H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Andres Gomez vs John Fitzgerald H2H: 1-2

John Fitzgerald holds a 2–1 lead over Andres Gomez in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on carpet, while John Fitzgerald leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, John Fitzgerald won the 1988 Tokyo Indoor quarterfinal 6-3 3-6 7-5.

ECU Age 66 Left-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
1 2
3 main draw meetings
AUS Age 65 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 23, 1988* Tokyo Indoor ATP 250 QF Carpet John Fitzgerald #32 6-3 3-6 7-5 Andres Gomez #22 Match data
Jun 25, 1986* Wimbledon Grand Slam R128 Grass John Fitzgerald #146 6-1 3-6 7-6 6-4 Andres Gomez #11 Match data
Apr 5, 1985* Chicago ATP 250 R16 Carpet Andres Gomez #5 3-6 7-6 6-4 John Fitzgerald #52 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Andres Gomez #1,171 #4 2,005 2,092 502 261 65.8% 1 2 0 0 18 21
John Fitzgerald #765 #25 321 1,857 230 221 51.0% 0 0 0 0 6 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Andres Gomez John Fitzgerald
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1979 1–4 20.0% #305 1,470 0 0
19 1979 11–8 57.9% #61 1,638 0 0 1980 4–8 33.3% #136 1,522 0 0
20 1980 36–23 61.0% #42 1,800 0 0 1981 26–24 52.0% #60 1,674 0 1
21 1981 36–21 63.2% #37 1,899 0 1 1982 22–22 50.0% #78 1,696 0 2
22 1982 51–25 67.1% #15 1,885 0 3 1983 32–19 62.7% #43 1,790 0 4
23 1983 43–20 68.3% #14 1,959 0 4 1984 27–19 58.7% #37 1,786 0 5
24 1984 60–13 82.2% #5 2,072 0 9 1985 16–21 43.2% #91 1,665 0 5
25 1985 26–14 65.0% #15 1,970 0 10 1986 8–11 42.1% #102 1,654 0 5
26 1986 57–20 74.0% #10 1,898 0 14 1987 18–18 50.0% #73 1,679 0 5
27 1987 46–18 71.9% #11 1,913 0 15 1988 36–19 65.5% #25 1,778 0 6
28 1988 34–18 65.4% #24 1,808 0 15 1989 15–18 45.5% #117 1,651 0 6
29 1989 32–17 65.3% #17 1,868 0 17 1990 6–13 31.6% #188 1,587 0 6
30 1990 38–27 58.5% #6 1,726 1 20 1991 5–7 41.7% #205 1,610 0 6
31 1991 20–19 51.3% #70 1,722 1 21 1992 10–11 47.6% #166 1,618 0 6
32 1992 10–12 45.5% #179 1,676 1 21 1993 4–5 44.4% #298 1,582 0 6
33 1993 2–6 25.0% #402 1,606 1 21 1994 0–1 0.0% #792 1,575 0 6
34 1995 0–1 0.0% #765 1,570 0 6