H2H data updated: 2026-09-04 00:00 UTC

Andres Gomez vs Mark Edmondson H2H: 2-1

Andres Gomez holds a 2–1 lead over Mark Edmondson in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Andres Gomez leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Andres Gomez won the 1983 Tokyo Indoor round of 16 6-4 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Andres Gomez
ECU Age 66 Left-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main draw meetings
Mark Edmondson
AUS Age 72 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Andres Gomez #13 6-4 6-4 Mark Edmondson #32 Match data Oct 28, 1983* R16 Tokyo Indoor ATP 250 Carpet
Mark Edmondson #24 7-5 0-6 6-3 Andres Gomez #17 Match data Mar 31, 1983* R32 Monte-Carlo Masters ATP 250 Clay
Andres Gomez #53 6-3 6-3 Mark Edmondson #78 Match data Jul 29, 1980* R64 North Conway ATP 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Andres Gomez #1,171 #4 2,005 2,094 502 261 65.8% 1 0 0 3 17 21
Mark Edmondson #525 #15 0 1,927 244 231 51.4% 1 0 0 0 5 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Andres Gomez Mark Edmondson
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 1972 0–1 0.0% — 1,496 0 0
19 1979 11–8 57.9% #61 1,639 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1980 36–23 61.0% #42 1,802 0 0 1974 1–2 33.3% — 1,488 0 0
21 1981 36–21 63.2% #37 1,901 0 1 1975 2–4 33.3% #212 1,500 0 0
22 1982 51–25 67.1% #15 1,887 0 3 1976 42–29 59.2% #35 1,755 1 2
23 1983 43–20 68.3% #14 1,960 0 4 1977 16–24 40.0% #92 1,602 1 2
24 1984 60–13 82.2% #5 2,074 0 9 1978 15–16 48.4% #79 1,685 1 3
25 1985 26–14 65.0% #15 1,971 0 10 1979 26–26 50.0% #95 1,742 1 3
26 1986 57–20 74.0% #10 1,898 0 14 1980 18–23 43.9% #91 1,715 1 3
27 1987 46–18 71.9% #11 1,913 0 15 1981 59–26 69.4% #23 1,902 1 6
28 1988 34–18 65.4% #24 1,808 0 15 1982 27–25 51.9% #18 1,708 1 6
29 1989 32–17 65.3% #17 1,869 0 17 1983 16–17 48.5% #37 1,687 1 6
30 1990 38–27 58.5% #6 1,719 1 20 1984 9–18 33.3% #145 1,573 1 6
31 1991 20–19 51.3% #70 1,720 1 21 1985 9–10 47.4% #115 1,595 1 6
32 1992 10–12 45.5% #179 1,675 1 21 1986 3–9 25.0% #307 1,539 1 6
33 1993 2–6 25.0% #402 1,606 1 21 1987 1–1 50.0% #523 1,550 1 6

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Andres Gomez Mark Edmondson
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1972 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1979 1 1 2 50.0% 10 7 17 58.8% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1980 2 2 4 50.0% 30 17 47 63.8% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1974 — — — — — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
21 1981 4 3 7 57.1% 32 16 48 66.7% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 1975 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
22 1982 3 2 5 60.0% 38 16 54 70.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 1976 8 4 12 66.7% 19 20 39 48.7% 14 3 17 82.4% 1 2 3 33.3%
23 1983 16 6 22 72.7% 21 10 31 67.7% — — — — 6 4 10 60.0% 1977 3 5 8 37.5% 7 10 17 41.2% 5 6 11 45.5% 1 3 4 25.0%
24 1984 11 3 14 78.6% 35 5 40 87.5% 4 1 5 80.0% 10 4 14 71.4% 1978 1 4 5 20.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 8 4 12 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3%
25 1985 11 3 14 78.6% 8 6 14 57.1% — — — — 7 5 12 58.3% 1979 4 5 9 44.4% 5 9 14 35.7% 14 7 21 66.7% 3 5 8 37.5%
26 1986 18 5 23 78.3% 34 9 43 79.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 1980 4 5 9 44.4% 4 8 12 33.3% 5 5 10 50.0% 5 5 10 50.0%
27 1987 15 6 21 71.4% 23 8 31 74.2% 3 1 4 75.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 1981 14 8 22 63.6% 9 9 18 50.0% 25 4 29 86.2% 11 5 16 68.8%
28 1988 17 9 26 65.4% 15 6 21 71.4% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% 1982 5 6 11 45.5% 3 5 8 37.5% 11 6 17 64.7% 8 8 16 50.0%
29 1989 12 7 19 63.2% 18 8 26 69.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1983 8 6 14 57.1% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 2 4 6 33.3%
30 1990 10 10 20 50.0% 24 6 30 80.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 10 14 28.6% 1984 1 7 8 12.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 1 4 5 20.0%
31 1991 8 10 18 44.4% 6 8 14 42.9% — — — — 6 1 7 85.7% 1985 0 2 2 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 6 6 12 50.0% — — — —
32 1992 2 3 5 40.0% 8 9 17 47.1% — — — — — — — — 1986 2 4 6 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
33 1993 0 2 2 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — 1987 — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
Career — 130 72 202 64.4% 304 135 439 69.2% 10 8 18 55.6% 58 46 104 55.8% — 50 58 108 46.3% 59 76 135 43.7% 102 58 160 63.8% 33 39 72 45.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Andres Gomez Mark Edmondson
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1972 1497 101.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.13
19 1979 1640 133.9 — — — — — +23 — 53.3% +0.13 5–1 (83%) 6–1 (86%) 109.8 +0.20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1980 1803 150.2 — — — — -218 +37 -239 56.6% +0.51 9–5 (64%) 7–5 (58%) 105.2 -1.09 1974 1489 104.0 — — — — — — +36 42.9% -0.72 0–1 1–1 — +0.03
21 1981 1902 159.2 — — — — -233 +53 — 61.4% +0.73 11–11 (50%) 14–9 (61%) 104.5 -2.54 1975 1501 106.2 — — — — — — +36 42.9% -0.67 1–1 0–1 — +0.53
22 1982 1887 151.8 — — — — -96 +44 — 60.2% +0.59 18–10 (64%) 12–9 (57%) 104.8 -1.90 1976 1756 137.6 — — — — -128 -137 +160 56.1% +0.33 14–13 (52%) 18–8 (69%) 111.1 +4.22
23 1983 1961 152.2 — — — — -52 +15 — 66.2% +0.91 8–8 (50%) 13–6 (68%) 101.9 -1.48 1977 1603 131.0 — — — — -25 +7 +221 47.7% +0.01 4–13 (24%) 3–4 (43%) 91.2 +1.28
24 1984 2075 162.7 — — — — -57 +57 -408 74.2% +1.57 14–6 (70%) 28–8 (78%) 112.5 -0.36 1978 1686 136.0 — — — — -115 -93 +199 47.3% -0.14 4–2 (67%) 4–2 (67%) 104.2 -0.12
25 1985 1972 156.7 — — — — +24 +63 — 59.6% +0.84 8–6 (57%) 6–3 (67%) 100.0 -2.07 1979 1743 144.3 — — — — -89 -149 +141 51.5% +0.13 7–10 (41%) 7–8 (47%) 96.9 -0.24
26 1986 1899 151.6 — — — — +57 +84 — 65.3% +0.96 19–3 (86%) 15–13 (54%) 104.4 +0.32 1980 1715 129.3 — — — — -68 -118 +111 46.5% -0.40 7–7 (50%) 7–4 (64%) 101.8 -1.75
27 1987 1914 153.2 — — — — +9 +79 -210 65.7% +0.91 13–5 (72%) 19–11 (63%) 105.9 -0.88 1981 1902 144.4 — — — — -56 -267 +89 62.4% +0.73 23–9 (72%) 20–5 (80%) 117.8 +2.48
28 1988 1808 143.7 — — — — -7 +174 — 59.9% +0.53 14–6 (70%) 13–4 (76%) 107.9 +0.08 1982 1709 130.9 — — — — +33 -109 +214 51.2% -0.06 5–5 (50%) 10–8 (56%) 98.0 +0.35
29 1989 1869 146.8 — — — — -39 +112 — 60.4% +0.46 9–7 (56%) 13–12 (52%) 97.9 -1.82 1983 1688 128.5 — — — — +28 -69 +179 48.2% -0.14 7–3 (70%) 6–7 (46%) 102.9 +0.63
30 1990 1719 152.3 — — — — -59 +350 — 56.2% +0.37 14–14 (50%) 22–13 (63%) 98.8 +1.72 1984 1573 121.2 — — — — -16 +69 +224 39.1% -0.94 2–5 (29%) 5–5 (50%) 94.5 -0.75
31 1991 1720 132.4 +1.72 -0.14 1.075 51.3% -41 +210 — 52.1% +0.27 8–8 (50%) 6–5 (55%) 97.3 +1.82 1985 1595 118.9 — — — — — +47 +142 42.9% -0.20 5–3 (63%) 3–7 (30%) 98.3 +0.58
32 1992 1676 124.1 +0.46 -0.28 0.968 49.8% -20 +116 — 50.0% +0.13 3–3 (50%) 3–5 (38%) 94.6 -0.39 1986 1540 111.0 — — — — -29 — +155 30.0% -1.37 1–2 (33%) 2–2 (50%) 98.4 0.00
33 1993 1607 107.6 -1.77 +0.32 0.915 48.6% — +122 — 38.1% -0.95 1–4 (20%) 4–1 (80%) 98.4 +0.27 1987 1550 100.5 — — — — — — — 37.5% -1.00 1–0 0–1 — +0.34
Career — 2094 156.6 +0.93 -0.14 1.018 50.5% -35 +90 -295 61.4% +0.71 154–97 (61%) 181–105 (63%) 109.8 -1.07 — 1927 139.1 — — — — -40 -114 +151 50.9% +0.02 81–74 (52%) 86–63 (58%) 105.9 +1.57

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.