H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Andres Gomez vs Luiz Mattar H2H: 1-3
Luiz Mattar holds a 3–1 lead over Andres Gomez in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Luiz Mattar leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Luiz Mattar won the 1991 New Haven second round 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ECU
Age 66
Left-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
1
–
3
4 main draw meetings
BRA
Age 62
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 14, 1991* | New Haven | ATP 250 | R64 | Hard | Luiz Mattar | 6-2 6-3 | Andres Gomez | Match data |
| Aug 29, 1990* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Luiz Mattar | 6-3 3-6 6-3 6-3 | Andres Gomez | Match data |
| Jul 19, 1990* | Stuttgart Outdoor | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Andres Gomez | 7-5 6-4 | Luiz Mattar | Match data |
| May 10, 1990* | Hamburg Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Clay | Luiz Mattar | 6-7 7-6 6-3 | Andres Gomez | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andres Gomez | #1,171 | #4 | 2,005 | 2,092 | 502 | 261 | 65.8% | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 18 | 21 |
| Luiz Mattar | #888 | #29 | 796 | 1,772 | 176 | 161 | 52.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 7 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Andres Gomez | Luiz Mattar | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 1979 | 11–8 | 57.9% | #61 | 1,638 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1980 | 36–23 | 61.0% | #42 | 1,800 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1981 | 36–21 | 63.2% | #37 | 1,899 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1982 | 51–25 | 67.1% | #15 | 1,885 | 0 | 3 | 1986 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #95 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1983 | 43–20 | 68.3% | #14 | 1,959 | 0 | 4 | 1987 | 24–17 | 58.5% | #38 | 1,696 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1984 | 60–13 | 82.2% | #5 | 2,072 | 0 | 9 | 1988 | 19–16 | 54.3% | #44 | 1,691 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1985 | 26–14 | 65.0% | #15 | 1,970 | 0 | 10 | 1989 | 23–15 | 60.5% | #62 | 1,684 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 1986 | 57–20 | 74.0% | #10 | 1,898 | 0 | 14 | 1990 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #43 | 1,696 | 0 | 5 |
| 27 | 1987 | 46–18 | 71.9% | #11 | 1,913 | 0 | 15 | 1991 | 17–24 | 41.5% | #113 | 1,635 | 0 | 5 |
| 28 | 1988 | 34–18 | 65.4% | #24 | 1,808 | 0 | 15 | 1992 | 21–16 | 56.8% | #51 | 1,718 | 0 | 6 |
| 29 | 1989 | 32–17 | 65.3% | #17 | 1,868 | 0 | 17 | 1993 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #70 | 1,691 | 0 | 6 |
| 30 | 1990 | 38–27 | 58.5% | #6 | 1,726 | 1 | 20 | 1994 | 20–18 | 52.6% | #73 | 1,696 | 0 | 7 |
| 31 | 1991 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #70 | 1,722 | 1 | 21 | 1995 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #404 | 1,593 | 0 | 7 |
| 32 | 1992 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #179 | 1,676 | 1 | 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1993 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #402 | 1,606 | 1 | 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |