Andres Gomez
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ivan Lendl | 2 | 16 | 18 | Nov 12, 1990 | H2H |
| Diego Perez | 9 | 4 | 13 | May 4, 1990 | H2H |
| Aaron Krickstein | 8 | 3 | 11 | Dec 15, 1990 | H2H |
| Jimmy Connors | 1 | 10 | 11 | Sep 3, 1989 | H2H |
| Jose Luis Clerc | 3 | 8 | 11 | May 31, 1989 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC
Andres Gomez holds a 3–0 lead over Libor Pimek in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Andres Gomez leads 2–0 on clay and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Andres Gomez won the 1987 Frankfurt quarterfinal 6-2 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andres Gomez | 6-2 6-4 | Libor Pimek | Match data | Nov 15, 1987* | QF | Frankfurt | ATP 250 | Carpet |
| Andres Gomez | 3-6 7-5 6-4 | Libor Pimek | Match data | Jul 26, 1985* | R16 | Indianapolis | ATP 250 | Clay |
| Andres Gomez | 6-2 7-5 | Libor Pimek | Match data | Aug 3, 1984* | R16 | North Conway | ATP 250 | Clay |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andres Gomez | #1,171 | #4 | 2,005 | 2,094 | 502 | 261 | 65.8% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 17 | 21 |
| Libor Pimek | #1,308 | #21 | 73 | 1,860 | 124 | 119 | 51.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Andres Gomez | Libor Pimek | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 1979 | 11–8 | 57.9% | #61 | 1,639 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 19–14 | 57.6% | #57 | 1,679 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1980 | 36–23 | 61.0% | #42 | 1,802 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 31–18 | 63.3% | #25 | 1,765 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1981 | 36–21 | 63.2% | #37 | 1,901 | 0 | 1 | 1985 | 25–19 | 56.8% | #34 | 1,785 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1982 | 51–25 | 67.1% | #15 | 1,887 | 0 | 3 | 1986 | 26–25 | 51.0% | #71 | 1,693 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1983 | 43–20 | 68.3% | #14 | 1,960 | 0 | 4 | 1987 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #95 | 1,659 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1984 | 60–13 | 82.2% | #5 | 2,074 | 0 | 9 | 1988 | 10–20 | 33.3% | #234 | 1,563 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1985 | 26–14 | 65.0% | #15 | 1,971 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1986 | 57–20 | 74.0% | #10 | 1,898 | 0 | 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1987 | 46–18 | 71.9% | #11 | 1,913 | 0 | 15 | 1991 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #332 | 1,531 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1988 | 34–18 | 65.4% | #24 | 1,808 | 0 | 15 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #742 | 1,517 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 1989 | 32–17 | 65.3% | #17 | 1,869 | 0 | 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1990 | 38–27 | 58.5% | #6 | 1,719 | 1 | 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1991 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #70 | 1,720 | 1 | 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1992 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #179 | 1,675 | 1 | 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1993 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #402 | 1,606 | 1 | 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Andres Gomez | Libor Pimek | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 19 | 1979 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 10 | 7 | 17 | 58.8% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 14 | 8 | 22 | 63.6% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% |
| 20 | 1980 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 30 | 17 | 47 | 63.8% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 1984 | 6 | 6 | 12 | 50.0% | 23 | 10 | 33 | 69.7% | — | — | — | — | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% |
| 21 | 1981 | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 32 | 16 | 48 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1985 | 13 | 8 | 21 | 61.9% | 12 | 10 | 22 | 54.5% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 22 | 1982 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 38 | 16 | 54 | 70.4% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 10 | 6 | 16 | 62.5% | 1986 | 5 | 7 | 12 | 41.7% | 15 | 12 | 27 | 55.6% | — | — | — | — | 6 | 6 | 12 | 50.0% |
| 23 | 1983 | 16 | 6 | 22 | 72.7% | 21 | 10 | 31 | 67.7% | — | — | — | — | 6 | 4 | 10 | 60.0% | 1987 | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 4 | 11 | 15 | 26.7% | — | — | — | — | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% |
| 24 | 1984 | 11 | 3 | 14 | 78.6% | 35 | 5 | 40 | 87.5% | 4 | 1 | 5 | 80.0% | 10 | 4 | 14 | 71.4% | 1988 | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 5 | 10 | 15 | 33.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% |
| 25 | 1985 | 11 | 3 | 14 | 78.6% | 8 | 6 | 14 | 57.1% | — | — | — | — | 7 | 5 | 12 | 58.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1986 | 18 | 5 | 23 | 78.3% | 34 | 9 | 43 | 79.1% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1987 | 15 | 6 | 21 | 71.4% | 23 | 8 | 31 | 74.2% | 3 | 1 | 4 | 75.0% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | 1991 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% |
| 28 | 1988 | 17 | 9 | 26 | 65.4% | 15 | 6 | 21 | 71.4% | — | — | — | — | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 1992 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1989 | 12 | 7 | 19 | 63.2% | 18 | 8 | 26 | 69.2% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1990 | 10 | 10 | 20 | 50.0% | 24 | 6 | 30 | 80.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 4 | 10 | 14 | 28.6% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1991 | 8 | 10 | 18 | 44.4% | 6 | 8 | 14 | 42.9% | — | — | — | — | 6 | 1 | 7 | 85.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1992 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 8 | 9 | 17 | 47.1% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1993 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 130 | 72 | 202 | 64.4% | 304 | 135 | 439 | 69.2% | 10 | 8 | 18 | 55.6% | 58 | 46 | 104 | 55.8% | — | 35 | 33 | 68 | 51.5% | 74 | 63 | 137 | 54.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 15 | 21 | 36 | 41.7% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Andres Gomez | Libor Pimek | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 19 | 1979 | 1640 | 133.9 | — | — | — | — | — | +23 | — | 53.3% | +0.13 | 5–1 (83%) | 6–1 (86%) | — | +0.20 | 1983 | 1680 | 144.4 | — | — | — | — | -76 | +43 | — | 53.7% | +0.38 | 6–4 (60%) | 0–2 | — | +0.95 |
| 20 | 1980 | 1803 | 150.2 | — | — | — | — | -218 | +37 | -239 | 56.6% | +0.51 | 9–5 (64%) | 7–5 (58%) | — | -1.09 | 1984 | 1766 | 147.4 | — | — | — | — | -132 | +110 | — | 58.2% | +0.51 | 7–3 (70%) | 5–2 (71%) | — | -1.14 |
| 21 | 1981 | 1902 | 159.2 | — | — | — | — | -233 | +53 | — | 61.4% | +0.73 | 11–11 (50%) | 14–9 (61%) | — | -2.54 | 1985 | 1786 | 142.2 | — | — | — | — | -63 | +23 | — | 54.2% | +0.26 | 10–6 (63%) | 8–6 (57%) | — | -2.15 |
| 22 | 1982 | 1887 | 151.8 | — | — | — | — | -96 | +44 | — | 60.2% | +0.59 | 18–10 (64%) | 12–9 (57%) | — | -1.90 | 1986 | 1694 | 123.8 | — | — | — | — | -33 | +69 | — | 47.5% | -0.46 | 10–4 (71%) | 4–7 (36%) | — | +1.70 |
| 23 | 1983 | 1961 | 152.2 | — | — | — | — | -52 | +15 | — | 66.2% | +0.91 | 8–8 (50%) | 13–6 (68%) | — | -1.48 | 1987 | 1660 | 122.6 | — | — | — | — | +56 | -51 | — | 43.1% | -0.79 | 3–4 (43%) | 4–1 (80%) | — | +0.05 |
| 24 | 1984 | 2075 | 162.7 | — | — | — | — | -57 | +57 | -408 | 74.2% | +1.57 | 14–6 (70%) | 28–8 (78%) | — | -0.36 | 1988 | 1564 | 116.7 | — | — | — | — | +89 | -31 | — | 33.3% | -1.07 | 5–4 (56%) | 3–1 (75%) | — | -0.74 |
| 25 | 1985 | 1972 | 156.7 | — | — | — | — | +24 | +63 | — | 59.6% | +0.84 | 8–6 (57%) | 6–3 (67%) | — | -2.07 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1986 | 1899 | 151.6 | — | — | — | — | +57 | +84 | — | 65.3% | +0.96 | 19–3 (86%) | 15–13 (54%) | — | +0.32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1987 | 1914 | 153.2 | — | — | — | — | +9 | +79 | -210 | 65.7% | +0.91 | 13–5 (72%) | 19–11 (63%) | — | -0.88 | 1991 | 1531 | 106.0 | -0.47 | -0.21 | 0.902 | 47.9% | +81 | — | — | 27.3% | -1.45 | 0–1 | 0–1 | — | +0.28 |
| 28 | 1988 | 1808 | 143.7 | — | — | — | — | -7 | +174 | — | 59.9% | +0.53 | 14–6 (70%) | 13–4 (76%) | — | +0.08 | 1992 | 1518 | 97.8 | +0.55 | -1.38 | 0.649 | 40.7% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -4.00 | — | — | — | +0.07 |
| 29 | 1989 | 1869 | 146.8 | — | — | — | — | -39 | +112 | — | 60.4% | +0.46 | 9–7 (56%) | 13–12 (52%) | — | -1.82 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1990 | 1719 | 152.3 | — | — | — | — | -59 | +350 | — | 56.2% | +0.37 | 14–14 (50%) | 22–13 (63%) | — | +1.72 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1991 | 1720 | 132.4 | +1.72 | -0.14 | 1.075 | 51.3% | -41 | +210 | — | 52.1% | +0.27 | 8–8 (50%) | 6–5 (55%) | — | +1.82 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1992 | 1676 | 124.1 | +0.46 | -0.28 | 0.968 | 49.8% | -20 | +116 | — | 50.0% | +0.13 | 3–3 (50%) | 3–5 (38%) | — | -0.39 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1993 | 1607 | 107.6 | -1.77 | +0.32 | 0.915 | 48.6% | — | +122 | — | 38.1% | -0.95 | 1–4 (20%) | 4–1 (80%) | — | +0.27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 2094 | 156.6 | +0.93 | -0.14 | 1.018 | 50.5% | -35 | +90 | -295 | 61.4% | +0.71 | 154–97 (61%) | 181–105 (63%) | 109.8 | -1.07 | — | 1861 | 138.4 | -0.27 | -0.44 | 0.842 | 46.5% | -26 | +43 | — | 48.7% | -0.17 | 41–26 (61%) | 24–20 (55%) | 109.7 | -0.40 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ivan Lendl | 2 | 16 | 18 | Nov 12, 1990 | H2H |
| Diego Perez | 9 | 4 | 13 | May 4, 1990 | H2H |
| Aaron Krickstein | 8 | 3 | 11 | Dec 15, 1990 | H2H |
| Jimmy Connors | 1 | 10 | 11 | Sep 3, 1989 | H2H |
| Jose Luis Clerc | 3 | 8 | 11 | May 31, 1989 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Martin Jaite | 2 | 4 | 6 | Mar 16, 1988 | H2H |
| Thierry Tulasne | 2 | 4 | 6 | Jul 16, 1987 | H2H |
| Pavel Slozil | 5 | 1 | 6 | Nov 22, 1985 | H2H |
| Mats Wilander | 0 | 5 | 5 | Sep 7, 1987 | H2H |
| Aaron Krickstein | 1 | 3 | 4 | Oct 23, 1991 | H2H |