H2H data updated: 2026-09-05 00:00 UTC

Andres Gomez vs Kevin Curren H2H: 2-1

Andres Gomez holds a 2–1 lead over Kevin Curren in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Andres Gomez leads 2–0 on carpet, while Kevin Curren leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Andres Gomez won the 1990 Philadelphia round of 16 6-7 6-3 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Andres Gomez
ECU Age 66 Left-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main-draw meetings
Kevin Curren
USA Age 68 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Andres Gomez #18 6-7 6-3 6-4 Kevin Curren #22 Match data Feb 23, 1990* R16 Philadelphia ATP Championship Series → modern equivalent ATP 500 Carpet
Kevin Curren #38 3-6 6-3 6-4 Andres Gomez #9 Match data Feb 20, 1988* QF Memphis ATP 250 Hard
Andres Gomez #11 6-7 7-6 6-7 6-4 6-2 Kevin Curren #23 Match data Apr 12, 1987* QF Dallas Wct ATP 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Andres Gomez #1,171 #4 2,005 2,094 502 261 65.8% 1 0 0 3 17 21
Kevin Curren #1,179 #5 684 2,088 339 238 58.8% 0 0 0 0 5 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Andres Gomez Kevin Curren
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 1979 11–8 57.9% #61 1,639 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1980 36–23 61.0% #42 1,802 0 0 1978 1–2 33.3% #91 1,510 0 0
21 1981 36–21 63.2% #37 1,901 0 1 1979 7–14 33.3% #197 1,550 0 0
22 1982 51–25 67.1% #15 1,887 0 3 1980 16–13 55.2% #55 1,770 0 0
23 1983 43–20 68.3% #14 1,960 0 4 1981 23–18 56.1% #50 1,768 0 1
24 1984 60–13 82.2% #5 2,074 0 9 1982 33–17 66.0% #17 1,944 0 2
25 1985 26–14 65.0% #15 1,971 0 10 1983 32–20 61.5% #9 1,932 0 2
26 1986 57–20 74.0% #10 1,898 0 14 1984 32–17 65.3% #15 1,958 0 2
27 1987 46–18 71.9% #11 1,913 0 15 1985 25–13 65.8% #10 1,917 0 3
28 1988 34–18 65.4% #24 1,808 0 15 1986 35–17 67.3% #18 1,892 0 4
29 1989 32–17 65.3% #17 1,869 0 17 1987 21–17 55.3% #37 1,808 0 4
30 1990 38–27 58.5% #6 1,719 1 20 1988 31–15 67.4% #23 1,812 0 4
31 1991 20–19 51.3% #70 1,720 1 21 1989 33–18 64.7% #20 1,830 0 5
32 1992 10–12 45.5% #179 1,675 1 21 1990 20–19 51.3% #71 1,798 0 5
33 1993 2–6 25.0% #402 1,606 1 21 1991 18–20 47.4% #58 1,701 0 5
34 — — — — — — — 1992 12–17 41.4% #147 1,659 0 5
35 — — — — — — — 1993 0–1 0.0% #1178 1,637 0 5

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Andres Gomez Kevin Curren
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
19 1979 1 1 2 50.0% 10 7 17 58.8% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1980 2 2 4 50.0% 30 17 47 63.8% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1978 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1981 4 3 7 57.1% 32 16 48 66.7% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 1979 4 10 14 28.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
22 1982 3 2 5 60.0% 38 16 54 70.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 1980 9 6 15 60.0% — — — — 7 4 11 63.6% 0 3 3 0.0%
23 1983 16 6 22 72.7% 21 10 31 67.7% — — — — 6 4 10 60.0% 1981 13 8 21 61.9% 2 2 4 50.0% 8 5 13 61.5% 0 3 3 0.0%
24 1984 11 3 14 78.6% 35 5 40 87.5% 4 1 5 80.0% 10 4 14 71.4% 1982 8 3 11 72.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 6 2 8 75.0% 19 11 30 63.3%
25 1985 11 3 14 78.6% 8 6 14 57.1% — — — — 7 5 12 58.3% 1983 7 5 12 58.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 9 2 11 81.8% 15 10 25 60.0%
26 1986 18 5 23 78.3% 34 9 43 79.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 1984 5 2 7 71.4% 1 1 2 50.0% 13 4 17 76.5% 13 10 23 56.5%
27 1987 15 6 21 71.4% 23 8 31 74.2% 3 1 4 75.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 1985 3 6 9 33.3% — — — — 8 2 10 80.0% 14 5 19 73.7%
28 1988 17 9 26 65.4% 15 6 21 71.4% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% 1986 16 8 24 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 17 6 23 73.9%
29 1989 12 7 19 63.2% 18 8 26 69.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1987 14 9 23 60.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 4 7 42.9%
30 1990 10 10 20 50.0% 24 6 30 80.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 10 14 28.6% 1988 21 9 30 70.0% — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% 7 4 11 63.6%
31 1991 8 10 18 44.4% 6 8 14 42.9% — — — — 6 1 7 85.7% 1989 19 10 29 65.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 10 5 15 66.7%
32 1992 2 3 5 40.0% 8 9 17 47.1% — — — — — — — — 1990 8 8 16 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 5 2 7 71.4% 6 7 13 46.2%
33 1993 0 2 2 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — 1991 7 11 18 38.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 9 6 15 60.0%
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 10 12 22 45.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 130 72 202 64.4% 304 135 439 69.2% 10 8 18 55.6% 58 46 104 55.8% — 145 110 255 56.9% 8 16 24 33.3% 71 36 107 66.4% 115 76 191 60.2%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 66/69 of Andres Gomez's and 58/68 of Kevin Curren's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Andres Gomez Kevin Curren
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
31 1991 37/39 5.7 2.9 56.6% 73.4% 50.8% 57.1% 46.8% 63.5% 39.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 1992 22/22 5.8 3.9 54.4% 71.8% 47.2% 64.5% 40.1% 60.5% 38.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 1993 7/8 5.4 3.7 58.5% 63.7% 44.0% 57.7% 45.5% 55.5% 40.7% 1991 34/38 8.3 3.7 50.9% 76.6% 48.5% 59.4% 44.0% 62.8% 36.6%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1992 23/29 6.5 3.3 47.3% 73.7% 50.8% 55.7% 35.8% 61.7% 35.4%
35 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1993 1/1 4.0 4.0 41.7% 66.7% 14.3% 16.7% 50.0% 36.1% 32.0%
Career — 66/763 5.7 3.3 56.1% 71.8% 48.9% 59.6% 44.4% 61.6% 39.1% — 58/577 7.5 3.5 49.3% 75.3% 48.8% 57.2% 40.8% 61.9% 36.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Andres Gomez Kevin Curren
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
19 1979 1640 133.9 — — — — — +23 — 53.3% +0.13 5–1 (83%) 6–1 (86%) 109.8 +0.20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1980 1803 150.2 — — — — -218 +37 -239 56.6% +0.51 9–5 (64%) 7–5 (58%) 105.2 -1.09 1978 1510 108.2 — — — — +45 — — 42.9% 0.00 0–1 1–1 — -0.02
21 1981 1902 159.2 — — — — -233 +53 — 61.4% +0.73 11–11 (50%) 14–9 (61%) 104.5 -2.54 1979 1550 117.1 — — — — +10 — — 40.0% -0.72 1–5 (17%) 6–2 (75%) 100.2 +0.18
22 1982 1887 151.8 — — — — -96 +44 — 60.2% +0.59 18–10 (64%) 12–9 (57%) 104.8 -1.90 1980 1770 143.7 — — — — -96 — 0 54.9% +0.44 6–7 (46%) 7–10 (41%) 101.4 -0.62
23 1983 1961 152.2 — — — — -52 +15 — 66.2% +0.91 8–8 (50%) 13–6 (68%) 101.9 -1.48 1981 1768 137.7 — — — — -11 -234 -8 55.1% +0.31 7–6 (54%) 9–9 (50%) 101.3 -0.60
24 1984 2075 162.7 — — — — -57 +57 -408 74.2% +1.57 14–6 (70%) 28–8 (78%) 112.5 -0.36 1982 1945 163.2 — — — — -10 — -133 62.7% +0.91 6–4 (60%) 5–9 (36%) 100.7 -5.36
25 1985 1972 156.7 — — — — +24 +63 — 59.6% +0.84 8–6 (57%) 6–3 (67%) 100.0 -2.07 1983 1933 158.2 — — — — -9 -409 +67 61.0% +0.59 4–7 (36%) 14–10 (58%) 99.7 -3.15
26 1986 1899 151.6 — — — — +57 +84 — 65.3% +0.96 19–3 (86%) 15–13 (54%) 104.4 +0.32 1984 1959 146.2 — — — — -46 — +79 59.9% +0.51 11–5 (69%) 13–11 (54%) 102.6 +0.12
27 1987 1914 153.2 — — — — +9 +79 -210 65.7% +0.91 13–5 (72%) 19–11 (63%) 105.9 -0.88 1985 1918 150.2 — — — — -82 — +233 67.4% +0.87 2–5 (29%) 13–11 (54%) 92.3 -0.51
28 1988 1808 143.7 — — — — -7 +174 — 59.9% +0.53 14–6 (70%) 13–4 (76%) 107.9 +0.08 1986 1893 151.4 — — — — +28 — +158 63.8% +0.73 9–8 (53%) 20–14 (59%) 98.3 -0.41
29 1989 1869 146.8 — — — — -39 +112 — 60.4% +0.46 9–7 (56%) 13–12 (52%) 97.9 -1.82 1987 1809 144.7 — — — — +41 — +158 53.9% +0.32 6–5 (55%) 9–13 (41%) 95.6 -1.25
30 1990 1719 152.3 — — — — -59 +350 — 56.2% +0.37 14–14 (50%) 22–13 (63%) 98.8 +1.72 1988 1813 143.0 — — — — +19 — +62 61.9% +0.75 13–6 (68%) 11–10 (52%) 101.7 +0.26
31 1991 1720 132.4 +1.72 -0.14 1.075 51.3% -41 +210 — 52.1% +0.27 8–8 (50%) 6–5 (55%) 97.3 +1.82 1989 1831 149.5 — — — — +48 — +1 61.7% +0.93 12–10 (55%) 13–9 (59%) 98.4 +0.21
32 1992 1676 124.1 +0.46 -0.28 0.968 49.8% -20 +116 — 50.0% +0.13 3–3 (50%) 3–5 (38%) 94.6 -0.39 1990 1798 141.4 — — — — -9 -239 +65 52.4% +0.25 8–6 (57%) 12–11 (52%) 99.8 -1.04
33 1993 1607 107.6 -1.77 +0.32 0.915 48.6% — +122 — 38.1% -0.95 1–4 (20%) 4–1 (80%) 98.4 +0.27 1991 1702 140.1 +1.54 -1.53 0.983 49.8% 0 — +133 48.0% +0.04 9–9 (50%) 11–12 (48%) 95.6 -2.21
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 1660 128.6 +0.39 -1.70 0.925 48.5% +15 — +118 45.1% -0.37 3–6 (33%) 1–8 (11%) 89.5 -0.53
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 1638 94.8 -1.10 -2.26 0.501 33.7% — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.19
Career — 2094 156.6 +0.93 -0.14 1.018 50.5% -35 +90 -295 61.4% +0.71 154–97 (61%) 181–105 (63%) 109.8 -1.07 — 2088 153.7 +1.04 -1.61 0.946 49.0% -1 -299 +63 57.4% +0.47 97–90 (52%) 145–140 (51%) 95.6 -2.59

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.