H2H data updated: 2026-09-05 00:00 UTC

Andres Gomez vs Leonardo Lavalle H2H: 1-0

Andres Gomez holds a 1–0 lead over Leonardo Lavalle in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Andres Gomez leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Andres Gomez won the 1989 Wimbledon round of 128 3-6 6-4 6-4 7-6.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Andres Gomez
ECU Age 66 Left-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main draw meetings
Leonardo Lavalle
MEX Age 59 Left-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Andres Gomez #29 3-6 6-4 6-4 7-6 Leonardo Lavalle #65 Match data Jun 28, 1989* R128 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Andres Gomez #1,171 #4 2,005 2,094 502 261 65.8% 1 0 0 3 17 21
Leonardo Lavalle #968 #51 483 1,728 64 98 39.5% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Andres Gomez Leonardo Lavalle
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 1985 4–5 44.4% #87 1,558 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1986 10–17 37.0% #105 1,588 0 0
19 1979 11–8 57.9% #61 1,639 0 0 1987 2–9 18.2% #224 1,531 0 0
20 1980 36–23 61.0% #42 1,802 0 0 1988 10–8 55.6% #64 1,654 0 0
21 1981 36–21 63.2% #37 1,901 0 1 1989 11–15 42.3% #132 1,649 0 0
22 1982 51–25 67.1% #15 1,887 0 3 1990 5–9 35.7% #183 1,596 0 0
23 1983 43–20 68.3% #14 1,960 0 4 1991 5–3 62.5% #133 1,658 0 1
24 1984 60–13 82.2% #5 2,074 0 9 1992 10–16 38.5% #99 1,645 0 1
25 1985 26–14 65.0% #15 1,971 0 10 1993 4–9 30.8% #309 1,596 0 1
26 1986 57–20 74.0% #10 1,898 0 14 1994 0–2 0.0% #213 1,568 0 1
27 1987 46–18 71.9% #11 1,913 0 15 1995 1–2 33.3% #362 1,565 0 1
28 1988 34–18 65.4% #24 1,808 0 15 1996 1–1 50.0% #313 1,570 0 1
29 1989 32–17 65.3% #17 1,869 0 17 1997 0–1 0.0% #439 1,561 0 1
30 1990 38–27 58.5% #6 1,719 1 20 1998 1–1 50.0% #400 1,569 0 1
31 1991 20–19 51.3% #70 1,720 1 21 — — — — — — —
32 1992 10–12 45.5% #179 1,675 1 21 — — — — — — —
33 1993 2–6 25.0% #402 1,606 1 21 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Andres Gomez Leonardo Lavalle
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 2 2 4 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 3 8 11 27.3% 4 4 8 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
19 1979 1 1 2 50.0% 10 7 17 58.8% — — — — — — — — 1987 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
20 1980 2 2 4 50.0% 30 17 47 63.8% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1988 5 5 10 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 4 1 5 80.0%
21 1981 4 3 7 57.1% 32 16 48 66.7% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 1989 5 5 10 50.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
22 1982 3 2 5 60.0% 38 16 54 70.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 1990 2 3 5 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
23 1983 16 6 22 72.7% 21 10 31 67.7% — — — — 6 4 10 60.0% 1991 5 1 6 83.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
24 1984 11 3 14 78.6% 35 5 40 87.5% 4 1 5 80.0% 10 4 14 71.4% 1992 6 11 17 35.3% 3 1 4 75.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 1985 11 3 14 78.6% 8 6 14 57.1% — — — — 7 5 12 58.3% 1993 2 5 7 28.6% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — —
26 1986 18 5 23 78.3% 34 9 43 79.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 1994 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
27 1987 15 6 21 71.4% 23 8 31 74.2% 3 1 4 75.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 1995 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
28 1988 17 9 26 65.4% 15 6 21 71.4% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% 1996 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
29 1989 12 7 19 63.2% 18 8 26 69.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1997 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1990 10 10 20 50.0% 24 6 30 80.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 10 14 28.6% 1998 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
31 1991 8 10 18 44.4% 6 8 14 42.9% — — — — 6 1 7 85.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1992 2 3 5 40.0% 8 9 17 47.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1993 0 2 2 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 130 72 202 64.4% 304 135 439 69.2% 10 8 18 55.6% 58 46 104 55.8% — 30 45 75 40.0% 22 29 51 43.1% 1 10 11 9.1% 11 14 25 44.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Andres Gomez Leonardo Lavalle
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 1558 126.7 — — — — +14 -9 — 44.0% 0.00 2–1 (67%) 1–1 — -0.29
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 1588 127.2 — — — — 0 -11 — 37.5% -1.03 7–5 (58%) 5–2 (71%) 106.3 -1.10
19 1979 1640 133.9 — — — — — +23 — 53.3% +0.13 5–1 (83%) 6–1 (86%) 109.8 +0.20 1987 1531 120.6 — — — — +31 +34 — 29.6% -1.04 0–3 (0%) 0–2 — -0.54
20 1980 1803 150.2 — — — — -218 +37 -239 56.6% +0.51 9–5 (64%) 7–5 (58%) 105.2 -1.09 1988 1654 137.9 — — — — +26 -94 — 41.5% -0.51 4–2 (67%) 3–3 (50%) 105.5 -0.81
21 1981 1902 159.2 — — — — -233 +53 — 61.4% +0.73 11–11 (50%) 14–9 (61%) 104.5 -2.54 1989 1649 126.6 — — — — +31 -56 — 47.0% -0.28 3–5 (38%) 6–4 (60%) 99.7 -0.27
22 1982 1887 151.8 — — — — -96 +44 — 60.2% +0.59 18–10 (64%) 12–9 (57%) 104.8 -1.90 1990 1596 107.2 — — — — +43 -11 — 42.4% -0.52 2–3 (40%) 1–4 (20%) 94.1 +0.85
23 1983 1961 152.2 — — — — -52 +15 — 66.2% +0.91 8–8 (50%) 13–6 (68%) 101.9 -1.48 1991 1658 122.7 +0.15 -1.21 1.022 50.1% +34 — — 50.0% -0.05 3–0 (100%) 2–3 (40%) 104.1 -0.14
24 1984 2075 162.7 — — — — -57 +57 -408 74.2% +1.57 14–6 (70%) 28–8 (78%) 112.5 -0.36 1992 1646 122.6 -0.34 -1.80 0.915 48.1% -19 -9 -164 45.7% -0.40 2–6 (25%) 4–5 (44%) 95.2 -0.27
25 1985 1972 156.7 — — — — +24 +63 — 59.6% +0.84 8–6 (57%) 6–3 (67%) 100.0 -2.07 1993 1596 111.1 -2.52 -2.49 0.792 45.9% +5 -12 — 25.8% -1.45 4–0 (100%) 1–1 — -0.61
26 1986 1899 151.6 — — — — +57 +84 — 65.3% +0.96 19–3 (86%) 15–13 (54%) 104.4 +0.32 1994 1568 101.6 -2.71 -1.42 0.785 45.0% — — — 0.0% -2.50 — 0–1 — +0.04
27 1987 1914 153.2 — — — — +9 +79 -210 65.7% +0.91 13–5 (72%) 19–11 (63%) 105.9 -0.88 1995 1566 110.6 +3.66 +0.68 0.964 49.0% — — — 25.0% -1.75 1–0 — — -0.25
28 1988 1808 143.7 — — — — -7 +174 — 59.9% +0.53 14–6 (70%) 13–4 (76%) 107.9 +0.08 1996 1570 108.2 +1.19 -1.53 0.827 46.0% — — — 50.0% +0.75 — 0–1 — +0.04
29 1989 1869 146.8 — — — — -39 +112 — 60.4% +0.46 9–7 (56%) 13–12 (52%) 97.9 -1.82 1997 1562 106.7 +1.45 -0.38 0.815 47.5% — — — 33.3% -0.33 0–1 0–1 — -0.10
30 1990 1719 152.3 — — — — -59 +350 — 56.2% +0.37 14–14 (50%) 22–13 (63%) 98.8 +1.72 1998 1570 108.2 +2.32 -0.20 1.053 50.1% — — — 50.0% 0.00 — 1–1 — -0.06
31 1991 1720 132.4 +1.72 -0.14 1.075 51.3% -41 +210 — 52.1% +0.27 8–8 (50%) 6–5 (55%) 97.3 +1.82 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1992 1676 124.1 +0.46 -0.28 0.968 49.8% -20 +116 — 50.0% +0.13 3–3 (50%) 3–5 (38%) 94.6 -0.39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1993 1607 107.6 -1.77 +0.32 0.915 48.6% — +122 — 38.1% -0.95 1–4 (20%) 4–1 (80%) 98.4 +0.27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2094 156.6 +0.93 -0.14 1.018 50.5% -35 +90 -295 61.4% +0.71 154–97 (61%) 181–105 (63%) 109.8 -1.07 — 1729 132.9 -0.51 -1.65 0.890 47.8% +14 -24 -164 40.7% -0.61 28–26 (52%) 24–29 (45%) 102.3 -2.18

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.