H2H data updated: 2026-09-03 00:00 UTC

Andres Gomez vs Jim Pugh H2H: 2-0

Andres Gomez holds a 2–0 lead over Jim Pugh in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Andres Gomez leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Andres Gomez won the 1988 Italian Open round of 16 4-6 6-3 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Andres Gomez
ECU Age 66 Left-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main draw meetings
Jim Pugh
USA Age 62 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Andres Gomez #19 4-6 6-3 7-5 Jim Pugh #51 Match data May 14, 1988* R16 Italian Open ATP 500 Clay
Andres Gomez #12 6-3 6-3 Jim Pugh #49 Match data Nov 15, 1987* SF Frankfurt ATP 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Andres Gomez #1,171 #4 2,005 2,094 502 261 65.8% 1 0 0 3 17 21
Jim Pugh #1,147 #37 423 1,833 85 95 47.2% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Andres Gomez Jim Pugh
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 1979 11–8 57.9% #61 1,639 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1980 36–23 61.0% #42 1,802 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 1981 36–21 63.2% #37 1,901 0 1 — — — — — — —
22 1982 51–25 67.1% #15 1,887 0 3 1986 0–4 0.0% #99 1,462 0 0
23 1983 43–20 68.3% #14 1,960 0 4 1987 24–20 54.5% #45 1,701 0 0
24 1984 60–13 82.2% #5 2,074 0 9 1988 27–27 50.0% #63 1,707 0 0
25 1985 26–14 65.0% #15 1,971 0 10 1989 20–18 52.6% #60 1,731 0 1
26 1986 57–20 74.0% #10 1,898 0 14 1990 13–15 46.4% #121 1,726 0 1
27 1987 46–18 71.9% #11 1,913 0 15 1991 1–8 11.1% #397 1,595 0 1
28 1988 34–18 65.4% #24 1,808 0 15 1992 0–1 0.0% #1074 1,588 0 1
29 1989 32–17 65.3% #17 1,869 0 17 — — — — — — —
30 1990 38–27 58.5% #6 1,719 1 20 — — — — — — —
31 1991 20–19 51.3% #70 1,720 1 21 1995 0–2 0.0% #273 1,567 0 1
32 1992 10–12 45.5% #179 1,675 1 21 — — — — — — —
33 1993 2–6 25.0% #402 1,606 1 21 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Andres Gomez Jim Pugh
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
19 1979 1 1 2 50.0% 10 7 17 58.8% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1980 2 2 4 50.0% 30 17 47 63.8% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1981 4 3 7 57.1% 32 16 48 66.7% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1982 3 2 5 60.0% 38 16 54 70.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 1986 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
23 1983 16 6 22 72.7% 21 10 31 67.7% — — — — 6 4 10 60.0% 1987 13 12 25 52.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 7 2 9 77.8%
24 1984 11 3 14 78.6% 35 5 40 87.5% 4 1 5 80.0% 10 4 14 71.4% 1988 17 14 31 54.8% 5 7 12 41.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 5 10 50.0%
25 1985 11 3 14 78.6% 8 6 14 57.1% — — — — 7 5 12 58.3% 1989 10 11 21 47.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 7 1 8 87.5% 2 4 6 33.3%
26 1986 18 5 23 78.3% 34 9 43 79.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 1990 7 7 14 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
27 1987 15 6 21 71.4% 23 8 31 74.2% 3 1 4 75.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 1991 1 5 6 16.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
28 1988 17 9 26 65.4% 15 6 21 71.4% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% 1992 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
29 1989 12 7 19 63.2% 18 8 26 69.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1990 10 10 20 50.0% 24 6 30 80.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 10 14 28.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1991 8 10 18 44.4% 6 8 14 42.9% — — — — 6 1 7 85.7% 1995 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1992 2 3 5 40.0% 8 9 17 47.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1993 0 2 2 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 130 72 202 64.4% 304 135 439 69.2% 10 8 18 55.6% 58 46 104 55.8% — 48 54 102 47.1% 12 19 31 38.7% 10 8 18 55.6% 15 14 29 51.7%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 66/69 of Andres Gomez's and 12/12 of Jim Pugh's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Andres Gomez Jim Pugh
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
27 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1991 9/9 4.3 4.9 60.8% 63.4% 38.7% 53.1% 53.9% 53.6% 37.0%
28 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1992 1/1 5.0 5.0 55.1% 63.0% 31.8% 16.7% 16.7% 49.0% 37.7%
31 1991 37/39 5.7 2.9 56.6% 73.4% 50.8% 57.1% 46.8% 63.5% 39.3% 1995 2/2 3.0 3.0 49.3% 54.2% 40.8% 50.9% 57.1% 46.3% 29.6%
32 1992 22/22 5.8 3.9 54.4% 71.8% 47.2% 64.5% 40.1% 60.5% 38.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 1993 7/8 5.4 3.7 58.5% 63.7% 44.0% 57.7% 45.5% 55.5% 40.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 66/763 5.7 3.3 56.1% 71.8% 48.9% 59.6% 44.4% 61.6% 39.1% — 12/180 4.2 4.6 58.4% 61.8% 38.5% 49.7% 51.4% 52.0% 35.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Andres Gomez Jim Pugh
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
19 1979 1640 133.9 — — — — — +23 — 53.3% +0.13 5–1 (83%) 6–1 (86%) — +0.20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1980 1803 150.2 — — — — -218 +37 -239 56.6% +0.51 9–5 (64%) 7–5 (58%) — -1.09 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1981 1902 159.2 — — — — -233 +53 — 61.4% +0.73 11–11 (50%) 14–9 (61%) — -2.54 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1982 1887 151.8 — — — — -96 +44 — 60.2% +0.59 18–10 (64%) 12–9 (57%) — -1.90 1986 1462 101.4 — — — — +25 — — 0.0% -2.89 — — — +0.05
23 1983 1961 152.2 — — — — -52 +15 — 66.2% +0.91 8–8 (50%) 13–6 (68%) — -1.48 1987 1701 136.3 — — — — +18 -144 — 51.4% +0.20 9–3 (75%) 8–14 (36%) — +3.27
24 1984 2075 162.7 — — — — -57 +57 -408 74.2% +1.57 14–6 (70%) 28–8 (78%) — -0.36 1988 1708 139.3 — — — — +24 -112 — 50.3% +0.02 12–13 (48%) 7–6 (54%) — -0.43
25 1985 1972 156.7 — — — — +24 +63 — 59.6% +0.84 8–6 (57%) 6–3 (67%) — -2.07 1989 1732 141.9 — — — — -49 -149 -26 51.0% +0.14 7–6 (54%) 9–7 (56%) — -2.70
26 1986 1899 151.6 — — — — +57 +84 — 65.3% +0.96 19–3 (86%) 15–13 (54%) — +0.32 1990 1726 132.0 — — — — +1 -124 -21 42.3% -0.53 9–8 (53%) 6–6 (50%) — -1.56
27 1987 1914 153.2 — — — — +9 +79 -210 65.7% +0.91 13–5 (72%) 19–11 (63%) — -0.88 1991 1596 111.1 -2.71 -1.12 0.798 45.7% +47 — — 31.0% -1.38 1–4 (20%) 2–1 (67%) — -0.46
28 1988 1808 143.7 — — — — -7 +174 — 59.9% +0.53 14–6 (70%) 13–4 (76%) — +0.08 1992 1589 102.9 -2.68 +1.75 0.739 42.7% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.20
29 1989 1869 146.8 — — — — -39 +112 — 60.4% +0.46 9–7 (56%) 13–12 (52%) — -1.82 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1990 1719 152.3 — — — — -59 +350 — 56.2% +0.37 14–14 (50%) 22–13 (63%) — +1.72 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1991 1720 132.4 +1.72 -0.14 1.075 51.3% -41 +210 — 52.1% +0.27 8–8 (50%) 6–5 (55%) — +1.82 1995 1567 103.4 -2.59 -0.14 0.551 37.9% — — — 20.0% -2.20 0–1 1–2 (33%) — -0.20
32 1992 1676 124.1 +0.46 -0.28 0.968 49.8% -20 +116 — 50.0% +0.13 3–3 (50%) 3–5 (38%) — -0.39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1993 1607 107.6 -1.77 +0.32 0.915 48.6% — +122 — 38.1% -0.95 1–4 (20%) 4–1 (80%) — +0.27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2094 156.6 +0.93 -0.14 1.018 50.5% -35 +90 -295 61.4% +0.71 154–97 (61%) 181–105 (63%) 109.8 -1.07 — 1833 139.8 -2.69 -0.72 0.747 44.1% +5 -128 -24 46.8% -0.18 38–35 (52%) 33–36 (48%) 101.3 -1.24

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.