H2H data updated: 2026-09-03 00:00 UTC

Andres Gomez vs Kim Warwick H2H: 1-0

Andres Gomez holds a 1–0 lead over Kim Warwick in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Andres Gomez leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Andres Gomez won the 1982 Denver semifinal 6-4 7-6.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Andres Gomez
ECU Age 66 Left-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main draw meetings
Kim Warwick
AUS Age 74 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Andres Gomez #35 6-4 7-6 Kim Warwick #81 Match data Feb 6, 1982* SF Denver ATP 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Andres Gomez #1,171 #4 2,005 2,094 502 261 65.8% 1 0 0 3 17 21
Kim Warwick #1,294 #15 15 1,946 288 269 51.7% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Andres Gomez Kim Warwick
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 1969 0–1 0.0% — 1,483 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1970 6–8 42.9% — 1,468 0 0
19 1979 11–8 57.9% #61 1,639 0 0 1971 4–7 36.4% — 1,463 0 0
20 1980 36–23 61.0% #42 1,802 0 0 1972 11–9 55.0% — 1,566 0 0
21 1981 36–21 63.2% #37 1,901 0 1 1973 11–22 33.3% #108 1,567 0 0
22 1982 51–25 67.1% #15 1,887 0 3 1974 30–23 56.6% #48 1,718 0 0
23 1983 43–20 68.3% #14 1,960 0 4 1975 27–23 54.0% #49 1,739 0 0
24 1984 60–13 82.2% #5 2,074 0 9 1976 28–32 46.7% #67 1,750 0 1
25 1985 26–14 65.0% #15 1,971 0 10 1977 35–29 54.7% #42 1,713 0 1
26 1986 57–20 74.0% #10 1,898 0 14 1978 29–23 55.8% #41 1,790 0 1
27 1987 46–18 71.9% #11 1,913 0 15 1979 36–25 59.0% #52 1,808 0 2
28 1988 34–18 65.4% #24 1,808 0 15 1980 39–25 60.9% #36 1,927 0 3
29 1989 32–17 65.3% #17 1,869 0 17 1981 6–11 35.3% #29 1,758 0 3
30 1990 38–27 58.5% #6 1,719 1 20 1982 15–15 50.0% #36 1,786 0 3
31 1991 20–19 51.3% #70 1,720 1 21 1983 3–7 30.0% #99 1,681 0 3
32 1992 10–12 45.5% #179 1,675 1 21 1984 6–5 54.5% #196 1,690 0 3
33 1993 2–6 25.0% #402 1,606 1 21 1985 1–3 25.0% #497 1,667 0 3
36 — — — — — — — 1988 1–1 50.0% #600 1,655 0 3

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Andres Gomez Kim Warwick
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1969 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1970 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 5 5 10 50.0% — — — —
19 1979 1 1 2 50.0% 10 7 17 58.8% — — — — — — — — 1971 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — —
20 1980 2 2 4 50.0% 30 17 47 63.8% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1972 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 10 6 16 62.5% — — — —
21 1981 4 3 7 57.1% 32 16 48 66.7% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 1973 1 4 5 20.0% 7 9 16 43.8% 2 6 8 25.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
22 1982 3 2 5 60.0% 38 16 54 70.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 1974 12 8 20 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 7 6 13 53.8% 11 8 19 57.9%
23 1983 16 6 22 72.7% 21 10 31 67.7% — — — — 6 4 10 60.0% 1975 5 7 12 41.7% 6 5 11 54.5% 5 3 8 62.5% 11 8 19 57.9%
24 1984 11 3 14 78.6% 35 5 40 87.5% 4 1 5 80.0% 10 4 14 71.4% 1976 5 6 11 45.5% 15 12 27 55.6% 6 5 11 54.5% 2 9 11 18.2%
25 1985 11 3 14 78.6% 8 6 14 57.1% — — — — 7 5 12 58.3% 1977 3 7 10 30.0% 17 10 27 63.0% 12 9 21 57.1% 3 3 6 50.0%
26 1986 18 5 23 78.3% 34 9 43 79.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 1978 3 4 7 42.9% 11 7 18 61.1% 8 4 12 66.7% 7 8 15 46.7%
27 1987 15 6 21 71.4% 23 8 31 74.2% 3 1 4 75.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 1979 6 5 11 54.5% 9 9 18 50.0% 14 6 20 70.0% 7 5 12 58.3%
28 1988 17 9 26 65.4% 15 6 21 71.4% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% 1980 9 5 14 64.3% 10 10 20 50.0% 15 6 21 71.4% 5 4 9 55.6%
29 1989 12 7 19 63.2% 18 8 26 69.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1981 1 6 7 14.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
30 1990 10 10 20 50.0% 24 6 30 80.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 10 14 28.6% 1982 7 6 13 53.8% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 4 3 7 57.1%
31 1991 8 10 18 44.4% 6 8 14 42.9% — — — — 6 1 7 85.7% 1983 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
32 1992 2 3 5 40.0% 8 9 17 47.1% — — — — — — — — 1984 — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
33 1993 0 2 2 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — 1985 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 130 72 202 64.4% 304 135 439 69.2% 10 8 18 55.6% 58 46 104 55.8% — 59 68 127 46.5% 80 74 154 51.9% 95 70 165 57.6% 54 57 111 48.6%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Andres Gomez Kim Warwick
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1969 1483 95.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.09
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1970 1469 102.8 — — — — — — +41 43.8% -0.16 1–2 (33%) — — +1.42
19 1979 1640 133.9 — — — — — +23 — 53.3% +0.13 5–1 (83%) 6–1 (86%) — +0.20 1971 1464 110.3 — — — — +69 — +62 41.2% -0.47 1–3 (25%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.86
20 1980 1803 150.2 — — — — -218 +37 -239 56.6% +0.51 9–5 (64%) 7–5 (58%) — -1.09 1972 1566 111.3 — — — — — — +71 52.9% -0.20 2–0 7–2 (78%) — +0.23
21 1981 1902 159.2 — — — — -233 +53 — 61.4% +0.73 11–11 (50%) 14–9 (61%) — -2.54 1973 1567 117.1 — — — — -67 -6 +9 41.9% -0.62 4–6 (40%) 2–2 (50%) — +0.29
22 1982 1887 151.8 — — — — -96 +44 — 60.2% +0.59 18–10 (64%) 12–9 (57%) — -1.90 1974 1718 135.3 — — — — +35 — -71 57.9% +0.40 8–8 (50%) 9–5 (64%) — +3.10
23 1983 1961 152.2 — — — — -52 +15 — 66.2% +0.91 8–8 (50%) 13–6 (68%) — -1.48 1975 1740 131.7 — — — — -44 -122 +35 53.0% -0.02 8–6 (57%) 10–3 (77%) — +1.45
24 1984 2075 162.7 — — — — -57 +57 -408 74.2% +1.57 14–6 (70%) 28–8 (78%) — -0.36 1976 1750 140.2 — — — — -100 -13 +61 52.1% +0.06 6–14 (30%) 9–9 (50%) — +0.01
25 1985 1972 156.7 — — — — +24 +63 — 59.6% +0.84 8–6 (57%) 6–3 (67%) — -2.07 1977 1714 136.9 — — — — -91 +94 +27 53.7% +0.18 14–4 (78%) 8–3 (73%) — +1.00
26 1986 1899 151.6 — — — — +57 +84 — 65.3% +0.96 19–3 (86%) 15–13 (54%) — +0.32 1978 1790 148.2 — — — — -41 -3 +16 52.6% +0.14 12–6 (67%) 12–12 (50%) — -1.65
27 1987 1914 153.2 — — — — +9 +79 -210 65.7% +0.91 13–5 (72%) 19–11 (63%) — -0.88 1979 1808 135.7 — — — — -13 -87 +52 56.5% +0.25 9–5 (64%) 13–6 (68%) — +3.20
28 1988 1808 143.7 — — — — -7 +174 — 59.9% +0.53 14–6 (70%) 13–4 (76%) — +0.08 1980 1928 142.9 — — — — -103 -179 +49 57.2% +0.61 16–7 (70%) 8–12 (40%) — -0.21
29 1989 1869 146.8 — — — — -39 +112 — 60.4% +0.46 9–7 (56%) 13–12 (52%) — -1.82 1981 1758 117.9 — — — — -77 — +186 47.2% +0.08 2–1 (67%) 1–4 (20%) — +1.26
30 1990 1719 152.3 — — — — -59 +350 — 56.2% +0.37 14–14 (50%) 22–13 (63%) — +1.72 1982 1786 145.7 — — — — +25 -97 +71 52.1% +0.49 5–5 (50%) 2–7 (22%) — -1.50
31 1991 1720 132.4 +1.72 -0.14 1.075 51.3% -41 +210 — 52.1% +0.27 8–8 (50%) 6–5 (55%) — +1.82 1983 1681 108.0 — — — — +19 — — 34.5% -0.90 2–1 (67%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.49
32 1992 1676 124.1 +0.46 -0.28 0.968 49.8% -20 +116 — 50.0% +0.13 3–3 (50%) 3–5 (38%) — -0.39 1984 1690 121.4 — — — — — +41 +128 65.2% +0.87 3–2 (60%) 1–1 — +0.40
33 1993 1607 107.6 -1.77 +0.32 0.915 48.6% — +122 — 38.1% -0.95 1–4 (20%) 4–1 (80%) — +0.27 1985 1668 111.3 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 1–1 — -0.42
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 1655 100.3 — — — — — — — 40.0% -0.20 1–0 0–1 — +0.23
Career — 2094 156.6 +0.93 -0.14 1.018 50.5% -35 +90 -295 61.4% +0.71 154–97 (61%) 181–105 (63%) 109.8 -1.07 — 1947 139.8 — — — — -34 -32 +42 52.5% +0.13 94–71 (57%) 86–71 (55%) 110.5 +1.86

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.