58 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 1657 | 140.6 | — | — | — | — | -45 | +98 | — | 48.4% | -0.06 | 6–6 (50%) | 6–5 (55%) | — | +0.31 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 1709 | 120.8 | — | — | — | — | +30 | +2 | — | 56.1% | +0.35 | 5–1 (83%) | 6–7 (46%) | — | +3.91 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 1651 | 131.3 | — | — | — | — | +1 | +102 | — | 48.1% | +0.08 | 4–5 (44%) | 3–5 (38%) | — | +0.24 |
| Career | — | 2094 | 156.6 | +0.93 | -0.14 | 1.018 | 50.5% | -35 | +90 | -295 | 61.4% | +0.71 | 154–97 (61%) | 181–105 (63%) | 109.8 | -1.07 | — | 2064 | 144.5 | — | — | — | — | +1 | +50 | -25 | 56.2% | +0.46 | 180–124 (59%) | 107–125 (46%) | 98.7 | -0.50 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ivan Lendl | 2 | 16 | 18 | Nov 12, 1990 | H2H |
| Diego Perez | 9 | 4 | 13 | May 4, 1990 | H2H |
| Aaron Krickstein | 8 | 3 | 11 | Dec 15, 1990 | H2H |
| Jimmy Connors | 1 | 10 | 11 | Sep 3, 1989 | H2H |
| Jose Luis Clerc | 3 | 8 | 11 | May 31, 1989 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raymond Moore | 9 | 7 | 16 | Oct 3, 1981 | H2H |
| Guillermo Vilas | 2 | 13 | 15 | Apr 10, 1981 | H2H |
| Stan Smith | 3 | 12 | 15 | Jun 11, 1977 | H2H |
| Manuel Orantes | 5 | 9 | 14 | Jan 29, 1982 | H2H |
| Andrew Pattison | 7 | 6 | 13 | Jul 9, 1981 | — |