H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Andres Gomez vs Jaime Fillol H2H: 3-0
Andres Gomez holds a 3–0 lead over Jaime Fillol in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Andres Gomez leads 3–0 on clay. Most recently, Andres Gomez won the 1981 Santiago third round 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ECU
Age 66
Left-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
3
–
0
3 main draw meetings
CHI
Age 80
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 23, 1981 | Santiago | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Andres Gomez | 6-2 6-3 | Jaime Fillol | Match data |
| Oct 4, 1981* | Madrid | ATP 250 | QF | Clay | Andres Gomez | 3-6 6-0 6-2 | Jaime Fillol | Match data |
| Nov 27, 1980* | Santiago | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Andres Gomez | 3-6 6-3 6-2 | Jaime Fillol | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andres Gomez | #1,171 | #4 | 2,005 | 2,092 | 502 | 261 | 65.8% | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 18 | 21 |
| Jaime Fillol | #1,171 | #14 | 8 | 2,041 | 532 | 367 | 59.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 7 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Andres Gomez | Jaime Fillol | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 1979 | 11–8 | 57.9% | #61 | 1,638 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1980 | 36–23 | 61.0% | #42 | 1,800 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1981 | 36–21 | 63.2% | #37 | 1,899 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1982 | 51–25 | 67.1% | #15 | 1,885 | 0 | 3 | 1968 | 30–10 | 75.0% | — | 1,658 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1983 | 43–20 | 68.3% | #14 | 1,959 | 0 | 4 | 1969 | 27–19 | 58.7% | — | 1,673 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1984 | 60–13 | 82.2% | #5 | 2,072 | 0 | 9 | 1970 | 32–23 | 58.2% | — | 1,749 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1985 | 26–14 | 65.0% | #15 | 1,970 | 0 | 10 | 1971 | 43–21 | 67.2% | — | 1,774 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 1986 | 57–20 | 74.0% | #10 | 1,898 | 0 | 14 | 1972 | 44–32 | 57.9% | — | 1,745 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 1987 | 46–18 | 71.9% | #11 | 1,913 | 0 | 15 | 1973 | 51–33 | 60.7% | #17 | 1,867 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | 1988 | 34–18 | 65.4% | #24 | 1,808 | 0 | 15 | 1974 | 48–32 | 60.0% | #31 | 1,830 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | 1989 | 32–17 | 65.3% | #17 | 1,868 | 0 | 17 | 1975 | 56–27 | 67.5% | #16 | 1,962 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | 1990 | 38–27 | 58.5% | #6 | 1,726 | 1 | 20 | 1976 | 47–27 | 63.5% | #24 | 1,928 | 0 | 5 |
| 31 | 1991 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #70 | 1,722 | 1 | 21 | 1977 | 44–21 | 67.7% | #24 | 1,894 | 0 | 5 |
| 32 | 1992 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #179 | 1,676 | 1 | 21 | 1978 | 33–29 | 53.2% | #77 | 1,756 | 0 | 5 |
| 33 | 1993 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #402 | 1,606 | 1 | 21 | 1979 | 21–28 | 42.9% | #124 | 1,736 | 0 | 5 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 10–22 | 31.2% | #86 | 1,644 | 0 | 5 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 18–19 | 48.6% | #95 | 1,654 | 0 | 6 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 14–8 | 63.6% | #77 | 1,707 | 0 | 7 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #85 | 1,649 | 0 | 7 |